Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Mitchell, Nebraska

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Mitchell.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint6,743.9 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth72 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence76.3 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty48.1 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal15.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Mitchell, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 6,744 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 62nd percentile among 593 analyzed Nebraska localities and the 90th percentile nationally. Scotts Bluff County reports 6,314 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Lodgepole, Nebraska, 82 miles away with 31,758 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureHIGH
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 62nd percentile among analyzed Nebraska localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

76.3 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 751 acres · 35th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2009: 1,297 acres · 46th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2010: 1,105 acres · 59th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2011: 659 acres · 48th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2012: 836 acres · 64th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2013: 2,291 acres · 63rd regional percentile · 88th national percentile2014: 1,335 acres · 58th regional percentile · 86th national percentile2015: 2,133 acres · 47th regional percentile · 86th national percentile2016: 2,396 acres · 55th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2017: 2,208 acres · 61st regional percentile · 91st national percentile2018: 4,226 acres · 68th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2019: 3,544 acres · 68th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2020: 1,975 acres · 55th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2021: 2,091 acres · 48th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2022: 1,473 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 89th national percentile2023: 3,398 acres · 59th regional percentile · 90th national percentile2024: 891 acres · 44th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2025: 6,744 acres · 63rd regional percentile · 90th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

72production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
13,444 head

Scotts Bluff County · 2022

How calculated

Scotts Bluff County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31157:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13,444 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3c2efd35332d432da5482ca53ad1
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
83,479 head

Scotts Bluff County · 2022

How calculated

Scotts Bluff County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31157:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
83,479 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f209cf9a6d84a691f780769b2093
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
16 head

Scotts Bluff County · 2022

How calculated

Scotts Bluff County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31157:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
16 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7cb794e27d0c24a4fe2edcddbc56
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
852 head

Scotts Bluff County · 2022

How calculated

Scotts Bluff County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31157:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
852 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2318b85cd0814b6459664b9024fd
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Scotts Bluff County · 2022

How calculated

Scotts Bluff County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31157:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:aa47bd8c864692fbad022988a9b9
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
840 head

Scotts Bluff County · 2022

How calculated

Scotts Bluff County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31157:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
840 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ad692a1726c0fbfda0d0ac05b148
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
36,576 acres

Scotts Bluff County · 2022

How calculated

Scotts Bluff County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31157:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
36,576 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b149c60f3c776466580d287961b6
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
274 farms

Scotts Bluff County · 2022

How calculated

Scotts Bluff County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31157:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
274 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3edf10fccb5251bb9bb391ca81ad
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
28,689 acres

Scotts Bluff County · 2022

How calculated

Scotts Bluff County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31157:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
28,689 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7086089ab659ca67cf5b1d3da10d
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
251 farms

Scotts Bluff County · 2022

How calculated

Scotts Bluff County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31157:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
251 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8184936cff1785c9ee6141bceda1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
78.4 percent

Scotts Bluff County · 2022

How calculated

Scotts Bluff County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31157:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cc3a879e63504cddc8671eb2bbee
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
101,311 tons

Scotts Bluff County · 2022

How calculated

Scotts Bluff County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31157:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
101,311 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7068742beb74916dadcea57f8e16
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation15.6 in
How calculated

SCOTTSBLUFF 1E, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:df0e17c6556130326029d75853c2
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature49.1 °F
How calculated

SCOTTSBLUFF 1E, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9d54eb5d96117de3aee98d1c8b66
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance10.3 miles
How calculated

SCOTTSBLUFF 1E, NE US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Mitchell reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e47fda1004595592366d0f8797ed
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Mitchell · 2026

How calculated

Mitchell · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fdf18230ea100bcd53427de533bb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Mitchell · 2026

How calculated

Mitchell · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2cd39c1fad68395b99843eedc802
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
99.9 percent

Mitchell · 2026

How calculated

Mitchell · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:35adc964f38c5e4507ecab805c3c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D3 category

Mitchell · 2026

How calculated

Mitchell · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3ff9d9211304b9c9a777f65da7a7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
80 0-100

Mitchell · 2026

How calculated

Mitchell · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3d06fa187f52c0fe45aea6658ffd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Mitchell · 2026

How calculated

Mitchell · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:23a26bc27b771f5241dd9e60643f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Mitchell · 2026

How calculated

Mitchell · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e37457588504b834784133c40af0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
89.2 0-100

Mitchell · 2026

How calculated

Mitchell · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ae7e1397480c261a944f6dbe8be4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
66.1 0-100

Mitchell · 2026

How calculated

Mitchell · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b7d45e56353624638717c40a2d80
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
80 0-100

Mitchell · 2026

How calculated

Mitchell · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fbd9a2ab0aff969cebcea961d339
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
89.6 percent

Mitchell · 2026

How calculated

Mitchell · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e9efc00e82d7a463ed3c1854b78a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
63.3 percent

Mitchell · 2026

How calculated

Mitchell · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:579c3175c94a80cc495aa8c3c7ad
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

48.1sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Mitchell?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.