Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Monroe, South Dakota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Monroe.

Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint39,338.8 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context

Production depth62.9 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence84.4 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty49.7 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal27.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Monroe, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 39,339 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 41st percentile among 485 analyzed South Dakota localities and the 91st percentile nationally. Turner County reports 3,311 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Tripp, South Dakota, 42 miles away with 66,697 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 83.3% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint ranks at the 41st percentile among analyzed South Dakota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

84.4 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 50,526 acres · 47th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2009: 46,975 acres · 47th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2010: 76,836 acres · 37th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2011: 139,423 acres · 65th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2012: 136,488 acres · 68th regional percentile · 94th national percentile2013: 114,159 acres · 65th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2014: 139,850 acres · 65th regional percentile · 96th national percentile2015: 60,296 acres · 47th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2016: 55,961 acres · 39th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2017: 66,543 acres · 47th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2018: 74,451 acres · 46th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2019: 59,687 acres · 34th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2020: 77,470 acres · 46th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2021: 56,361 acres · 35th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2022: 65,896 acres · 40th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2023: 58,165 acres · 36th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2024: 29,313 acres · 64th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2025: 39,339 acres · 41st regional percentile · 91st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

62.9production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
8,895 head

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46125:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8,895 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3a234fd568759956b4b488d922ce
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
49,307 head

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46125:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
49,307 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dd5e45d41d585bda13f52d2f5b15
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
16,225 head

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46125:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
16,225 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b6d7dc0069b118178118bcb4daa6
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
288 head

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46125:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
288 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9ad32007f4048de04fffc5a446cf
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46125:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e6ffef447159f7e86f0a6db98bac
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
421 head

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46125:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
421 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f28d7147f6af441130c2ee15760a
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
13,248 acres

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46125:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13,248 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d50317b8eaaf24fd311d5380329a
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
233 farms

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46125:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
233 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2503a30dd9be437de006c31f526e
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
440 acres

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46125:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
440 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8ed7ee2bb5393d1502ffb267a79a
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
11 farms

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46125:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:26490c88abefe7decf7ee584f886
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
3.3 percent

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46125:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e6e390b78ab694bbe1daed92f905
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
29,949 tons

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
46125:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
29,949 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:485e6363536da467bb56725ff93a
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation27.9 in
How calculated

BRIDGEWATER, SD US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dd7c1c0a595bb08620a183ea973b
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature46.4 °F
How calculated

BRIDGEWATER, SD US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fb9bff05e3483d80546c7cd23c81
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance15 miles
How calculated

BRIDGEWATER, SD US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Monroe reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:235c859b12ddf364ff5670ed688c
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Monroe · 2026

How calculated

Monroe · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:72aef6fc3d7012fb33adf6f6c553
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
83.3 percent

Monroe · 2026

How calculated

Monroe · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8684e6c0c3749c002e15cd4f100b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Monroe · 2026

How calculated

Monroe · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6057df63bbaaf51ba3f398c01200
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Monroe · 2026

How calculated

Monroe · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ad6a3274c2ba598457b04baede52
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
56.7 0-100

Monroe · 2026

How calculated

Monroe · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cc9b91f6e00be99c5ff6bfed03ce
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Monroe · 2026

How calculated

Monroe · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ca11f44f6b2af482ad31f4e40057
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
47 weeks

Monroe · 2026

How calculated

Monroe · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d3e9ebc56cb22743fee4b0c8b648
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
54.5 0-100

Monroe · 2026

How calculated

Monroe · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9b76bc4437b850eea2b33a4a6277
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40.1 0-100

Monroe · 2026

How calculated

Monroe · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0da7a514627792a49832434de6ba
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
40.1 0-100

Monroe · 2026

How calculated

Monroe · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e07d8a98383983e612ee67b4875d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
88.2 percent

Monroe · 2026

How calculated

Monroe · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:01cce30b69929317d2a0c12c732d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
29 percent

Monroe · 2026

How calculated

Monroe · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2092d6d3f15f2c521d1eedad4fb6
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

49.7sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Monroe?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 91 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.