Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Burns Flat, Oklahoma

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Burns Flat.

Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint19,180.9 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context

Production depth93.7 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence93.8 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty33.5 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal23.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Burns Flat, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 19,181 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 92nd percentile among 846 analyzed Oklahoma localities and the 71st percentile nationally. Washita County reports 30,100 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Cedar Lake, Oklahoma, 56 miles away with 27,096 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureHIGH
MarketplaceLIMITED

Burns Flat ranks among the strongest persistent mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprints in Oklahoma.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2008-30m
  • usda-cdl-2008-30m
  • usda-cdl-2009-30m
  • usda-cdl-2009-30m
  • usda-cdl-2010-30m
  • usda-cdl-2010-30m
  • usda-cdl-2011-30m
  • usda-cdl-2011-30m
  • usda-cdl-2012-30m
  • usda-cdl-2012-30m
  • usda-cdl-2013-30m
  • usda-cdl-2013-30m
  • usda-cdl-2014-30m
  • usda-cdl-2014-30m
  • usda-cdl-2015-30m
  • usda-cdl-2015-30m
  • usda-cdl-2016-30m
  • usda-cdl-2016-30m
  • usda-cdl-2017-30m
  • usda-cdl-2017-30m
  • usda-cdl-2018-30m
  • usda-cdl-2018-30m
  • usda-cdl-2019-30m
  • usda-cdl-2019-30m
  • usda-cdl-2020-30m
  • usda-cdl-2020-30m
  • usda-cdl-2021-30m
  • usda-cdl-2021-30m
  • usda-cdl-2022-30m
  • usda-cdl-2022-30m
  • usda-cdl-2023-30m
  • usda-cdl-2023-30m
  • usda-cdl-2024-30m
  • usda-cdl-2024-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

93.8 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 30,064 acres · 91st regional percentile · 61st national percentile2009: 23,966 acres · 91st regional percentile · 61st national percentile2010: 22,792 acres · 95th regional percentile · 59th national percentile2011: 28,717 acres · 96th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2012: 25,854 acres · 95th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2013: 16,070 acres · 84th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2014: 21,598 acres · 87th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2015: 21,203 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 51st national percentile2016: 22,200 acres · 89th regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2017: 21,030 acres · 89th regional percentile · 48th national percentile2018: 25,594 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 49th national percentile2019: 25,962 acres · 71st regional percentile · 49th national percentile2020: 24,777 acres · 65th regional percentile · 45th national percentile2021: 25,222 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 54th national percentile2022: 28,130 acres · 76th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2023: 27,525 acres · 71st regional percentile · 57th national percentile2024: 13,943 acres · 97th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2025: 19,181 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 71st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

93.7production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Washita County · 2022

How calculated

Washita County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40149:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1beee2b3bec05fb71536b4dc4cf1
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
83,569 head

Washita County · 2022

How calculated

Washita County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40149:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
83,569 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ad95cffeae28820154cee83369b4
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Washita County · 2022

How calculated

Washita County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40149:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:238a0d8a54672ed2cb276dba7192
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
364 head

Washita County · 2022

How calculated

Washita County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40149:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
364 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:68dbd6b1038906fc2fa0f3061862
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Washita County · 2022

How calculated

Washita County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40149:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7cc72b747f27dde8ca5548d8e6ba
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
428 head

Washita County · 2022

How calculated

Washita County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40149:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
428 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:883b55adfc8109eb93e8c1cd4913
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
36,096 acres

Washita County · 2022

How calculated

Washita County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40149:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
36,096 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:df06f5a33db60aaddb0d5b23ed98
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
240 farms

Washita County · 2022

How calculated

Washita County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40149:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
240 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:139a755d9057168c230c7f7146d2
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
1,539 acres

Washita County · 2022

How calculated

Washita County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40149:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,539 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b60d485c5ab05440f5f8b3321ae3
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
7 farms

Washita County · 2022

How calculated

Washita County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40149:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:14bb67728025b7f243887e3e05d1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
4.3 percent

Washita County · 2022

How calculated

Washita County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40149:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:751142c003204b80a5786f12302e
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
42,936 tons

Washita County · 2022

How calculated

Washita County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40149:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
42,936 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e1a001a33a52b0fd515392c52484
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation23.9 in
How calculated

CLINTON SHERMAN AP, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:226a0a14f859da17946ea9814f86
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature60 °F
How calculated

CLINTON SHERMAN AP, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ec9a43ed51d243787760ad91530b
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance10.5 miles
How calculated

CLINTON SHERMAN AP, OK US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Burns Flat reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f7b064d5d60eb2498badcc9e427c
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Burns Flat · 2026

How calculated

Burns Flat · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7c5272e7482b833226e921fdf6cc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Burns Flat · 2026

How calculated

Burns Flat · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:872bb0759e7e11dcdb7495afaef8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Burns Flat · 2026

How calculated

Burns Flat · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c0194cf1ab65ca4362c806dbebe7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D4 category

Burns Flat · 2026

How calculated

Burns Flat · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8c04eed40e6637ebcad91086195c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
96.1 0-100

Burns Flat · 2026

How calculated

Burns Flat · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:67271bbdc7076c7cff3af27df430
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Burns Flat · 2026

How calculated

Burns Flat · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:339254d5f695e13321d0659d7dcf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
42 weeks

Burns Flat · 2026

How calculated

Burns Flat · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4ad42e7a537e7435321bc1b3a46c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
94.4 0-100

Burns Flat · 2026

How calculated

Burns Flat · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b9b8c1122fdc75fcb1a9a88dd597
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
77.1 0-100

Burns Flat · 2026

How calculated

Burns Flat · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:605c4650f9203c1945e989893a5f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
87.7 0-100

Burns Flat · 2026

How calculated

Burns Flat · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a6a497a8759c2ab08cf5ce6f95c7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
76.4 percent

Burns Flat · 2026

How calculated

Burns Flat · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:764ed98d829f2f8ec05b2ae88c32
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
68.3 percent

Burns Flat · 2026

How calculated

Burns Flat · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2acd5c5b752d48b5de1a6906a228
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

33.5sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Burns Flat?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 90 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.