HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Rutledge, Minnesota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Rutledge.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint241.1 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth47.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence46.9 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty58.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal33.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Rutledge
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Rutledge, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 241 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 34th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities and the 42nd percentile nationally. Pine County reports 19,582 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Lastrup, Minnesota, 59 miles away with 2,236 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureHIGH
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 34th percentile among analyzed Minnesota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles241mapped acres · 0.019% of radius · 2025

34th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities · 42th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Rutledge · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
1084
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1084 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2cecf4025238330e62e919e8cb50
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

46.9 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 4 acres · 75th regional percentile · 36th national percentile2009: 0 acres · 12th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2010: 22 acres · 94th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2011: 2 acres · 61st regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2012: 15 acres · 80th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2013: 50 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2014: 2 acres · 29th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2015: 4 acres · 35th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2016: 0 acres · 27th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2017: 2 acres · 20th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2018: 0 acres · 6th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2019: 0 acres · 7th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2020: 1 acres · 10th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2021: 3 acres · 15th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2022: 3 acres · 27th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2023: 0 acres · 7th regional percentile · 9th national percentile2024: 61 acres · 40th regional percentile · 40th national percentile2025: 241 acres · 34th regional percentile · 42nd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

47.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
6,864 head

Pine County · 2022

How calculated

Pine County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27115:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,864 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8aeed5e216c2ac673d1a485e304f
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
19,294 head

Pine County · 2022

How calculated

Pine County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27115:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
19,294 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5621ff44b05a294d7b0c171030a1
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
2,969 head

Pine County · 2022

How calculated

Pine County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27115:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,969 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:68edd99021bcf213537799e656f1
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
700 head

Pine County · 2022

How calculated

Pine County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27115:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
700 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d0dbf5950b5300576fc860ee4ba6
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Pine County · 2022

How calculated

Pine County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27115:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9374e6b3be386fc8b7962c1641fc
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
436 head

Pine County · 2022

How calculated

Pine County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27115:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
436 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:04889384177440a830dc0fc09c73
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
40,366 acres

Pine County · 2022

How calculated

Pine County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27115:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
40,366 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7d7b19858b900c538c8a9ce64a38
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
487 farms

Pine County · 2022

How calculated

Pine County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27115:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
487 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:de0ea27d41c8e5d40c0a15993393
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
99 acres

Pine County · 2022

How calculated

Pine County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27115:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
99 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:db9efff5c1f8363beeea82dda1de
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
7 farms

Pine County · 2022

How calculated

Pine County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27115:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3b493e7d388213a625a97a512ceb
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.2 percent

Pine County · 2022

How calculated

Pine County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27115:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6e1087f7cf6481878da30ef28679
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
69,074 tons

Pine County · 2022

How calculated

Pine County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27115:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
69,074 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:92887784efee36df7f56e6053678
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation33.3 in
How calculated

SANDSTONE 6 W, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:873bc1dfe4492ad72e7382388763
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature41.4 °F
How calculated

SANDSTONE 6 W, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:83a3f56eea31fb0b7f2b043453d4
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance11.3 miles
How calculated

SANDSTONE 6 W, MN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Rutledge reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ae14be921819fbf7f6d836d79513
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:be7667c410dfbb4207e514fe0199
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9341aee017753e2dc05d54a64506
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
76.6 percent

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a6ee7e18a7db3ccbefc14f417aef
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D3 category

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:64f319238e89ed755b90fa71c7da
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
75.3 0-100

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3be8d09fd98702e05bbe3dac29b3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:51af7c9e9f5ad14d342967576b1a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
28 weeks

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3ea93fd7fa7f3767590846ba1860
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2e7b095e85f619cc371084835536
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
51.1 0-100

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9c08e5a5e517b3e7e550bae62fa1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
40.2 0-100

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c38c08409a7ffcb370983b8e997c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
57.5 percent

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:85150da79c7a1039d304efed54f4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
36.4 percent

Rutledge · 2026

How calculated

Rutledge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fcfcc1bc001fcd2ef67705aaea36
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

58.6sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Lastrup, Minnesota58.6 mi2,236 ac97.12. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Hillman, Minnesota51.4 mi1,872 ac85.23. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Harding, Minnesota56.2 mi1,715 ac79.74. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Foreston, Minnesota54.1 mi1,589 ac75.65. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Pease, Minnesota53.3 mi1,498 ac72.66. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Princeton, Minnesota58.6 mi1,484 ac71.87. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Milaca, Minnesota50.6 mi1,412 ac69.88. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Baldwin, Minnesota60.4 mi1,424 ac69.79. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Riverton, Minnesota57.8 mi1,114 ac59.510. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Ironton, Minnesota55.9 mi1,062 ac57.8
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Rutledge?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Pine Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Rutledge

Alfalfa Hay in Rutledge, MinnesotaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Rutledge, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Rutledge, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Rutledge, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Rutledge, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Rutledge, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.