Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Ipswich, South Dakota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Ipswich.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint1,535.9 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth46.6 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence65 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty57.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal20.2 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Ipswich, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 1,536 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 22nd percentile among 485 analyzed South Dakota localities and the 71st percentile nationally. Edmunds County reports 10,767 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Agar, South Dakota, 66 miles away with 12,934 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 5.2% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 22nd percentile among analyzed South Dakota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 256 acres · 41st regional percentile · 76th national percentile2009: 80 acres · 24th regional percentile · 69th national percentile2010: 884 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 87th national percentile2011: 49 acres · 29th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2012: 81 acres · 40th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2013: 117 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 64th national percentile2014: 27 acres · 10th regional percentile · 48th national percentile2015: 701 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 76th national percentile2016: 86 acres · 13th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2017: 354 acres · 40th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2018: 213 acres · 24th regional percentile · 72nd national percentile2019: 138 acres · 13th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2020: 470 acres · 44th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2021: 524 acres · 44th regional percentile · 75th national percentile2022: 740 acres · 46th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2023: 176 acres · 13th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2024: 361 acres · 19th regional percentile · 69th national percentile2025: 1,536 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 71st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

46.6production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Edmunds County · 2022

How calculated

Edmunds County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46045:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e0755428f1204fa2aa9bb0c3a602
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
43,510 head

Edmunds County · 2022

How calculated

Edmunds County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46045:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
43,510 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3884b6f2d01e079400a847fbad87
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Edmunds County · 2022

How calculated

Edmunds County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46045:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:294b4ad45dd0aa11b1cee84584e0
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
69 head

Edmunds County · 2022

How calculated

Edmunds County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46045:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
69 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fde67e07d30bdbeb332f7b75d60a
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Edmunds County · 2022

How calculated

Edmunds County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46045:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:18245e9912a0047ad51bfeff4ebe
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
227 head

Edmunds County · 2022

How calculated

Edmunds County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46045:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
227 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4710d8a2d6f087e41d00d9de1cf3
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
29,875 acres

Edmunds County · 2022

How calculated

Edmunds County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46045:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
29,875 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:878979a3b3f4ceea2f55a2c49f27
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
130 farms

Edmunds County · 2022

How calculated

Edmunds County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46045:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
130 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7a633229b00d9553208ec1cf675f
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
960 acres

Edmunds County · 2022

How calculated

Edmunds County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46045:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
960 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6d7a7b438b47db700aa8e3068e90
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
6 farms

Edmunds County · 2022

How calculated

Edmunds County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46045:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:144f54ec058d80b3ef135f64ef51
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
3.2 percent

Edmunds County · 2022

How calculated

Edmunds County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46045:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0a386c03c4724527032554c9b4de
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
59,298 tons

Edmunds County · 2022

How calculated

Edmunds County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46045:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
59,298 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f54497dc0d81be9c859eb12ad1f6
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation20.2 in
How calculated

IPSWICH, SD US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:da9ef9eba22f2f9a88f26981fc85
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature43.7 °F
How calculated

IPSWICH, SD US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f4e07612bb65df3e9a4fb98c5106
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance0.5 miles
How calculated

IPSWICH, SD US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Ipswich reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:de93b8a9c3756e5fcaf06e3d901a
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
21.3 percent

Ipswich · 2026

How calculated

Ipswich · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:26803b856e92c01cec1d340f3653
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
5.2 percent

Ipswich · 2026

How calculated

Ipswich · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:816e4c0c45e7fdef2bebc343e519
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Ipswich · 2026

How calculated

Ipswich · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:22c03a85999852a389b9981ece53
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Ipswich · 2026

How calculated

Ipswich · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:344f90edee01f907dd9712a97fea
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
25.3 0-100

Ipswich · 2026

How calculated

Ipswich · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fa3c7e1cc232621c1c88c5c9d7a9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Ipswich · 2026

How calculated

Ipswich · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:15431200ef796cf981266af2fc3d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
0 weeks

Ipswich · 2026

How calculated

Ipswich · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ffe34cf7a4b714f8c94d66bc67dd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
11.4 0-100

Ipswich · 2026

How calculated

Ipswich · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0ea8a481769ccc9f6a0df69cc722
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Ipswich · 2026

How calculated

Ipswich · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:53d8c4633b5290c57ecbd83c71a7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
16.9 0-100

Ipswich · 2026

How calculated

Ipswich · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9e187d779323ff5339aec64004aa
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
2.6 percent

Ipswich · 2026

How calculated

Ipswich · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:015f286bcbaee2180a607c637a88
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0.5 percent

Ipswich · 2026

How calculated

Ipswich · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a4b69094bf76f8132a451f178e00
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

57.8sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Ipswich?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.