Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Ryegrass Hay
in Paxville, South Carolina

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Ryegrass hay serving Paxville.

Request Ryegrass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint20,795.5 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth83.5 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence74.2 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty38.8 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal55.7 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Paxville, but it does not measure how much is specifically Ryegrass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 20,796 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 84th percentile among 4,275 analyzed South Carolina localities and the 94th percentile nationally. Clarendon County reports 5,673 acres of reported hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Mayesville, South Carolina, 19 miles away with 29,442 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 20.5% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 84th percentile among analyzed South Carolina localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Ryegrass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

74.2 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 8,825 acres · 24th regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2009: 7,710 acres · 38th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2010: 10,788 acres · 34th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2011: 0 acres · 51st regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 10,951 acres · 31st regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2013: 10,142 acres · 27th regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2014: 9,064 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 48th national percentile2015: 7,320 acres · 20th regional percentile · 48th national percentile2016: 7,907 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 50th national percentile2017: 11,905 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2018: 17,227 acres · 29th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2019: 22,763 acres · 29th regional percentile · 61st national percentile2020: 28,070 acres · 37th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2021: 26,345 acres · 58th regional percentile · 72nd national percentile2022: 28,742 acres · 66th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2023: 30,159 acres · 69th regional percentile · 75th national percentile2024: 1,894 acres · 69th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2025: 20,796 acres · 84th regional percentile · 94th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

83.5production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
1,819 head

Clarendon County · 2022

How calculated

Clarendon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45027:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,819 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:88f77b3c9185a216185b48413e13
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
3,060 head

Clarendon County · 2022

How calculated

Clarendon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45027:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,060 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f3e45781475c018f68ad4d10018c
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Clarendon County · 2022

How calculated

Clarendon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45027:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4d9279a7d50b47b31b334246a27d
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
262 head

Clarendon County · 2022

How calculated

Clarendon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45027:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
262 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:01d3fe772d478b3f1389a4caa8d9
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Clarendon County · 2022

How calculated

Clarendon County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45027:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:93aeeabc902dda222a03e78d5929
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
277 head

Clarendon County · 2022

How calculated

Clarendon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45027:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
277 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:10df01866746b4b4942198a57758
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
5,673 acres

Clarendon County · 2022

How calculated

Clarendon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45027:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,673 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cf8b5bc2159974ba0b4bce249f87
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
80 farms

Clarendon County · 2022

How calculated

Clarendon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45027:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
80 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ff357871960f92632052981936af
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
1,333 acres

Clarendon County · 2022

How calculated

Clarendon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45027:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,333 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ae49bccb74e5f9152fd98c6437af
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
15 farms

Clarendon County · 2022

How calculated

Clarendon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45027:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
15 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c3bf1c7177bb35912f3e56a7a68d
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
23.5 percent

Clarendon County · 2022

How calculated

Clarendon County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45027:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3ee4d9612e6816f23493a28cda0d
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
14,423 tons

Clarendon County · 2022

How calculated

Clarendon County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45027:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14,423 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3e75b81dd898d366dcfc882c5427
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Ryegrass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation55.7 in
How calculated

MANNING, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6ffa27c938410a10e9177d8693bc
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature63.1 °F
How calculated

MANNING, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c33d9433cbac4a2d49d7916c255d
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance9.6 miles
How calculated

MANNING, SC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Paxville reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cad9bf9c90338dae186115161729
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Paxville · 2026

How calculated

Paxville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6506c91ee017b108ecd3e9ae1abc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
20.5 percent

Paxville · 2026

How calculated

Paxville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fca75f134dca43216ace2597cf43
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Paxville · 2026

How calculated

Paxville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:87189eee701659c3d236381e9a3b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Paxville · 2026

How calculated

Paxville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fbe31b60b0fc9a43497936365bec
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
44.1 0-100

Paxville · 2026

How calculated

Paxville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3891d93a569fcb83b10b2c58f95c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Paxville · 2026

How calculated

Paxville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:256b546fef552a356dcff919adb9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
34 weeks

Paxville · 2026

How calculated

Paxville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:03d9a3fb42a15e202086c04fb1f9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Paxville · 2026

How calculated

Paxville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e22d0d6da23809c66878ec0241ac
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
39.6 0-100

Paxville · 2026

How calculated

Paxville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0dee2bfa653d97a32031997a74bd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
58.1 0-100

Paxville · 2026

How calculated

Paxville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0c16e56bacdd9bda99cb42c72fe6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
66.2 percent

Paxville · 2026

How calculated

Paxville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e857dd2c1995d80a2f06193bcad8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
38.8 percent

Paxville · 2026

How calculated

Paxville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:48dd56cecc2d6321895410bc69fd
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

38.8sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Ryegrass Hay in Paxville?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Ryegrass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Ryegrass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.