Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Oat Hay
in Eagleville, Tennessee

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Oat hay serving Eagleville.

Request Oat Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint0 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Oats crop context

Production depth46.1 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence57.8 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty58.3 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal57.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies oats crop context around Eagleville, but it does not measure how much is specifically Oat hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 0 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 25th percentile among 504 analyzed Tennessee localities and the 17th percentile nationally. Rutherford County reports 28,550 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Greenbrier, Tennessee, 48 miles away with 286 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped oats crop context footprint ranks at the 25th percentile among analyzed Tennessee localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader oats crop context; it does not identify how much is specifically Oat Hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local oats crop context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

57.8 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 33 acres · 76th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2009: 25 acres · 76th regional percentile · 35th national percentile2010: 9 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 27th national percentile2011: 101 acres · 97th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2012: 37 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 38th national percentile2013: 53 acres · 95th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2014: 12 acres · 78th regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2015: 13 acres · 81st regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2016: 83 acres · 98th regional percentile · 49th national percentile2017: 23 acres · 94th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2018: 39 acres · 97th regional percentile · 41st national percentile2019: 1 acres · 38th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2020: 5 acres · 47th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2021: 1 acres · 49th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2022: 2 acres · 41st regional percentile · 15th national percentile2023: 12 acres · 70th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2024: 0 acres · 29th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2025: 0 acres · 25th regional percentile · 17th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

46.1production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
11,062 head

Rutherford County · 2022

How calculated

Rutherford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47149:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11,062 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8eca3da49b009055bc3303e173ba
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
19,867 head

Rutherford County · 2022

How calculated

Rutherford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47149:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
19,867 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:567d3af8a6ff00c1b4588639114d
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
382 head

Rutherford County · 2022

How calculated

Rutherford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47149:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
382 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a28c14c1de441282f5dac5eaab11
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
2,056 head

Rutherford County · 2022

How calculated

Rutherford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47149:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,056 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:69550a2e39463b9e66dde61a9b2b
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Rutherford County · 2022

How calculated

Rutherford County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47149:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8a4d02ad9acaa016231124ac95da
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
2,081 head

Rutherford County · 2022

How calculated

Rutherford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47149:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,081 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0cf0806c7362f1ba2168dc9b30eb
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
29,266 acres

Rutherford County · 2022

How calculated

Rutherford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47149:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
29,266 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:254cdfa591cdc782ee9a8c583e30
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
593 farms

Rutherford County · 2022

How calculated

Rutherford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47149:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
593 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5578eed5f6ec384f14f34aea0c4a
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
944 acres

Rutherford County · 2022

How calculated

Rutherford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47149:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
944 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9fa4a03f29ef6b907ff3332e62d3
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
10 farms

Rutherford County · 2022

How calculated

Rutherford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47149:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fffbe9700c158c712ed820594ea2
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
3.2 percent

Rutherford County · 2022

How calculated

Rutherford County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47149:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3075891834be2bab7c4937454686
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
66,584 tons

Rutherford County · 2022

How calculated

Rutherford County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47149:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
66,584 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:17a303afd79375c8939c8516c46d
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Oat Hay benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation57.9 in
How calculated

CHRISTIANA 5W, TN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:33eeadfef6d904df599760bdbf14
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature57.2 °F
How calculated

CHRISTIANA 5W, TN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6dc1011c240d720771e979693bec
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance9.7 miles
How calculated

CHRISTIANA 5W, TN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Eagleville reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9bb97671374401bf6e8d28745b59
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Eagleville · 2026

How calculated

Eagleville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cfbd173ac2d744cd9aea326d6751
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Eagleville · 2026

How calculated

Eagleville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7ce006fa8da9d473416ce6017a24
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Eagleville · 2026

How calculated

Eagleville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:59a427f59ce062e9d47249e4eafa
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Eagleville · 2026

How calculated

Eagleville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b0502cb919f9223f67a233c366b4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
1.3 0-100

Eagleville · 2026

How calculated

Eagleville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7200564f42866351b4dc4ccee913
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Eagleville · 2026

How calculated

Eagleville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f4a93e9a1d24db427ad8929fae40
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
15 weeks

Eagleville · 2026

How calculated

Eagleville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a70a1a2be6096f06960be3d720c7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Eagleville · 2026

How calculated

Eagleville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5798cd969315c5ffe903dcb17b5d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
7.9 0-100

Eagleville · 2026

How calculated

Eagleville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c84312378f949b50f84b1fcf9529
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0.3 0-100

Eagleville · 2026

How calculated

Eagleville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c2115724a5d161e70b5af940d3ae
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
28.3 percent

Eagleville · 2026

How calculated

Eagleville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:067d75ac8107a07b316487eac077
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
10.8 percent

Eagleville · 2026

How calculated

Eagleville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f57c4a956106e0d307258aaf5ba6
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

58.3sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Oat Hay in Eagleville?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Oat Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Oat Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 86 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.