Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Mixed Grass Hay
in Charleston, Tennessee

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Mixed Grass hay serving Charleston.

Request Mixed Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint13,511.8 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth87.5 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence76.7 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty35.8 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal57.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Charleston, but it does not measure how much is specifically Mixed Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 13,512 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 90th percentile among 4,536 analyzed Tennessee localities and the 83rd percentile nationally. Bradley County reports 13,613 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Niota, Tennessee, 20 miles away with 16,568 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 90th percentile among analyzed Tennessee localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Mixed Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

76.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 47,582 acres · 49th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2009: 25,469 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 77th national percentile2010: 96,117 acres · 52nd regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2011: 576 acres · 67th regional percentile · 41st national percentile2012: 922 acres · 67th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2013: 23,599 acres · 50th regional percentile · 71st national percentile2014: 16,657 acres · 66th regional percentile · 61st national percentile2015: 46,121 acres · 71st regional percentile · 86th national percentile2016: 40,679 acres · 69th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2017: 43,479 acres · 66th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2018: 48,743 acres · 66th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2019: 55,578 acres · 59th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2020: 57,958 acres · 60th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2021: 36,894 acres · 61st regional percentile · 81st national percentile2022: 39,476 acres · 67th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2023: 40,047 acres · 68th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2024: 100 acres · 26th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2025: 13,512 acres · 90th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

87.5production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
9,737 head

Bradley County · 2022

How calculated

Bradley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47011:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,737 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:29cceafa0389bfd3023b6a77e82e
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
20,552 head

Bradley County · 2022

How calculated

Bradley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47011:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20,552 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7ddc5342f1b74b35330676e9d57e
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
576 head

Bradley County · 2022

How calculated

Bradley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47011:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
576 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:43f19f3a038cb65636becd0ed18b
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
725 head

Bradley County · 2022

How calculated

Bradley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47011:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
725 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:166f743474b45b4295e129d4574f
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Bradley County · 2022

How calculated

Bradley County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47011:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:32a1238d90bbe3dc85059c5561ce
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
315 head

Bradley County · 2022

How calculated

Bradley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47011:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
315 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:72e5991d0c66e6705737beae52d7
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
13,951 acres

Bradley County · 2022

How calculated

Bradley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47011:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13,951 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3d84cef5b78e9df97e7d882d5c90
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
307 farms

Bradley County · 2022

How calculated

Bradley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47011:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
307 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bf383a2f1f84020f6120d7d0cd1d
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
60 acres

Bradley County · 2022

How calculated

Bradley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47011:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
60 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e5b566f677ca576851093e9d4c43
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farms

Bradley County · 2022

How calculated

Bradley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47011:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0f647fdcb6345c60b4f898a711fc
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.4 percent

Bradley County · 2022

How calculated

Bradley County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47011:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2cc57cff69384516835a15c711b2
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
27,531 tons

Bradley County · 2022

How calculated

Bradley County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47011:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
27,531 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bd1e0e1099707d7392745f9abdd2
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Mixed Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation57.6 in
How calculated

CLEVELAND FLTR PLT, TN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6ef5d2c3f640da6927fcda0e1e5c
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature59.6 °F
How calculated

CLEVELAND FLTR PLT, TN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8929ef8dd71d6a3b7894e885321b
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance4.9 miles
How calculated

CLEVELAND FLTR PLT, TN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Charleston reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3807793ec4db9150b356cbc3fc3e
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f9715787f32cbfdd808ab324b369
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5c2fe9518c8d5acede1af84213f8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dce1209719b276fa65ca7e68b715
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ac82c6f8155a07ec254153030838
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c574d7fc78c7e0c9341ff893b02a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:055b8c4e036a86c0739aec570153
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
33 weeks

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:edcf38a9f0bcf54cbfb14383cf90
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
71 0-100

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:927a7a9619c929bfc3c5b940a71f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
73.8 0-100

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:414026735ae6459083be409d73bd
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
28.5 0-100

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0841764cb4015b797ea92d54f8c7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
71.2 percent

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:41751f3d10d1982ea710a1714bbf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
56.4 percent

Charleston · 2026

How calculated

Charleston · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:01749314352a4031d5ef9d500130
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

35.8sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Mixed Grass Hay in Charleston?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Mixed Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Mixed Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.