Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Depew, Oklahoma

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Depew.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint563.8 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth57.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence80.2 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty52.4 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal42.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Depew, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 564 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 34th percentile among 846 analyzed Oklahoma localities and the 55th percentile nationally. Creek County reports 36,322 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Morrison, Oklahoma, 45 miles away with 12,166 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 48.8% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 34th percentile among analyzed Oklahoma localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

80.2 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 241 acres · 27th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2009: 166 acres · 29th regional percentile · 75th national percentile2010: 290 acres · 30th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2011: 626 acres · 36th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2012: 286 acres · 25th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2013: 148 acres · 17th regional percentile · 67th national percentile2014: 513 acres · 29th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2015: 410 acres · 26th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2016: 89 acres · 14th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2017: 90 acres · 21st regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2018: 116 acres · 27th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2019: 346 acres · 31st regional percentile · 71st national percentile2020: 319 acres · 24th regional percentile · 69th national percentile2021: 454 acres · 44th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2022: 207 acres · 24th regional percentile · 67th national percentile2023: 549 acres · 29th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2024: 93 acres · 18th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2025: 564 acres · 34th regional percentile · 55th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

57.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
21,871 head

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
21,871 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:28348e8c3fa9120f633a53833d2a
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
41,318 head

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
41,318 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:35f46a0a3c91b6aedb988b27380d
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
10 head

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:52b55f1f4d53a47c577cafb108d5
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
2,300 head

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,300 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d99d6e5dbd81c6f14c142134de47
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bfad1ec07d1f74357fc4b416994b
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
1,638 head

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,638 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e1ae444200c6b1ab0f5e8ee6c8c0
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
37,524 acres

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
37,524 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:81a8f84fd697de2e7dadc88f24ac
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
533 farms

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
533 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ef7646956ab96a715da817f974ac
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
478 acres

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
478 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:614aeaccc7dba2976bae97a017af
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
20 farms

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:64940ad68dd46192e6961d01e10b
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
1.3 percent

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3ac05dc6bedb82d4f876d863a48b
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
34,588 tons

Creek County · 2022

How calculated

Creek County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40037:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
34,588 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:beb9c064b9c7dec3fa19cc8173fc
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation42.1 in
How calculated

BRISTOW, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:822a1a5ce64571ff38a3720a98c3
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature59.5 °F
How calculated

BRISTOW, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fa6235695805cde6df5634603923
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7 miles
How calculated

BRISTOW, OK US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Depew reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:53efc2c5059820d48b42ba5f6a0b
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Depew · 2026

How calculated

Depew · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f5b220c6f3c9e205ed6a30f43bd0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
48.8 percent

Depew · 2026

How calculated

Depew · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2b0dddf28f0950c5349cec7a1d58
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Depew · 2026

How calculated

Depew · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:86897a6faa8ef7c9404a4143e514
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Depew · 2026

How calculated

Depew · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4fcb16364968ad438948133fa253
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
49.8 0-100

Depew · 2026

How calculated

Depew · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a436152251dfcaf2a2f814e594bb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Depew · 2026

How calculated

Depew · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:11015b91882891aa46a2044f05d0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
22 weeks

Depew · 2026

How calculated

Depew · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5a4f88f341ded77c0c107305d2c0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
21.5 0-100

Depew · 2026

How calculated

Depew · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a1113ca12b9876810c33b661f9c0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Depew · 2026

How calculated

Depew · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c8cdae8c2bb23c32f82fc6048b6c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
14.9 0-100

Depew · 2026

How calculated

Depew · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f3f6fbab4dee0b5859511632652f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
53.5 percent

Depew · 2026

How calculated

Depew · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3c86602a32b9636d6e3655d1044b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
9.4 percent

Depew · 2026

How calculated

Depew · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:06a703778de64d05f50fd2eb93e9
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

52.4sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Depew?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.