HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Garciasville, Texas

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Garciasville.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength45/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint44,943.1 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth86.7 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence86.9 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty36.5 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal22.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Garciasville
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Garciasville, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 44,943 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 83rd percentile among 1,863 analyzed Texas localities and the 98th percentile nationally. Starr County reports 50,623 head of cattle in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Citrus City, Texas, 19 miles away with 67,796 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 83rd percentile among analyzed Texas localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles44,943mapped acres · 3.576% of radius · 2025

83th percentile among 1,863 analyzed Texas localities · 98th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Garciasville · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
202087
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
202087 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:102eb01bf572594f2bab1bb21d20
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

86.9 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 140,281 acres · 87th regional percentile · 99th national percentile2009: 109,861 acres · 88th regional percentile · 99th national percentile2010: 123,888 acres · 90th regional percentile · 99th national percentile2011: 14,107 acres · 60th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2012: 87,765 acres · 88th regional percentile · 99th national percentile2013: 92,114 acres · 88th regional percentile · 99th national percentile2014: 88,303 acres · 89th regional percentile · 99th national percentile2015: 84,374 acres · 85th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2016: 111,818 acres · 89th regional percentile · 99th national percentile2017: 99,425 acres · 88th regional percentile · 99th national percentile2018: 80,606 acres · 89th regional percentile · 99th national percentile2019: 49,778 acres · 86th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2020: 59,268 acres · 87th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2021: 72,298 acres · 86th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2022: 62,903 acres · 86th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2023: 76,353 acres · 86th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2024: 48,672 acres · 86th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2025: 44,943 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 98th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

86.7production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Starr County · 2022

How calculated

Starr County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48427:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8de334db08f4f2071c59d32ca69f
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
50,623 head

Starr County · 2022

How calculated

Starr County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48427:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
50,623 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f69312afd2db7388d8945fd35565
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Starr County · 2022

How calculated

Starr County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48427:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bc7a1ca3fb335f60ce5fa1540325
Official record
Open source ↗
SheepHISTORICAL
2,227 head

Starr County · 2022

How calculated

Starr County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48427:sheep:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,227 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6013136e57f38b9a533fd1113aa7
Official record
Open source ↗
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Starr County · 2022

How calculated

Starr County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48427:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8de334db08f4f2071c59d32ca69f
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
50,623 head

Starr County · 2022

How calculated

Starr County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48427:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
50,623 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f69312afd2db7388d8945fd35565
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Starr County · 2022

How calculated

Starr County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48427:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bc7a1ca3fb335f60ce5fa1540325
Official record
Open source ↗
SheepHISTORICAL
2,227 head

Starr County · 2022

How calculated

Starr County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
48427:sheep:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,227 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6013136e57f38b9a533fd1113aa7
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation22.5 in
How calculated

RIO GRANDE CITY, TX US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6756e3c6ff1240e35b96b917a994
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature74.4 °F
How calculated

RIO GRANDE CITY, TX US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c1357f9c76d3b500170035f1186f
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance8 miles
How calculated

RIO GRANDE CITY, TX US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Garciasville reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b48f47fc28b6582eb25ff8f6f08f
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Garciasville · 2026

How calculated

Garciasville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0a2aafb9e325f2f1e4454464ccbf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Garciasville · 2026

How calculated

Garciasville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:65dc51023222e3e68c2984eb9ace
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Garciasville · 2026

How calculated

Garciasville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8b8c81b2fc041e8ed92cefd7452e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Garciasville · 2026

How calculated

Garciasville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:faa4bb8b371558e4963cb21f37ee
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
40 0-100

Garciasville · 2026

How calculated

Garciasville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c1bd394d5a7bb9902c2dfcc1f456
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Garciasville · 2026

How calculated

Garciasville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0448a3ba2c6864a21801d7af698b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
28 weeks

Garciasville · 2026

How calculated

Garciasville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8096d4b1698d74426a8eaeeabbcb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Garciasville · 2026

How calculated

Garciasville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:aa6424d66d47f88bc19201af5971
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
81.8 0-100

Garciasville · 2026

How calculated

Garciasville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:900afa7a13bf9ec06983bcd9e2e7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
24.2 0-100

Garciasville · 2026

How calculated

Garciasville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e262d7eb59654c0efbdc4ae69bdb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
58.5 percent

Garciasville · 2026

How calculated

Garciasville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dc01cccfaf21f5718f86ec6171b8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
42.4 percent

Garciasville · 2026

How calculated

Garciasville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0bc14b9a128ea3a27caa4d529b0b
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

36.5sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Citrus City, Texas19 mi67,796 ac992. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Perezville, Texas19.1 mi62,004 ac92.63. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Salida del Sol Estates, Texas15.7 mi61,333 ac92.14. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Penitas, Texas16.7 mi57,765 ac88.15. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Abram, Texas19.3 mi55,372 ac85.36. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in La Joya, Texas14.6 mi54,801 ac84.97. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Elias-Fela Solis, Texas6.6 mi53,425 ac83.88. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Nina, Texas7.8 mi53,414 ac83.79. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Quesada, Texas7.8 mi53,367 ac83.610. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in La Victoria, Texas4.8 mi53,017 ac83.4
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Garciasville?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Starr Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Garciasville

Alfalfa Hay in Garciasville, TexasExact-type evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 49 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.