HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Osgood, Indiana

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Osgood.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint216.2 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth37.2 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence65 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty60.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal47 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Osgood
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Osgood, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 216 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 5th percentile among 974 analyzed Indiana localities and the 41st percentile nationally. Ripley County reports 4,592 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Mineral Springs, Indiana, 31 miles away with 1,165 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 5th percentile among analyzed Indiana localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles216mapped acres · 0.017% of radius · 2025

5th percentile among 974 analyzed Indiana localities · 41th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Osgood · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
972
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
972 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3cf6f0e189acb3d7fc221872c307
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 6 acres · 35th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2009: 4 acres · 41st regional percentile · 36th national percentile2010: 1 acres · 12th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2011: 5 acres · 51st regional percentile · 40th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 17th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2013: 0 acres · 5th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 12th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2015: 0 acres · 11th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2016: 4 acres · 19th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2017: 3 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 35th national percentile2018: 86 acres · 56th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2019: 16 acres · 20th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2020: 6 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 21st national percentile2021: 9 acres · 14th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2022: 52 acres · 39th regional percentile · 49th national percentile2023: 19 acres · 44th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2024: 30 acres · 21st regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2025: 216 acres · 5th regional percentile · 41st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

37.2production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Ripley County · 2022

How calculated

Ripley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18137:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:260bda19cf7d53873020d717c035
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
8,289 head

Ripley County · 2022

How calculated

Ripley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18137:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8,289 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:46582af005d72a1465d750e4d8fd
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Ripley County · 2022

How calculated

Ripley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18137:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6e061d83b2bd55b4935dd1af043f
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
364 head

Ripley County · 2022

How calculated

Ripley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18137:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
364 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:865f0d8d131f674de2650d9a564c
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Ripley County · 2022

How calculated

Ripley County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18137:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:48cd9626ef15ffaecf8531781e5a
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
344 head

Ripley County · 2022

How calculated

Ripley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18137:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
344 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9453a7f578554cf8547c572a857a
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
6,351 acres

Ripley County · 2022

How calculated

Ripley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18137:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,351 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cc2bc0192612b26a38ae863d8ae8
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
285 farms

Ripley County · 2022

How calculated

Ripley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18137:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
285 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0cf6f11e88d9da1f534f7577212a
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Ripley County · 2022

How calculated

Ripley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18137:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e765da82d0a5741fccdd896981ae
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Ripley County · 2022

How calculated

Ripley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18137:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b494fc5e980410efebbe80143c4b
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
14,644 tons

Ripley County · 2022

How calculated

Ripley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18137:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14,644 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ae1623e1e7d94f1ce66c2025a9be
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.3 tons/acre

Ripley County · 2022

How calculated

Ripley County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
18137:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c800f53b1cd4ec9858c42aa06859
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation47 in
How calculated

GREENSBURG, IN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:732b6ea7771c99a834db7eb1479a
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature53.6 °F
How calculated

GREENSBURG, IN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:75e6560b55612a24e19b5c3cab5e
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance18.4 miles
How calculated

GREENSBURG, IN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Osgood reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ac8a8cc864e6d21e3b8f87e39c50
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Osgood · 2026

How calculated

Osgood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:13f5aabed84b8867ca675286cc3a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Osgood · 2026

How calculated

Osgood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:79c55e645cd56b602d656c1dfef1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Osgood · 2026

How calculated

Osgood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5dcfd58fcd2e66357af9405156a2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Osgood · 2026

How calculated

Osgood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c5753d7f69f1cf6351094037fdae
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Osgood · 2026

How calculated

Osgood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6c055ef3e38c501a8d21dbafb50c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Osgood · 2026

How calculated

Osgood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a51ad4ed7ced48a31f468b664576
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
4 weeks

Osgood · 2026

How calculated

Osgood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5201e9e5af98120f95b71f2f7518
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Osgood · 2026

How calculated

Osgood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7b95834fd121b7cb6d3946925d22
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
14.8 0-100

Osgood · 2026

How calculated

Osgood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:94de97138db18860cbda0f54cec7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Osgood · 2026

How calculated

Osgood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7e56b52eabb7ab85f91e3cf93100
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
7.5 percent

Osgood · 2026

How calculated

Osgood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e2b7f185ef881e5a250cf8287c09
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Osgood · 2026

How calculated

Osgood · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:6c7e47ebb8202496
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9ba78d25c824927cb525f112de63
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

60.6sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Mineral Springs, Indiana30.5 mi1,165 ac98.52. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Hope, Indiana27.9 mi1,161 ac98.33. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Azalia, Indiana29.7 mi1,103 ac94.54. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Schaefer Lake, Indiana26.7 mi1,086 ac93.65. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Petersville, Indiana29 mi1,088 ac93.66. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Waldron, Indiana29.9 mi1,082 ac93.27. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Geneva, Indiana29.1 mi1,080 ac93.18. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Hartsville, Indiana23.8 mi1,040 ac90.79. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Newbern, Indiana25.4 mi1,040 ac90.710. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Elizabethtown, Indiana27.9 mi1,038 ac90.4
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Osgood?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Ripley Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Osgood

Alfalfa Hay in Osgood, IndianaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Osgood, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Osgood, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Osgood, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Osgood, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Osgood, IndianaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.