HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Gardiner, Oregon

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Gardiner.

Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint127.7 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context

Production depth38.8 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence71.9 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty62.1 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal68.1 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes Sell Grass / Alfalfa Mix Near Gardiner
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Gardiner, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 128 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 4th percentile among 426 analyzed Oregon localities and the 5th percentile nationally. Douglas County reports 24,883 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Roseburg North, Oregon, 50 miles away with 15,606 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 92% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint ranks at the 4th percentile among analyzed Oregon localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles128mapped acres · 0.01% of radius · 2025

4th percentile among 426 analyzed Oregon localities · 5th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Gardiner · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
0
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
0 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e0f4ca28ee34979045f17e9c2954
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

71.9 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 863 acres · 15th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2009: 1,107 acres · 16th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2010: 1,015 acres · 16th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2011: 1,090 acres · 14th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2012: 58 acres · 4th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2013: 127 acres · 5th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2014: 376 acres · 6th regional percentile · 9th national percentile2015: 210 acres · 4th regional percentile · 5th national percentile2016: 241 acres · 7th regional percentile · 5th national percentile2017: 309 acres · 4th regional percentile · 5th national percentile2018: 513 acres · 7th regional percentile · 6th national percentile2019: 358 acres · 8th regional percentile · 5th national percentile2020: 504 acres · 7th regional percentile · 5th national percentile2021: 732 acres · 7th regional percentile · 7th national percentile2022: 606 acres · 6th regional percentile · 7th national percentile2023: 771 acres · 6th regional percentile · 7th national percentile2024: 0 acres · 1st regional percentile · 1st national percentile2025: 128 acres · 4th regional percentile · 5th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

38.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
20,171 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20,171 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cb8fbf89401a697df49575a45486
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
40,215 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
40,215 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c0924a10a3ec639550c7fa94f368
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
221 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
221 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:898e2ff7a8b613e06df293ff7763
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,911 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,911 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bd8799268a8136003b08a24b8b11
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9c70a01e0b2c24082254e04c78ac
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
2,641 head

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,641 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f044c8795a45e8f466969cf25e18
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
25,771 acres

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
25,771 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:65c412225db3a7d5807cd4f811a6
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
641 farms

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
641 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:86dad749ae2fa928e413523826e0
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
6,521 acres

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,521 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c4332ecb09894330acf86908118f
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
190 farms

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
190 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:edb9e8ddf138c4a3d1aa50baaab1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
25.3 percent

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3d5ccf2d102acd2e961540ab14eb
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
46,506 tons

Douglas County · 2022

How calculated

Douglas County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
41019:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
46,506 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fc11a3e70dc0c91f12a4a803938f
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation68.1 in
How calculated

HONEYMAN SP, OR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:989b56566892852cab5e2f9a81e6
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature50.9 °F
How calculated

HONEYMAN SP, OR US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0146d702e5353f59178b53773fce
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance13.5 miles
How calculated

HONEYMAN SP, OR US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Gardiner reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b85f539b4c6aa5d15de9addeed69
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4922899480ab991d44ae7b95ec78
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
92 percent

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:027e7191941988bae013790142aa
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
47.5 percent

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:959a24f816eb61bdffbc881fc0ed
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8ee714e2a714775d2c2365908def
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
67.9 0-100

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6ef2c7d4138fc564aaf1aa75c781
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2bd702f2c3034192ad8d6d84f954
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
33 weeks

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9af64caffa191094e54af37623b7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
65.4 0-100

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:586388192af44285dd24ea72d730
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
34.3 0-100

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cede7f02f6b855680e3275585291
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
66.1 0-100

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bea8a3904b6bd174787e11c868af
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
75.9 percent

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:de0821feb5ee051f959b5bcfd48b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
37.9 percent

Gardiner · 2026

How calculated

Gardiner · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:82177397ea6588d4
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:753bb22d9de4f7cb9cdf7003f06b
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

62.1sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Roseburg North, Oregon49.7 mi15,606 ac97.52. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Melrose, Oregon46.5 mi15,242 ac95.93. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Roseburg, Oregon51.7 mi15,134 ac95.14. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Lookingglass, Oregon48.6 mi14,834 ac93.95. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Green, Oregon54 mi14,847 ac93.76. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Winston, Oregon54.4 mi14,493 ac91.97. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Dillard, Oregon55 mi14,379 ac91.48. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Sutherlin, Oregon46 mi13,380 ac879. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Glide, Oregon60.1 mi13,463 ac86.710. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Oakland, Oregon45.8 mi12,818 ac84.3
Source hay

Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Gardiner?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay markets in Douglas Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Gardiner

Alfalfa Hay in Gardiner, OregonExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Gardiner, OregonContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Gardiner, OregonContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Gardiner, OregonContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Gardiner, OregonContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Gardiner, OregonContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 91 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.