HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Mixed Grass Hay
in McClellanville, South Carolina

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Mixed Grass hay serving McClellanville.

Request Mixed Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint397.4 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth39.4 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence75.8 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty63.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal55.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Mixed Grass Hay Quotes Sell Mixed Grass Near McClellanville
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around McClellanville, but it does not measure how much is specifically Mixed Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 397 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 3rd percentile among 4,275 analyzed South Carolina localities and the 9th percentile nationally. Charleston County reports 580 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Mayesville, South Carolina, 75 miles away with 29,442 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 14.1% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 3rd percentile among analyzed South Carolina localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Mixed Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles397mapped acres · 0.032% of radius · 2025

3th percentile among 4,275 analyzed South Carolina localities · 9th percentile nationally.

How calculated

McClellanville · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
1787
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1787 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:43392bde76fa33c846887027490c
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

75.8 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 241 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 11th national percentile2009: 105 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 8th national percentile2010: 621 acres · 0th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2011: 0 acres · 51st regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 355 acres · 4th regional percentile · 27th national percentile2013: 416 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 16th national percentile2014: 399 acres · 1st regional percentile · 15th national percentile2015: 281 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 10th national percentile2016: 237 acres · 1st regional percentile · 9th national percentile2017: 570 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 12th national percentile2018: 634 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 9th national percentile2019: 1,027 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 12th national percentile2020: 1,072 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 12th national percentile2021: 944 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 13th national percentile2022: 732 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 11th national percentile2023: 848 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 12th national percentile2024: 412 acres · 48th regional percentile · 55th national percentile2025: 397 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 9th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

39.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8b7764989ef1e6475fe8a9522ef7
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
1,438 head

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,438 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:24907ad7cfa17857abe8dc6bd939
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:05dbc8c69aa269925eb9b30411fb
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
503 head

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
503 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c9da0a360b512a8ba76f3292076e
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:39ecf20c02241529f0f65f5476ba
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
188 head

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
188 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bcdbc48b93599218ca9ac5cea935
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
580 acres

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
580 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:534751cd3695e3f114b17653299f
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
20 farms

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c88e1aaa68058d8e20074c2c7467
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:430625aa0d0c3c6d855822cc915b
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e69057db728a35d33fd0642deab5
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
1,264 tons

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,264 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:831d1ec8f74860a839a557cd5489
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.2 tons/acre

Charleston County · 2022

How calculated

Charleston County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45019:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b47c5186dd75dd6ed6cd23995351
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Mixed Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation55.6 in
How calculated

MCCLELLANVILLE 7 NE, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:51937691c0fdf486c1bea042bd72
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature65.1 °F
How calculated

MCCLELLANVILLE 7 NE, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:392196dfb4f641534d185adc34b2
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7.5 miles
How calculated

MCCLELLANVILLE 7 NE, SC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from McClellanville reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a9da5bca99ca334e282c39670929
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

McClellanville · 2026

How calculated

McClellanville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6e87550480acb2d7ec0ce4e697ba
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
14.1 percent

McClellanville · 2026

How calculated

McClellanville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:564c3828a63898f623cb01e5e3c1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

McClellanville · 2026

How calculated

McClellanville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c7f775049ac6ad46eda6bde5253b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

McClellanville · 2026

How calculated

McClellanville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:73278d0b97f3045aa2a0306d44c2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
42.8 0-100

McClellanville · 2026

How calculated

McClellanville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:47fe9b237d05af0f1e70820fa6b4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

McClellanville · 2026

How calculated

McClellanville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5ea2c4f6ad355c93bd0106238221
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
34 weeks

McClellanville · 2026

How calculated

McClellanville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ce92f85396cebe7c3a4f5747b4bb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
80 0-100

McClellanville · 2026

How calculated

McClellanville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b1f6375cfde347e210f6b7a18746
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

McClellanville · 2026

How calculated

McClellanville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c90da7a796328f5bd82e0bcd24f4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
66.3 0-100

McClellanville · 2026

How calculated

McClellanville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ac2ebb102c045169516028a59590
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
64.3 percent

McClellanville · 2026

How calculated

McClellanville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5d609901ec430fb59a73d54aa5d6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
53.9 percent

McClellanville · 2026

How calculated

McClellanville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:64ff7388d14b8623b8cf1cad817f
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

63.6sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Mixed Grass Hay in Mayesville, South Carolina75.2 mi29,442 ac96.22. Mixed Grass Hay in Shiloh, South Carolina67.5 mi27,272 ac91.13. Mixed Grass Hay in East Sumter, South Carolina75 mi26,309 ac88.34. Mixed Grass Hay in Turbeville, South Carolina63.8 mi25,964 ac87.95. Mixed Grass Hay in South Sumter, South Carolina74.6 mi24,349 ac83.36. Mixed Grass Hay in Ketchuptown, South Carolina72.9 mi23,332 ac80.87. Mixed Grass Hay in Lakewood, South Carolina72.4 mi23,296 ac80.78. Mixed Grass Hay in Alcolu, South Carolina63.8 mi22,355 ac78.89. Mixed Grass Hay in Olanta, South Carolina64.5 mi22,242 ac78.410. Mixed Grass Hay in Privateer, South Carolina73.4 mi22,003 ac77.4
Source hay

Need Mixed Grass Hay in McClellanville?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Mixed Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Mixed Grass Hay markets in Charleston Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in McClellanville

Alfalfa Hay in McClellanville, South CarolinaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in McClellanville, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in McClellanville, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in McClellanville, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in McClellanville, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in McClellanville, South CarolinaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Mixed Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.