HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Delhi, Minnesota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Delhi.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint165.7 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth41.7 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence43.3 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty60.2 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal30.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Delhi
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Delhi, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 166 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 25th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities and the 38th percentile nationally. Redwood County reports 1,063 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Florence, Minnesota, 48 miles away with 1,351 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 61% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 25th percentile among analyzed Minnesota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles166mapped acres · 0.013% of radius · 2025

25th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities · 38th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Delhi · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
745
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
745 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fafd25a33ceee1c9021320e9c6b4
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

43.3 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 0 acres · 28th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2009: 5 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 38th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 40th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 34th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 46th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2013: 0 acres · 14th regional percentile · 16th national percentile2014: 17 acres · 59th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2015: 0 acres · 15th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2016: 0 acres · 27th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2017: 3 acres · 28th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2018: 125 acres · 95th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2019: 1 acres · 13th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2020: 4 acres · 16th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2021: 9 acres · 34th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2022: 4 acres · 31st regional percentile · 21st national percentile2023: 14 acres · 36th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2024: 17 acres · 17th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2025: 166 acres · 25th regional percentile · 38th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

41.7production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
7,583 head

Redwood County · 2022

How calculated

Redwood County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27127:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,583 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:34c72cca578089ea8798b0f42cf2
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
49,053 head

Redwood County · 2022

How calculated

Redwood County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27127:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
49,053 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5d2ba839898f8ac6354f7026e4f5
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
1,062 head

Redwood County · 2022

How calculated

Redwood County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27127:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,062 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ba921e2a4ffeac3eab649f451248
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
207 head

Redwood County · 2022

How calculated

Redwood County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27127:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
207 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dae2754b90f68a2c80cec8de7afb
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Redwood County · 2022

How calculated

Redwood County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27127:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3e05146c65dc337e8b9802459bf0
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Redwood County · 2022

How calculated

Redwood County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27127:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:acbf85e4da4dbd066c615d01aaae
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
3,255 acres

Redwood County · 2022

How calculated

Redwood County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27127:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,255 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2a08bec9156fff41f1053f1713ca
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
148 farms

Redwood County · 2022

How calculated

Redwood County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27127:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
148 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b408c856168a5a693ce31b873a3f
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Redwood County · 2022

How calculated

Redwood County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27127:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f994ad95bf53028f9bd39c361187
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
1 farms

Redwood County · 2022

How calculated

Redwood County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27127:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1c110a4096a88726aeb77e251f92
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
9,845 tons

Redwood County · 2022

How calculated

Redwood County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27127:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,845 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ed2375d5d174b3bd7ae03a302ef5
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3 tons/acre

Redwood County · 2022

How calculated

Redwood County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27127:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cf9b5734000154c1c9b5f0b938cc
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation30.9 in
How calculated

REDWOOD FALLS, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8a53c6b8e1a42e4d07786df229a8
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature44.8 °F
How calculated

REDWOOD FALLS, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:28399e4f745c7662c34e3399a20d
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance6.6 miles
How calculated

REDWOOD FALLS, MN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Delhi reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:afd537938f9fed17bbb1c09c82cd
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
61 percent

Delhi · 2026

How calculated

Delhi · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:07d1d25b3d50d6d45585ad71992b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Delhi · 2026

How calculated

Delhi · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ebfd1bb123851dd14b82b706bfdd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Delhi · 2026

How calculated

Delhi · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2983f957dca67dab25d93ecfd92b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Delhi · 2026

How calculated

Delhi · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f5f39a8396227a40c6f0b6219e64
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
32.2 0-100

Delhi · 2026

How calculated

Delhi · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:724a5fd728a159f73814090b4271
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Delhi · 2026

How calculated

Delhi · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fe41090a8491a2292580db1d5a6e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
2 weeks

Delhi · 2026

How calculated

Delhi · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:64728affc70d6c18a4df069192ff
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Delhi · 2026

How calculated

Delhi · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:80e54eb424331aa44d7e308734d8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
26.2 0-100

Delhi · 2026

How calculated

Delhi · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c29130324aa22111e0f374ce4971
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
21.2 0-100

Delhi · 2026

How calculated

Delhi · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3550fbc0887efc061296f6f9f55e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
12.2 percent

Delhi · 2026

How calculated

Delhi · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f9450dbcb441f3ed359dd7d53907
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Delhi · 2026

How calculated

Delhi · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:44a217bb5e46d8f86056ec2d51f7
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

60.2sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Florence, Minnesota48.3 mi1,351 ac97.62. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Slayton, Minnesota49.9 mi1,329 ac96.33. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in New London, Minnesota50 mi919 ac73.54. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Spicer, Minnesota45.9 mi812 ac67.85. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Grove City, Minnesota46.1 mi693 ac61.26. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Litchfield, Minnesota49.4 mi591 ac55.37. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Currie, Minnesota42.8 mi578 ac558. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Kandiyohi, Minnesota39.3 mi572 ac54.89. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Avoca, Minnesota49.7 mi576 ac54.510. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Atwater, Minnesota42.8 mi564 ac54.1
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Delhi?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Redwood Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Delhi

Alfalfa Hay in Delhi, MinnesotaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Delhi, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Delhi, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Delhi, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Delhi, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Delhi, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.