HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Wolf Lake, Michigan

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Wolf Lake.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint379.9 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth62 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence65 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty51.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal35.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Wolf Lake
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Wolf Lake, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 380 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 50th percentile among 745 analyzed Michigan localities and the 48th percentile nationally. Muskegon County reports 1,857 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Mecosta, Michigan, 51 miles away with 1,793 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 50th percentile among analyzed Michigan localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles380mapped acres · 0.03% of radius · 2025

50th percentile among 745 analyzed Michigan localities · 48th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Wolf Lake · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
1708
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1708 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f441d8971e161e13255a23c3d734
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 0 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2009: 46 acres · 76th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2010: 30 acres · 60th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2011: 25 acres · 51st regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2012: 364 acres · 97th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2013: 17 acres · 26th regional percentile · 41st national percentile2014: 131 acres · 81st regional percentile · 65th national percentile2015: 241 acres · 91st regional percentile · 65th national percentile2016: 287 acres · 70th regional percentile · 71st national percentile2017: 274 acres · 77th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2018: 661 acres · 89th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2019: 741 acres · 84th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2020: 1,005 acres · 84th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2021: 1,888 acres · 85th regional percentile · 87th national percentile2022: 881 acres · 90th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2023: 180 acres · 71st regional percentile · 64th national percentile2024: 526 acres · 84th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2025: 380 acres · 50th regional percentile · 48th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

62production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
1,046 head

Muskegon County · 2022

How calculated

Muskegon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26121:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,046 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d126069fda835b3e9a927280b86d
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
9,372 head

Muskegon County · 2022

How calculated

Muskegon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26121:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,372 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b311a594f7ccc0c8af369a74c6fc
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
5,223 head

Muskegon County · 2022

How calculated

Muskegon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26121:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,223 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7e7c9023fafb79c36c692e65108b
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
596 head

Muskegon County · 2022

How calculated

Muskegon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26121:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
596 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:87fe49380f743c9ef3aaa21555d7
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Muskegon County · 2022

How calculated

Muskegon County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26121:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e435f954731a8efcda210526b790
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
36 head

Muskegon County · 2022

How calculated

Muskegon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26121:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
36 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ad1c67e5538eb5d91af5c17c4214
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
6,727 acres

Muskegon County · 2022

How calculated

Muskegon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26121:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,727 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e3899e2aa0cf00057453a7aca3be
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
134 farms

Muskegon County · 2022

How calculated

Muskegon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26121:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
134 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b5efff1eab6a9674cdfcc005032e
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
202 acres

Muskegon County · 2022

How calculated

Muskegon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26121:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
202 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:127133e3e433400221f408eb4278
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
4 farms

Muskegon County · 2022

How calculated

Muskegon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26121:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3bee55e439caad45a64324d5b74d
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
3 percent

Muskegon County · 2022

How calculated

Muskegon County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26121:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3e606d2747e0ecf6e238dd6b5ab3
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
12,893 tons

Muskegon County · 2022

How calculated

Muskegon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26121:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
12,893 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a64f10a9124ebd71a5445e5c22b2
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation35.1 in
How calculated

MUSKEGON CO AP, MI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b2ff6dc5e91ce6dc7ec560e7a456
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature49.4 °F
How calculated

MUSKEGON CO AP, MI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c839cea6d36252b5bb7538b182f3
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance8.1 miles
How calculated

MUSKEGON CO AP, MI US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Wolf Lake reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7e1e0e015c0135bb20e4cc334e3d
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Wolf Lake · 2026

How calculated

Wolf Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cc796a7f0cc63457d74f31cd2eed
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Wolf Lake · 2026

How calculated

Wolf Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dca9baddf1ec0c352a163d86f695
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Wolf Lake · 2026

How calculated

Wolf Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:88eb4dea07e90af723bb7fa9f0e0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Wolf Lake · 2026

How calculated

Wolf Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b1589e65ec5f93f417d5092d63e0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
20 0-100

Wolf Lake · 2026

How calculated

Wolf Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e342d57a92f3bd1a2a86147ebe48
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Wolf Lake · 2026

How calculated

Wolf Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5cdedbe9f935d5e9a5dd86d42e65
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
17 weeks

Wolf Lake · 2026

How calculated

Wolf Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9abab78bb68b66e14a832884f278
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Wolf Lake · 2026

How calculated

Wolf Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:69bddffbac1528722e7f507d0900
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Wolf Lake · 2026

How calculated

Wolf Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9cefab6b3546c1a8fb2de930638c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
16.3 0-100

Wolf Lake · 2026

How calculated

Wolf Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bc0b7c1e8bb0247cef7f7d855ca5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
32.1 percent

Wolf Lake · 2026

How calculated

Wolf Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:788a3f1860cc8e1308fb33503f31
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
4.8 percent

Wolf Lake · 2026

How calculated

Wolf Lake · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1b7e7f92ef0b57b3ff2f6ed994ca
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

51.6sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Mecosta, Michigan51.3 mi1,793 ac97.42. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Canadian Lakes, Michigan46.8 mi1,775 ac96.93. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Edmore, Michigan55.2 mi1,650 ac91.24. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Stanton, Michigan52.1 mi1,518 ac85.95. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in McBride, Michigan54.2 mi1,521 ac85.96. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Lakeview, Michigan44.6 mi1,487 ac857. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Crystal, Michigan59.4 mi1,503 ac84.98. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Hersey, Michigan53.7 mi1,457 ac83.39. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Paris, Michigan47.9 mi1,415 ac81.810. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Sheridan, Michigan52 mi1,407 ac81.2
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Wolf Lake?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Muskegon Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Wolf Lake

Alfalfa Hay in Wolf Lake, MichiganExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Wolf Lake, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Wolf Lake, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Wolf Lake, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Wolf Lake, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Wolf Lake, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.