Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Native / Prairie Grass Hay
in Lander, Wyoming

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Native / Prairie Grass hay serving Lander.

Request Native / Prairie Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint11,506.3 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth77.7 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence71.6 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty41.8 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal13.2 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Lander, but it does not measure how much is specifically Native / Prairie Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 11,506 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 75th percentile among 1,845 analyzed Wyoming localities and the 78th percentile nationally. Fremont County reports 15,481 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Daniel, Wyoming, 68 miles away with 43,085 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 63% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 75th percentile among analyzed Wyoming localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Native / Prairie Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

71.6 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 12,549 acres · 48th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2009: 8,492 acres · 24th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2010: 9,571 acres · 27th regional percentile · 61st national percentile2011: 0 acres · 61st regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 61st regional percentile · 19th national percentile2013: 17,598 acres · 56th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2014: 8,474 acres · 25th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2015: 11,916 acres · 47th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2016: 14,743 acres · 51st regional percentile · 61st national percentile2017: 15,058 acres · 47th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2018: 17,854 acres · 45th regional percentile · 56th national percentile2019: 16,453 acres · 45th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2020: 20,326 acres · 49th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2021: 24,106 acres · 54th regional percentile · 69th national percentile2022: 29,986 acres · 58th regional percentile · 75th national percentile2023: 26,520 acres · 55th regional percentile · 71st national percentile2024: 1,381 acres · 57th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2025: 11,506 acres · 75th regional percentile · 78th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

77.7production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
54,022 head

Fremont County · 2022

How calculated

Fremont County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56013:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
54,022 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:50b0e101230ddf0c59fbe9327aff
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
85,784 head

Fremont County · 2022

How calculated

Fremont County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56013:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
85,784 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:26b0b4455e897c8e43b45ea62295
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
451 head

Fremont County · 2022

How calculated

Fremont County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56013:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
451 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e13b11f002b99eb71e42a9fbbfa2
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
5,414 head

Fremont County · 2022

How calculated

Fremont County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56013:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,414 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9b7e63afebbb443405d0ea2bd939
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Fremont County · 2022

How calculated

Fremont County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56013:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:33ba95177ec34de0a454e8578d4c
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
664 head

Fremont County · 2022

How calculated

Fremont County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56013:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
664 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:32ade218cac9e984e954d92a685b
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
71,312 acres

Fremont County · 2022

How calculated

Fremont County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56013:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
71,312 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:97dbec20d4b25f9411d988af0b7f
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
646 farms

Fremont County · 2022

How calculated

Fremont County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56013:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
646 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bee8194689384325f76faf7d1255
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
68,554 acres

Fremont County · 2022

How calculated

Fremont County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56013:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
68,554 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0743b8006026efa36b6ca1d2f414
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
621 farms

Fremont County · 2022

How calculated

Fremont County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56013:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
621 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:efeddc318d0a40fe69fcc595a268
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
96.1 percent

Fremont County · 2022

How calculated

Fremont County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56013:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6615c8c65e5b3b8bd442b0e3d5e1
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
185,124 tons

Fremont County · 2022

How calculated

Fremont County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
56013:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
185,124 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6728bef9af1c21face60ea18cc70
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Native / Prairie Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation13.2 in
How calculated

LANDER HUNT FLD AP, WY US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:700a476d2c05002cc0f595699dae
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature45.1 °F
How calculated

LANDER HUNT FLD AP, WY US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ca319b0436ca8f976d68810926b6
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance1.1 miles
How calculated

LANDER HUNT FLD AP, WY US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Lander reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:82580d5fc7eedf55d13c03b3955f
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Lander · 2026

How calculated

Lander · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:93ce83445a0dd0cb1667c9a39b91
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
63 percent

Lander · 2026

How calculated

Lander · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:821b4afef3bc31cd97b6f2a2edae
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
28.5 percent

Lander · 2026

How calculated

Lander · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4278dea77a500a2df4257641da41
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Lander · 2026

How calculated

Lander · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8b2471968448dcbc8df719b549b5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
58.3 0-100

Lander · 2026

How calculated

Lander · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:564d247d56832bc8e09164578084
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Lander · 2026

How calculated

Lander · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4757600c96636a458bedf7bbc807
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
29 weeks

Lander · 2026

How calculated

Lander · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:288df347a4a7ebc101d59e62f0d4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
59.1 0-100

Lander · 2026

How calculated

Lander · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cc1922585ae9fceb162a03db5037
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
33.5 0-100

Lander · 2026

How calculated

Lander · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:32229f45d10af660648e914628f7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
64.9 0-100

Lander · 2026

How calculated

Lander · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1332c0b7e956b07a9cde595866fb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
65.6 percent

Lander · 2026

How calculated

Lander · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3264204a6ed3e5d3818606846278
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
40.4 percent

Lander · 2026

How calculated

Lander · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:a94b19bf06f8d2a1
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a37b87b58deb9083c64153760a5b
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

41.8sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Native / Prairie Grass Hay in Lander?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Native / Prairie Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Native / Prairie Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.