HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Mount Pulaski, Illinois

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Mount Pulaski.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint0 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth32.4 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence54.2 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty62.1 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal39.8 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Mount Pulaski
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Mount Pulaski, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 0 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 2nd percentile among 1,461 analyzed Illinois localities and the 17th percentile nationally. Logan County reports 289 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Easton, Illinois, 33 miles away with 3,429 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 2nd percentile among analyzed Illinois localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles0mapped acres · 0% of radius · 2025

2th percentile among 1,461 analyzed Illinois localities · 17th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Mount Pulaski · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
0
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
0 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c3c2e2ff7d26298a73cea78e09ff
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

54.2 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 2 acres · 40th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2009: 0 acres · 28th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2010: 2 acres · 45th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2011: 5 acres · 46th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 19th national percentile2013: 1 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2014: 0 acres · 15th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2015: 4 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 30th national percentile2016: 0 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 15th national percentile2017: 0 acres · 11th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2018: 0 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 15th national percentile2019: 1 acres · 7th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2020: 1 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 11th national percentile2021: 2 acres · 30th regional percentile · 18th national percentile2022: 0 acres · 10th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2023: 0 acres · 12th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2024: 23 acres · 30th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2025: 0 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 17th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

32.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
1,270 head

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17107:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,270 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:44ec2954e60eac1c0fdacb0121a3
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
2,307 head

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17107:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,307 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:28ab6c733688d9efb19b86d9c2f9
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
90 head

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17107:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
90 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:76b4a2c706df75eb70bd916c536b
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
98 head

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17107:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
98 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a83f36022b6b365e9c34942a0ff6
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17107:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:063b24ba96e4f1b1dba961a8cfc0
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17107:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:618061825da7bf5c0c3f2b4a33b3
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
1,502 acres

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17107:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,502 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1c3d743ab909a96897c7144aabd8
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
107 farms

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17107:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
107 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b106fe224f85a904dd2f28339161
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
30 acres

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17107:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
30 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:05bcb8bb0f4c4439eec716fe2408
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farms

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17107:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5fd09f726d3a394f24815292f667
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
2 percent

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17107:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:774ac4f99055f347afa00bec8075
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
4,806 tons

Logan County · 2022

How calculated

Logan County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17107:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,806 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f1649fd5821f6ff3727590296209
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation39.8 in
How calculated

LINCOLN, IL US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:029090282f2d2b0271a98412152c
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature52.2 °F
How calculated

LINCOLN, IL US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:60daf12d7476808b71f339660887
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance10.2 miles
How calculated

LINCOLN, IL US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Mount Pulaski reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7fd9faf0fd393a33c4647af41785
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Mount Pulaski · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pulaski · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cf4f4055bac14296236f179bc039
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Mount Pulaski · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pulaski · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6810eaea0c90877907c03a6dce3c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Mount Pulaski · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pulaski · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:74733c2a4da7a8a8c742b7b175c5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Mount Pulaski · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pulaski · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6ceb9baae956de4c43514d6c10af
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Mount Pulaski · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pulaski · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8f1c8d8f394ababf43ff8c438767
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Mount Pulaski · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pulaski · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d3ccc455c95286504f14168e7546
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
29 weeks

Mount Pulaski · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pulaski · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6ecc34255ba90a2dc36d58c5eb20
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Mount Pulaski · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pulaski · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3cdb2efdeb7c6788a31fb6c448fa
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
74.9 0-100

Mount Pulaski · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pulaski · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c3f8407c87f9b5d7f344ddb5d596
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Mount Pulaski · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pulaski · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9c2371c21215a37fde3a03c4045e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
54.6 percent

Mount Pulaski · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pulaski · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8a3d8b59a29263c6c7eb19755481
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
32.1 percent

Mount Pulaski · 2026

How calculated

Mount Pulaski · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:687463a1e441689bd424e070e053
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

62.1sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Easton, Illinois33.2 mi3,429 ac98.32. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Mason City, Illinois25.6 mi3,329 ac96.53. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Greenview, Illinois24.7 mi3,088 ac91.34. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in San Jose, Illinois26.5 mi2,798 ac84.95. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Green Valley, Illinois33.4 mi2,721 ac82.86. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Oakford, Illinois36.6 mi2,699 ac82.27. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in New Holland, Illinois19.8 mi2,635 ac81.68. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Delavan, Illinois28.5 mi2,351 ac759. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Petersburg, Illinois29.7 mi2,210 ac71.910. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Middletown, Illinois17.3 mi2,027 ac68.5
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Mount Pulaski?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Logan Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Mount Pulaski

Alfalfa Hay in Mount Pulaski, IllinoisExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Mount Pulaski, IllinoisContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Mount Pulaski, IllinoisContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Mount Pulaski, IllinoisContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Mount Pulaski, IllinoisContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Mount Pulaski, IllinoisContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.