HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Superior, Iowa

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Superior.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint340 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth48.9 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence50.6 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty56.2 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal29.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Superior
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Superior, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 340 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 34th percentile among 1,026 analyzed Iowa localities and the 47th percentile nationally. Dickinson County reports 441 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Ashton, Iowa, 43 miles away with 1,246 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 36.7% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 34th percentile among analyzed Iowa localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles340mapped acres · 0.027% of radius · 2025

34th percentile among 1,026 analyzed Iowa localities · 47th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Superior · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
1529
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1529 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8a24457ccf5574c1b921e74f9efc
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

50.6 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 0 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 17th national percentile2009: 0 acres · 54th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 27th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 44th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 39th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2013: 2 acres · 14th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 9th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2015: 0 acres · 11th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2016: 4 acres · 61st regional percentile · 28th national percentile2017: 0 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 21st national percentile2018: 4 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 26th national percentile2019: 3 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 20th national percentile2020: 1 acres · 6th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2021: 13 acres · 31st regional percentile · 31st national percentile2022: 2 acres · 27th regional percentile · 16th national percentile2023: 16 acres · 45th regional percentile · 35th national percentile2024: 146 acres · 59th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2025: 340 acres · 34th regional percentile · 47th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

48.9production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
2,927 head

Dickinson County · 2022

How calculated

Dickinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19059:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,927 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b13ffc380c51feaf4fa801b0aa59
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
23,291 head

Dickinson County · 2022

How calculated

Dickinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19059:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
23,291 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:64ec56ef4186a4780f1d7cd806a4
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
4,500 head

Dickinson County · 2022

How calculated

Dickinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19059:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,500 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:620109b915a6c2598bcd6cb18d1d
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
77 head

Dickinson County · 2022

How calculated

Dickinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19059:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
77 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a9e6c2e6c824920ae00b33c24dba
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Dickinson County · 2022

How calculated

Dickinson County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19059:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:11df895ccf84d1842e0c4fd7541e
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
211 head

Dickinson County · 2022

How calculated

Dickinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19059:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
211 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:aa97952109e70614b645bdd9c311
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
1,860 acres

Dickinson County · 2022

How calculated

Dickinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19059:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,860 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dbe80c3d1f387140d90d56a9bf67
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
69 farms

Dickinson County · 2022

How calculated

Dickinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19059:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
69 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5a40d986a715baeea0e3dcd5972a
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
5 acres

Dickinson County · 2022

How calculated

Dickinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19059:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8f9c7d78588ed01335b4ed799316
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
5 farms

Dickinson County · 2022

How calculated

Dickinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19059:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:54c3b31deb65ab51c65dc7332d26
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.3 percent

Dickinson County · 2022

How calculated

Dickinson County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19059:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:07eaab2f072387ca05157edb8a8c
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
5,597 tons

Dickinson County · 2022

How calculated

Dickinson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19059:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,597 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:33191a0698f176633121b51a21c5
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation29.1 in
How calculated

SPIRIT LAKE, IA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:52cee9a0f68e2f607bcefd1f5f0e
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature45.7 °F
How calculated

SPIRIT LAKE, IA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d8583aef7b15457c34a7534019db
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance9.7 miles
How calculated

SPIRIT LAKE, IA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Superior reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9305d0d948ce5bf5a2859f1e343a
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
36.7 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2f73c85c9fbb766452655ba92343
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:345b830de9be6a7c8243f64f8bed
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c0b4bae6dd8f31db19bf0835d3d7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cae85bd37ab61a69158fbcf55479
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
27.3 0-100

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1b37e3434463252a33da0cd07089
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5590260e21d0e9720dff15055ff9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
7 weeks

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2fa80bed7d0d751f80701245d468
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e5abfd0065c1bc6f74882edcb7b8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a48e9366d21ad36ac1d7c8af9967
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
21.4 0-100

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e423763dcaf103f11ee4c9fa2938
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
16.5 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:935b3755b3f6defeee9d93e3a5e7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Superior · 2026

How calculated

Superior · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eebf87e463b5bce620100c886b1a
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

56.2sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Ashton, Iowa43.3 mi1,246 ac97.82. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Archer, Iowa45.8 mi776 ac69.43. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Sibley, Iowa40 mi601 ac59.24. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Hartley, Iowa31.9 mi570 ac57.75. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Sanborn, Iowa39.7 mi560 ac56.76. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Melvin, Iowa34.8 mi534 ac55.47. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Rushmore, Minnesota44.6 mi534 ac54.98. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Primghar, Iowa41.5 mi503 ac53.29. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Peterson, Iowa40.9 mi476 ac51.610. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Bigelow, Minnesota37.6 mi439 ac49.6
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Superior?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Dickinson Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Superior

Alfalfa Hay in Superior, IowaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Superior, IowaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Superior, IowaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Superior, IowaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Superior, IowaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Superior, IowaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 65 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.