HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Effie, Minnesota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Effie.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint0 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth26.4 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence25.3 / 100LOW
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty70.7 / 100HIGH

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal31.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Effie
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Effie, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 0 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 7th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities and the 17th percentile nationally. Itasca County reports 15,564 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Gonvick, Minnesota, 87 miles away with 1,316 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 7th percentile among analyzed Minnesota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles0mapped acres · 0% of radius · 2025

7th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities · 17th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Effie · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
0
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
0 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6cb2b314ea7ebd243e57d037787b
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

25.3 / 100 persistence · LOW

2008: 0 acres · 28th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2009: 1 acres · 30th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 40th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 34th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 46th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2013: 0 acres · 14th regional percentile · 16th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 15th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2015: 0 acres · 13th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2016: 0 acres · 34th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2017: 0 acres · 14th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2018: 0 acres · 6th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2019: 0 acres · 7th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2020: 0 acres · 5th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2021: 0 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 11th national percentile2022: 0 acres · 10th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2023: 0 acres · 8th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2024: 0 acres · 7th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2025: 0 acres · 7th regional percentile · 17th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

26.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
2,731 head

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,731 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3fcaab543311c46b60af61492b10
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
5,421 head

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,421 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d09fb785e64c7ac558e12107e65c
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
5 head

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7c1fe50db203bb5f2de60b95ac3e
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
426 head

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
426 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2020c89a3be183a79eedb4146edd
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
3.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:518f0c6bfd6672b9b16e039d9cbb
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
109 head

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
109 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:37c575aaecbd6c6435f91d00532c
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
24,547 acres

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
24,547 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ad65dd71ab46599aa95be02d720c
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
242 farms

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
242 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cae7d2d4beee9063d4634ad54cf1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
180 acres

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
180 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3d29b298a30a69eb709ed1b29dc2
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farms

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d2ef99aa3d52e5d8c895a92c84bd
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.7 percent

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ac06f17f491cd30e069c286d2259
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
36,202 tons

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
36,202 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0687983cbebd9337a094cb4dbd5f
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation31.1 in
How calculated

MARCELL 5NE, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:abdb5d7d154b659c57e817d5ae06
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature38.4 °F
How calculated

MARCELL 5NE, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:264e1a8027eddba4957281a288bf
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance14.6 miles
How calculated

MARCELL 5NE, MN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Effie reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3459650fb29c22cda83caede1360
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Effie · 2026

How calculated

Effie · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c9d1360b622b214e165aae7ff3c2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Effie · 2026

How calculated

Effie · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:69171b9749d0d36e25e44fcbb58d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Effie · 2026

How calculated

Effie · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d71762bd560b09d8065177084a8c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Effie · 2026

How calculated

Effie · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e054ab5f8c7cf11e5eee1a8dd67a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
60 0-100

Effie · 2026

How calculated

Effie · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:27f198415d1f21559613cb4d5527
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Effie · 2026

How calculated

Effie · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6ef9181fc1b5c1f52d13dfc04153
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
29 weeks

Effie · 2026

How calculated

Effie · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:72b49d456057e7707dde604cefc3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
50.7 0-100

Effie · 2026

How calculated

Effie · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4ae1b43fbf7cd6620c200f1e7757
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Effie · 2026

How calculated

Effie · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:94b2985c877908972a0146eac3e8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Effie · 2026

How calculated

Effie · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f3ad44f4f2a3d5e5a6ed87ed2320
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
82 percent

Effie · 2026

How calculated

Effie · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:77f4aa8ebced3befe3b393d50c59
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
21.7 percent

Effie · 2026

How calculated

Effie · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b096d0bd5d21dae727b95e4cd9af
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

70.7sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Gonvick, Minnesota87.3 mi1,316 ac95.62. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Nevis, Minnesota82.7 mi1,305 ac95.23. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Backus, Minnesota81.6 mi794 ac66.24. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Akeley, Minnesota77.3 mi772 ac65.15. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Pequot Lakes, Minnesota91.8 mi773 ac64.56. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Lake George, Minnesota77.3 mi738 ac63.27. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Jenkins, Minnesota88.4 mi699 ac60.48. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Hackensack, Minnesota75.4 mi683 ac60.19. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Pine River, Minnesota85.1 mi689 ac6010. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Chickamaw Beach, Minnesota83.3 mi659 ac58.4
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Effie?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Itasca Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Effie

Alfalfa Hay in Effie, MinnesotaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Effie, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Effie, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Effie, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Effie, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Effie, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.