HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Rice Lake, Minnesota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Rice Lake.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint466.8 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth58.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence54.2 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty52 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal26.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Rice Lake
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Rice Lake, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 467 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 50th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities and the 51st percentile nationally. Clearwater County reports 5,794 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as New York Mills, Minnesota, 60 miles away with 3,884 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 68.7% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 50th percentile among analyzed Minnesota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles467mapped acres · 0.037% of radius · 2025

50th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities · 51th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Rice Lake · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
2099
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2099 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:98d7da9c42f95a3b69db2649c02d
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

54.2 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 0 acres · 28th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2009: 15 acres · 70th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2010: 0 acres · 40th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 34th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2012: 3 acres · 66th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2013: 10 acres · 49th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 18th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2015: 1 acres · 24th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2016: 21 acres · 79th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2017: 22 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 49th national percentile2018: 5 acres · 25th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2019: 45 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2020: 4 acres · 15th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2021: 13 acres · 44th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2022: 5 acres · 35th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2023: 7 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 28th national percentile2024: 244 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2025: 467 acres · 50th regional percentile · 51st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

58.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
9,563 head

Clearwater County · 2022

How calculated

Clearwater County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27029:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,563 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:db34448b8815ab7a64c7c3fd2d47
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
16,505 head

Clearwater County · 2022

How calculated

Clearwater County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27029:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
16,505 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:894b416fef25b67e044cddace04f
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
39 head

Clearwater County · 2022

How calculated

Clearwater County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27029:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
39 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2e0a0de5e4beb8557217e5e4bbed
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
579 head

Clearwater County · 2022

How calculated

Clearwater County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27029:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
579 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8cf08587690a6712e7c293ff4bf5
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Clearwater County · 2022

How calculated

Clearwater County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27029:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8f96d8c1bfa95ef9218655ade40c
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
549 head

Clearwater County · 2022

How calculated

Clearwater County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27029:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
549 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:94c035d9b651a474f9be27c328fd
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
28,106 acres

Clearwater County · 2022

How calculated

Clearwater County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27029:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
28,106 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:98ce3c147f636b3b3d46da675911
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
238 farms

Clearwater County · 2022

How calculated

Clearwater County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27029:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
238 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bf998d5c6dc351a52e37f0967686
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
204 acres

Clearwater County · 2022

How calculated

Clearwater County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27029:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
204 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:10bcbdcd773d7737f29a697b5612
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
4 farms

Clearwater County · 2022

How calculated

Clearwater County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27029:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:21fdf7ce97ef4d3d768acb0e9f49
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.7 percent

Clearwater County · 2022

How calculated

Clearwater County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27029:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b86c9e457ad7fb1a397468362f21
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
57,666 tons

Clearwater County · 2022

How calculated

Clearwater County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27029:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
57,666 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f7b69c8fbca31e2a61d49c724a3c
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation26.6 in
How calculated

FOSSTON 1 E, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:25de925c9640a35c6bdcb0734073
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature38.8 °F
How calculated

FOSSTON 1 E, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7e2c1be5108c845d0920b7f4222f
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance15.3 miles
How calculated

FOSSTON 1 E, MN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Rice Lake reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:591b344798bd9d1ba2f67b4f2e58
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Rice Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rice Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8d9e147b1868d279d96c62f9e7a7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
68.7 percent

Rice Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rice Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0760dd6b7e739595126ccc1cd72a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Rice Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rice Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:03dcdf35c99bf76f875f27101f08
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Rice Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rice Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0d51df35e314e88c651e0e02a1ec
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
53.7 0-100

Rice Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rice Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c392bd8d9e80e6f91765be51a04c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Rice Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rice Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a5d6bb0d53214b8c5330abb50151
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
13 weeks

Rice Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rice Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4a41e6af801f7525787a94cd2326
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
41.1 0-100

Rice Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rice Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6ba8f61dad6b17c2a67ed9f59132
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
26.7 0-100

Rice Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rice Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4c4fda0b4eadd0e80d47cb26ffa0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
52.6 0-100

Rice Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rice Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5bc166ba396041a10338ea9cfe5c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
39.2 percent

Rice Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rice Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e8a86130df93a066a0ebf1d3c91c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
6.6 percent

Rice Lake · 2026

How calculated

Rice Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8ce11b177ff0f8cf5fa4643725d1
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

52sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in New York Mills, Minnesota60.4 mi3,884 ac972. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Sebeka, Minnesota56.3 mi3,628 ac92.23. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Wolf Lake, Minnesota40.8 mi3,472 ac904. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Richville, Minnesota61.2 mi3,515 ac89.85. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Menahga, Minnesota48.1 mi3,390 ac88.16. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Perham, Minnesota54.5 mi3,280 ac85.67. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Osage, Minnesota34.1 mi2,952 ac80.38. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Dent, Minnesota58.4 mi3,012 ac80.29. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Hubbard, Minnesota45.1 mi2,719 ac75.310. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Frazee, Minnesota46.3 mi2,536 ac71.7
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Rice Lake?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Clearwater Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Rice Lake

Alfalfa Hay in Rice Lake, Clearwater County, MinnesotaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Rice Lake, Clearwater County, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Rice Lake, Clearwater County, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Rice Lake, Clearwater County, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Rice Lake, Clearwater County, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Rice Lake, Clearwater County, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.