HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay
in Daisy, Arkansas

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay serving Daisy.

Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint0 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Sorghum crop context

Production depth39 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence39.7 / 100LOW
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty61.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal58.4 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes Sell Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Near Daisy
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies sorghum crop context around Daisy, but it does not measure how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 0 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 22nd percentile among 626 analyzed Arkansas localities and the 17th percentile nationally. Pike County reports 15,969 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Foreman, Arkansas, 52 miles away with 1,438 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 0.4% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped sorghum crop context footprint ranks at the 22nd percentile among analyzed Arkansas localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader sorghum crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local sorghum crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles0mapped acres · 0% of radius · 2025

22th percentile among 626 analyzed Arkansas localities · 17th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Daisy · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
0
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
0 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ecda7cf4f376e9e3968a495f730d
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

39.7 / 100 persistence · LOW

2008: 3 acres · 11th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2009: 18 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2010: 0 acres · 7th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 13th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2012: 0 acres · 10th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2013: 10 acres · 19th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 11th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2015: 0 acres · 13th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2016: 0 acres · 9th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2017: 0 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 18th national percentile2018: 0 acres · 11th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2019: 1 acres · 12th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2020: 1 acres · 1st regional percentile · 12th national percentile2021: 0 acres · 11th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2022: 2 acres · 17th regional percentile · 16th national percentile2023: 0 acres · 19th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2024: 17 acres · 35th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2025: 0 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 17th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

39production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
10,521 head

Pike County · 2022

How calculated

Pike County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05109:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10,521 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9f07ef5c7c6f333e994d2648586b
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
19,508 head

Pike County · 2022

How calculated

Pike County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05109:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
19,508 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b8a6acb0bb408efcf49710c05c59
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Pike County · 2022

How calculated

Pike County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05109:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:11fe8ebfe18c122df3bdf2ce4a91
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
193 head

Pike County · 2022

How calculated

Pike County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05109:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
193 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:34c9cf2a0b43c9cf97156dfa7387
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Pike County · 2022

How calculated

Pike County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05109:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f0f6b39646f0e4cae5fd09942c72
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Pike County · 2022

How calculated

Pike County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05109:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f992cb9c6a40cbe5442e9af06945
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
15,969 acres

Pike County · 2022

How calculated

Pike County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05109:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
15,969 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:678a8b6148fef178f66c09592a4d
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
205 farms

Pike County · 2022

How calculated

Pike County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05109:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
205 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f9b6292619adccabb498899b9471
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
20 acres

Pike County · 2022

How calculated

Pike County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05109:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6c3efa9cff6c1e2a9793e4279cba
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
4 farms

Pike County · 2022

How calculated

Pike County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05109:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:89f21b9d8f9cd3a4eccd124b4845
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.1 percent

Pike County · 2022

How calculated

Pike County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05109:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dfd44c5b3f1fb6a22b9f57f8145d
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
31,227 tons

Pike County · 2022

How calculated

Pike County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
05109:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
31,227 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f7140f5e376cd665f16e3bba8007
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation58.4 in
How calculated

MURFREESBORO 1W, AR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8bb0e844b1d94aaa09fe235c9b4d
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature60.1 °F
How calculated

MURFREESBORO 1W, AR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:845fec05c6cb7e735ec5c072f6f7
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance11.1 miles
How calculated

MURFREESBORO 1W, AR US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Daisy reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ad6eaeb867042e3210c14727c079
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
69.4 percent

Daisy · 2026

How calculated

Daisy · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dfbac1e9afe5480f6d516e879d42
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0.4 percent

Daisy · 2026

How calculated

Daisy · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:165e5c6106e336650e88284a49cb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Daisy · 2026

How calculated

Daisy · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eacc55527f709181151df1cb5908
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Daisy · 2026

How calculated

Daisy · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:963ad231f448eff2ccaa2c548a0d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
34 0-100

Daisy · 2026

How calculated

Daisy · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b056f203025517f2baaa327a7226
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Daisy · 2026

How calculated

Daisy · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5bd17825b1fdde2906ee2919e99f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
27 weeks

Daisy · 2026

How calculated

Daisy · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b69b83610a9a865df8db82a77cad
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
61 0-100

Daisy · 2026

How calculated

Daisy · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6aba268b0ab133593456f1f30332
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
79.1 0-100

Daisy · 2026

How calculated

Daisy · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:319483259933901df1898575bbe7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
10.9 0-100

Daisy · 2026

How calculated

Daisy · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:93891e0f43fd5d5424e692f03bb3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
56.7 percent

Daisy · 2026

How calculated

Daisy · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:12c7a8ef5d066e3057a8f8eeddaf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
38.7 percent

Daisy · 2026

How calculated

Daisy · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:93ad4aeb945f0874
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4061b067d81b950203ba27c9813c
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

61.6sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Foreman, Arkansas51.9 mi1,438 ac97.42. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Alleene, Arkansas44.2 mi1,393 ac95.53. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Winthrop, Arkansas45 mi1,386 ac954. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Red Lick, Texas57.3 mi1,112 ac80.15. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Ashdown, Arkansas44.7 mi1,076 ac78.96. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Wilton, Arkansas41.6 mi1,066 ac78.57. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Haworth, Oklahoma59.2 mi977 ac738. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Texarkana, Arkansas57 mi887 ac68.49. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Texarkana, Texas57.9 mi741 ac60.810. Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Nash, Texas59 mi726 ac59.9
Source hay

Need Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay in Daisy?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay markets in Pike Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Daisy

Alfalfa Hay in Daisy, ArkansasExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Daisy, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Daisy, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Daisy, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Daisy, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Daisy, ArkansasContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Sorghum-Sudan / Sudan Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.