Oats crop context
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Oat Hay
in Frankewing, Tennessee
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Oat hay serving Frankewing.
Request Oat Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies oats crop context around Frankewing, but it does not measure how much is specifically Oat hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 24 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 58th percentile among 504 analyzed Tennessee localities and the 26th percentile nationally. Giles County reports 37,488 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Fayetteville, Tennessee, 17 miles away with 66 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED
The 25-mile mapped oats crop context footprint ranks at the 58th percentile among analyzed Tennessee localities.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader oats crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Oat Hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local oats crop context footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
0 ac
10 mi
9 ac
25 mi
24 ac
50 mi
67 ac
100 mi
614 ac
150 mi
1,334 ac
250 mi
13,793 ac
Within 25 miles24mapped acres · 0.002% of radius · 2025
58th percentile among 504 analyzed Tennessee localities · 26th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Frankewing · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
106- Evidence
- FAMILY
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 106 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:10a2008d22daf1a0719c8bd03733- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
66.6 / 100 persistence · MODERATE
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
66.9production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) headGiles County · 2022
How calculated
Giles County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
47055:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- (D) head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:67e095d91b07b48174e9afe6ca5b- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
55,682 headGiles County · 2022
How calculated
Giles County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
47055:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 55,682 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:cfa55af2f665882d378e25ba08b3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) headGiles County · 2022
How calculated
Giles County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
47055:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- (D) head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:fbe506a59b42c5b70036d13030a2- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,690 headGiles County · 2022
How calculated
Giles County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
47055:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 1,690 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:39ada3886a06c00b44ec8c19bce9- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_headGiles County · 2022
How calculated
Giles County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
47055:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:e795c510669725689ba983891203- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
882 headGiles County · 2022
How calculated
Giles County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
47055:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 882 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d515b3a3db4f83fc34208a606c94- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
37,995 acresGiles County · 2022
How calculated
Giles County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
47055:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 37,995 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:424a2ec156d90822a00113d65343- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
732 farmsGiles County · 2022
How calculated
Giles County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
47055:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 732 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:2c8666d2aa964183bfe4591fba54- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
84 acresGiles County · 2022
How calculated
Giles County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
47055:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 84 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:bddb3f6b2f34adcf2b16a4f8235c- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
5 farmsGiles County · 2022
How calculated
Giles County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
47055:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 5 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:8cf4ceeb858ecb7cc072e0f78cb0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.2 percentGiles County · 2022
How calculated
Giles County · county
Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
47055:hay:irrigated-share:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:aeb9297368d3fd1adaf6e500336e- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
74,590 tonsGiles County · 2022
How calculated
Giles County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
47055:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 74,590 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:6e8f3f61d0122759dbe20e2f4712- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Oat Hay benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation58.6 in
How calculated
PULASKI WWTP, TN US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:01614d8597e61e7774ca4378b145- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature57.3 °F
How calculated
PULASKI WWTP, TN US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:9fefc4bc6b8ba9e69c302fe11238- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance10.5 miles
How calculated
PULASKI WWTP, TN US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Frankewing reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:782e21f51295b4978eb1fa8443f6- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percentFrankewing · 2026
How calculated
Frankewing · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:2e0ba4c4fda14df9f6a5d993d171- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percentFrankewing · 2026
How calculated
Frankewing · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:d6f3fadb875c9d2c9bd12265c7ac- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percentFrankewing · 2026
How calculated
Frankewing · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:a72d805615305f0043c667a1ba9f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 categoryFrankewing · 2026
How calculated
Frankewing · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:c467436745f1380d5d5be51a626a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
19.2 0-100Frankewing · 2026
How calculated
Frankewing · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:48c28b271601ddb26223e9e9b7a2- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING categoryFrankewing · 2026
How calculated
Frankewing · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:30cac8ddd067a211782abea75a1d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
14 weeksFrankewing · 2026
How calculated
Frankewing · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:a1623142542b0fca6f93211395b5- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
24.2 0-100Frankewing · 2026
How calculated
Frankewing · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:1e25ebe9d167ec793c76efac4669- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100Frankewing · 2026
How calculated
Frankewing · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:bdb97af3e4fd8a148f0a79cb4f8f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100Frankewing · 2026
How calculated
Frankewing · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:0063012a458df979c2af438094fc- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
40.3 percentFrankewing · 2026
How calculated
Frankewing · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:da21ca6a2b4fb7f542010a3d776c- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
8.1 percentFrankewing · 2026
How calculated
Frankewing · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:b02141c5e937c4e7db8d3e1f5c91- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
46.3sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Oat Hay in Fayetteville, Tennessee16.9 mi66 ac98.92. Oat Hay in Flintville, Tennessee26.6 mi66 ac98.73. Oat Hay in Park City, Tennessee17.4 mi65 ac98.44. Oat Hay in Lynchburg, Moore County metropolitan government, Tennessee28.9 mi64 ac96.35. Oat Hay in Taft, Tennessee14 mi60 ac92.56. Oat Hay in Petersburg, Tennessee14.9 mi57 ac89.27. Oat Hay in Hazel Green, Alabama24.9 mi53 ac83.98. Oat Hay in Meridianville, Alabama27 mi51 ac819. Oat Hay in Normandy, Tennessee38.2 mi50 ac79.910. Oat Hay in Moores Mill, Alabama30.4 mi48 ac77.8Source hay
Need Oat Hay in Frankewing?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Frankewing
Alfalfa Hay in Frankewing, TennesseeExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Frankewing, TennesseeContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Frankewing, TennesseeContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Frankewing, TennesseeContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Frankewing, TennesseeContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Frankewing, TennesseeContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Oat Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.