Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Orchardgrass Hay
in Cedarville, California

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Orchardgrass hay serving Cedarville.

Request Orchardgrass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint7,518.1 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth87.4 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence81.7 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty41.2 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal13.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Cedarville, but it does not measure how much is specifically Orchardgrass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 7,518 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 87th percentile among 14,571 analyzed California localities and the 59th percentile nationally. Modoc County reports 46,115 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Bonanza, Oregon, 79 miles away with 23,806 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 87th percentile among analyzed California localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Orchardgrass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

81.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 37,035 acres · 97th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2009: 26,549 acres · 98th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2010: 51,253 acres · 98th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2011: 45,791 acres · 99th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2012: 28,431 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 76th national percentile2013: 36,954 acres · 98th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2014: 41,307 acres · 96th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2015: 4,710 acres · 79th regional percentile · 41st national percentile2016: 13,175 acres · 89th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2017: 22,675 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 64th national percentile2018: 43,074 acres · 95th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2019: 23,104 acres · 94th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2020: 21,696 acres · 91st regional percentile · 59th national percentile2021: 21,652 acres · 91st regional percentile · 66th national percentile2022: 21,154 acres · 90th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2023: 23,850 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 68th national percentile2024: 2,518 acres · 79th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2025: 7,518 acres · 87th regional percentile · 59th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

87.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
32,458 head

Modoc County · 2022

How calculated

Modoc County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06049:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
32,458 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7a6694f2076dea37715f96e65903
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
56,498 head

Modoc County · 2022

How calculated

Modoc County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06049:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
56,498 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5d062aa1b66fe9f709cf35e77748
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
9 head

Modoc County · 2022

How calculated

Modoc County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06049:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c6c95ee4374781de49ef154f9ca9
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,062 head

Modoc County · 2022

How calculated

Modoc County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06049:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,062 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6c2852dec228e3eea033ebf02d1e
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Modoc County · 2022

How calculated

Modoc County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06049:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b456038084b7d4fe978246c2e25a
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Modoc County · 2022

How calculated

Modoc County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06049:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e4795a0ee5740380e82b1243c7ef
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
115,416 acres

Modoc County · 2022

How calculated

Modoc County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06049:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
115,416 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e4edbdc771d30d5068da36d7b406
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
210 farms

Modoc County · 2022

How calculated

Modoc County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06049:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
210 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fd7cb438b082d77d1779f06c1a6a
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
95,938 acres

Modoc County · 2022

How calculated

Modoc County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06049:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
95,938 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2e01e5314eb207f1d01d448a1fe1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
197 farms

Modoc County · 2022

How calculated

Modoc County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06049:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
197 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8898ca620112bf5835d938e29a19
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
83.1 percent

Modoc County · 2022

How calculated

Modoc County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06049:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:34dcdbf269bf4dcdda675fde0417
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
430,062 tons

Modoc County · 2022

How calculated

Modoc County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
06049:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
430,062 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2600a05b30d02aec6ece685597e7
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Orchardgrass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation13.1 in
How calculated

CEDARVILLE, CA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:042608e7164d90875c0150f3d0cb
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature50.1 °F
How calculated

CEDARVILLE, CA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:053b4b006e5d5e81f1a0bacfd3bd
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance0.3 miles
How calculated

CEDARVILLE, CA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Cedarville reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:41fa7d7c6b90be316356985d7e94
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Cedarville · 2026

How calculated

Cedarville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:52d2d7e883e5feb48646dcd38008
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Cedarville · 2026

How calculated

Cedarville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:340dd8dd03b8cb9955bcfce384fb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Cedarville · 2026

How calculated

Cedarville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bfdbbdcfacdc27472a8109d8cc3d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Cedarville · 2026

How calculated

Cedarville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d6842bebddb8f9f910f634b52cd3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
40 0-100

Cedarville · 2026

How calculated

Cedarville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9c15758be5a9e7be5b7dd11ad5a8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Cedarville · 2026

How calculated

Cedarville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a56b7874203d802d48cbc00b34ff
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
1 weeks

Cedarville · 2026

How calculated

Cedarville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c3d7c3119dc3dcf8abfe48612bc3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
23.5 0-100

Cedarville · 2026

How calculated

Cedarville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0428cba313ec3ce8b93f50b8a9ff
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Cedarville · 2026

How calculated

Cedarville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a2148b5dc49abadda612c5405457
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
27.4 0-100

Cedarville · 2026

How calculated

Cedarville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ceaba01bed94fb90ce6f67437d6f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
12.2 percent

Cedarville · 2026

How calculated

Cedarville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5ee5a42cfdc6d76a322a65314efd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Cedarville · 2026

How calculated

Cedarville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:1e76f26eb1529146
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1da7858733b4bcf18b40693c27aa
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

41.2sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Orchardgrass Hay in Cedarville?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Orchardgrass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Orchardgrass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.