HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Franklin, Michigan

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Franklin.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint47.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth43.3 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence61.4 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty57.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal33 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Franklin
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Franklin, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 48 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 18th percentile among 745 analyzed Michigan localities and the 28th percentile nationally. Oakland County reports 1,446 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Dryden, Michigan, 31 miles away with 517 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 40.7% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 18th percentile among analyzed Michigan localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles48mapped acres · 0.004% of radius · 2025

18th percentile among 745 analyzed Michigan localities · 28th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Franklin · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
214
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
214 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:95a8f2ce9afb0c9e0c5c88816821
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

61.4 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 0 acres · 18th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2009: 0 acres · 18th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2010: 3 acres · 12th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2011: 1 acres · 20th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2012: 3 acres · 17th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2013: 20 acres · 29th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2014: 3 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 29th national percentile2015: 8 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 34th national percentile2016: 13 acres · 19th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2017: 4 acres · 20th regional percentile · 35th national percentile2018: 9 acres · 16th regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2019: 27 acres · 16th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2020: 64 acres · 15th regional percentile · 44th national percentile2021: 46 acres · 8th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2022: 11 acres · 12th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2023: 7 acres · 17th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2024: 24 acres · 17th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2025: 48 acres · 18th regional percentile · 28th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

43.3production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
379 head

Oakland County · 2022

How calculated

Oakland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26125:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
379 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b22a61ec4b63641dc71c61b70744
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
1,028 head

Oakland County · 2022

How calculated

Oakland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26125:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,028 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:52147464ce4ca8678000ccc1fc43
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
140 head

Oakland County · 2022

How calculated

Oakland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26125:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
140 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:eaf986501d41c9b62d965903829a
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,391 head

Oakland County · 2022

How calculated

Oakland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26125:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,391 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a44daab020216f101b5a09549cca
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Oakland County · 2022

How calculated

Oakland County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26125:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1008098ff01f487eb0a6fc26e812
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Oakland County · 2022

How calculated

Oakland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26125:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4cd85b96c1b49877d7fd7a571ed0
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
4,671 acres

Oakland County · 2022

How calculated

Oakland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26125:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,671 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7156cfec1bbffbfcf793fd693550
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
111 farms

Oakland County · 2022

How calculated

Oakland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26125:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
111 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:10bdee31ad2787c8c8491f1ae028
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
34 acres

Oakland County · 2022

How calculated

Oakland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26125:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
34 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:36647074228550f40b01cb58389f
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
8 farms

Oakland County · 2022

How calculated

Oakland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26125:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5bfd9795d953f6c9a8a26f4e1530
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.7 percent

Oakland County · 2022

How calculated

Oakland County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26125:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1ee66f0b495d127cc9401e6ed912
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
6,850 tons

Oakland County · 2022

How calculated

Oakland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26125:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,850 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:563acbd5f4cfe69f8c572b8bf141
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation33 in
How calculated

FARMINGTON, MI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ba5b6875f90fdec83277a3b621d0
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature47.6 °F
How calculated

FARMINGTON, MI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:51ae18367806649edbfa876ff58d
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance4.7 miles
How calculated

FARMINGTON, MI US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Franklin reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2dbf92b440c58ef899f085dc9288
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
40.7 percent

Franklin · 2026

How calculated

Franklin · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:13abf383b4870f70031ccf7d582e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Franklin · 2026

How calculated

Franklin · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:822b0ef024f332ec1249a4126d65
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Franklin · 2026

How calculated

Franklin · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dd35dd361f454e18c8951f85d05d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Franklin · 2026

How calculated

Franklin · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:94dfc5bc86be09000c494161320d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
28.1 0-100

Franklin · 2026

How calculated

Franklin · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0ebc294aa88c0dd141722b21e3b9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Franklin · 2026

How calculated

Franklin · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:adfd7dd1fdfe2d8f1e02bbc36f3d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
17 weeks

Franklin · 2026

How calculated

Franklin · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:35d7aba5c1d31af92009944fca0e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Franklin · 2026

How calculated

Franklin · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3941acdf84f9581ccccabaab619b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
7 0-100

Franklin · 2026

How calculated

Franklin · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:47ffc33655215a1e74f25eb5b541
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0.2 0-100

Franklin · 2026

How calculated

Franklin · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c92943c87006dd5bc464f0c84573
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
29.2 percent

Franklin · 2026

How calculated

Franklin · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:845f1aeb416148d31a3b195e3683
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Franklin · 2026

How calculated

Franklin · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:626d998901020e98247506d8f835
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

57.6sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Dryden, Michigan30.9 mi517 ac98.52. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Metamora, Michigan29.5 mi490 ac94.63. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Almont, Michigan30.7 mi469 ac91.54. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Armada, Michigan31 mi398 ac81.25. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Leonard, Michigan25.3 mi351 ac74.76. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Romeo, Michigan25 mi313 ac69.27. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Goodrich, Michigan29.2 mi257 ac60.88. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Oxford, Michigan21.1 mi228 ac579. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Ortonville, Michigan23.8 mi226 ac56.510. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in New Haven, Michigan29.6 mi227 ac56.4
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Franklin?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Oakland Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Franklin

Alfalfa Hay in Franklin, MichiganExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Franklin, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Franklin, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Franklin, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Franklin, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Franklin, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.