Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Graham, Georgia

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Graham.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint2,881.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth79.6 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence65 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty42.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal50.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Graham, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 2,882 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 82nd percentile among 676 analyzed Georgia localities and the 81st percentile nationally. Appling County reports 11,755 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Rebecca, Georgia, 58 miles away with 13,661 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 71.9% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 82nd percentile among analyzed Georgia localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 181 acres · 63rd regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2009: 102 acres · 59th regional percentile · 71st national percentile2010: 66 acres · 55th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2011: 369 acres · 89th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2012: 300 acres · 71st regional percentile · 76th national percentile2013: 137 acres · 51st regional percentile · 66th national percentile2014: 123 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 64th national percentile2015: 566 acres · 69th regional percentile · 74th national percentile2016: 230 acres · 67th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2017: 419 acres · 76th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2018: 129 acres · 60th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2019: 146 acres · 45th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2020: 296 acres · 56th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2021: 568 acres · 76th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2022: 768 acres · 84th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2023: 590 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 77th national percentile2024: 485 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2025: 2,882 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 81st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

79.6production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
4,811 head

Appling County · 2022

How calculated

Appling County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13001:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,811 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4db59684fefec212056b863ce2e2
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
7,167 head

Appling County · 2022

How calculated

Appling County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13001:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,167 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:eb720fcec82b3d8d24d2db323a38
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
26 head

Appling County · 2022

How calculated

Appling County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13001:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
26 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ccde5c3e784c0408263bc34c733b
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
170 head

Appling County · 2022

How calculated

Appling County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13001:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
170 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b6db58dc77b33a05ec56123f1b51
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Appling County · 2022

How calculated

Appling County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13001:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:797688630fe545db24ee9a91eadd
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
491 head

Appling County · 2022

How calculated

Appling County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13001:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
491 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9c176afe1781677c4c0f7571620f
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
11,796 acres

Appling County · 2022

How calculated

Appling County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13001:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11,796 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9130d4aa36545ce31ddf5626e5cf
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
93 farms

Appling County · 2022

How calculated

Appling County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13001:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
93 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:aa67fd4d463655ef0203d755b1a0
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Appling County · 2022

How calculated

Appling County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13001:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9b5cfb77c24ab7a1d3e6495a6077
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farms

Appling County · 2022

How calculated

Appling County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13001:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8c71f56a83a7ade124f172bc3472
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
29,575 tons

Appling County · 2022

How calculated

Appling County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13001:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
29,575 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5791e5b7a19968565d9a28884790
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.5 tons/acre

Appling County · 2022

How calculated

Appling County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
13001:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b8ed3dc56377b49d06b202d75757
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation50.9 in
How calculated

HAZLEHURST, GA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4974a4ec1a6c08a182ec1bc1a575
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature66.1 °F
How calculated

HAZLEHURST, GA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4c287d23c5c92589df1186735307
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance6.5 miles
How calculated

HAZLEHURST, GA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Graham reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8cc0b7c744559f2c82a3a691d5c7
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
71.9 percent

Graham · 2026

How calculated

Graham · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f87d1c51720aa2623af0dac346e4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Graham · 2026

How calculated

Graham · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:35c8c49fd46281dcb4c3417872b9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Graham · 2026

How calculated

Graham · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:224d21e781379773f2d681471add
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Graham · 2026

How calculated

Graham · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2c9e8cf69e6ee129e84e590439fa
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
34 0-100

Graham · 2026

How calculated

Graham · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7b691d4f9e1ff05fa0be17a429b6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Graham · 2026

How calculated

Graham · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1275a68fd4cad1c5d09f3e50927d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
49 weeks

Graham · 2026

How calculated

Graham · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7af630073edc313beafe3e6a2737
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Graham · 2026

How calculated

Graham · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:52c2d623585190f2ed51733c04c9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
80 0-100

Graham · 2026

How calculated

Graham · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:77e25f01c8ab15ec952b7cf8a62b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
33.1 0-100

Graham · 2026

How calculated

Graham · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dd6e85dc1adc7794660e8a6cbab4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
87.7 percent

Graham · 2026

How calculated

Graham · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:04801779ba180425c5961ab2f377
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
55.7 percent

Graham · 2026

How calculated

Graham · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:98d2ffd6c0d0cfde
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e912449e143cf17d3b6c410b3fc2
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

42.6sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Graham?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.