Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Mixed Grass Hay
in Irmo, South Carolina

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Mixed Grass hay serving Irmo.

Request Mixed Grass Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint6,989.2 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth59.3 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence79.7 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty52.1 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal45.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Irmo, but it does not measure how much is specifically Mixed Grass hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 6,989 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 37th percentile among 4,275 analyzed South Carolina localities and the 55th percentile nationally. Lexington County reports 8,252 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Sumter, South Carolina, 47 miles away with 23,515 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 37th percentile among analyzed South Carolina localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Mixed Grass hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

79.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 12,758 acres · 39th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2009: 7,702 acres · 38th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2010: 15,038 acres · 49th regional percentile · 67th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 51st regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 9,984 acres · 27th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2013: 10,212 acres · 27th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2014: 10,234 acres · 27th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2015: 12,371 acres · 39th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2016: 12,328 acres · 39th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2017: 15,107 acres · 31st regional percentile · 56th national percentile2018: 15,996 acres · 26th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2019: 21,266 acres · 26th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2020: 22,405 acres · 24th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2021: 17,432 acres · 27th regional percentile · 61st national percentile2022: 16,192 acres · 26th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2023: 16,975 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 60th national percentile2024: 403 acres · 48th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2025: 6,989 acres · 37th regional percentile · 55th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

59.3production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
1,432 head

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45079:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,432 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ddb28e3f58582b99b8119d34f219
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
2,493 head

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45079:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,493 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:26f9844027c2ef0a1415f209bbb3
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
4 head

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45079:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0ae324d3c259d25d8d7976e3b3f6
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
649 head

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45079:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
649 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d9d0490dcc70a0e112d6c68abe1a
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45079:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:21b8739a738421809817eda77241
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
700 head

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45079:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
700 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:60de8af9d1e101904fc3020c2b2a
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
2,754 acres

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45079:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,754 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0c6a7e87fd137c638d4505059629
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
87 farms

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45079:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
87 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:908df5dc30a19770c6278bcdac7e
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
51 acres

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45079:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
51 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bfea42967606267e6e981e567ac2
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farms

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45079:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:846358690ed6d5a0b718993b57a2
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
1.9 percent

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45079:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6a2bcb334fce03afc14b3ef7c633
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
4,449 tons

Richland County · 2022

How calculated

Richland County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
45079:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,449 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e77465dbbde1d8301c4525feb3d5
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Mixed Grass benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation45.5 in
How calculated

CEDAR CREEK 2E, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b8cf3dbc6fb9636b24f311d6560a
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature60.2 °F
How calculated

CEDAR CREEK 2E, SC US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5f98cecca339bde94e01b348104a
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance10.5 miles
How calculated

CEDAR CREEK 2E, SC US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Irmo reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6400af0b42f1863a39f31283e3fa
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0.1 percent

Irmo · 2026

How calculated

Irmo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:70da8f1464ad11350dc79de61da7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Irmo · 2026

How calculated

Irmo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:57777f4afc373fe619ce1134637f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Irmo · 2026

How calculated

Irmo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:83c95f8e5ba8e4929f5207418958
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 category

Irmo · 2026

How calculated

Irmo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3fcaa0b0ccb86422016a1aa92980
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
20 0-100

Irmo · 2026

How calculated

Irmo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3f3568abc4b23da713ccb99b819a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Irmo · 2026

How calculated

Irmo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:937cb07c81518f63e5060a5b6ed2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
19 weeks

Irmo · 2026

How calculated

Irmo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8e8b48ad6debcd362e75a3126d4b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
44.7 0-100

Irmo · 2026

How calculated

Irmo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3bfe22875a5f3ee46f6e3c7319fb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
22.6 0-100

Irmo · 2026

How calculated

Irmo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:40c19351845f182c7ceb7a8ad494
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
31 0-100

Irmo · 2026

How calculated

Irmo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c63c3150cd315c1096c62bb97f9a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
50 percent

Irmo · 2026

How calculated

Irmo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b6e51e0c1bf443c4cffe35dc7016
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
14.7 percent

Irmo · 2026

How calculated

Irmo · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:4dc31d3d7d6b8726
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0cad18f41b7c19ad13254b3660a5
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

52.1sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Mixed Grass Hay in Irmo?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Mixed Grass Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Mixed Grass Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 84 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.