Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Scranton, North Dakota
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Scranton.
Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Scranton, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 66,531 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 94th percentile among 406 analyzed North Dakota localities and the 98th percentile nationally. Bowman County reports 32,040 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Bison, South Dakota, 54 miles away with 90,650 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 98.8% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED
Scranton ranks among the strongest persistent mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprints in North Dakota.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2008-30m
- usda-cdl-2008-30m
- usda-cdl-2009-30m
- usda-cdl-2009-30m
- usda-cdl-2010-30m
- usda-cdl-2010-30m
- usda-cdl-2011-30m
- usda-cdl-2011-30m
- usda-cdl-2012-30m
- usda-cdl-2012-30m
- usda-cdl-2013-30m
- usda-cdl-2013-30m
- usda-cdl-2014-30m
- usda-cdl-2014-30m
- usda-cdl-2015-30m
- usda-cdl-2015-30m
- usda-cdl-2016-30m
- usda-cdl-2016-30m
- usda-cdl-2017-30m
- usda-cdl-2017-30m
- usda-cdl-2018-30m
- usda-cdl-2018-30m
- usda-cdl-2019-30m
- usda-cdl-2019-30m
- usda-cdl-2020-30m
- usda-cdl-2020-30m
- usda-cdl-2021-30m
- usda-cdl-2021-30m
- usda-cdl-2022-30m
- usda-cdl-2022-30m
- usda-cdl-2023-30m
- usda-cdl-2023-30m
- usda-cdl-2024-30m
- usda-cdl-2024-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
1,868 ac
10 mi
8,173 ac
25 mi
66,531 ac
50 mi
216,672 ac
100 mi
840,339 ac
150 mi
1,705,180 ac
250 mi
3,534,032 ac
Within 25 miles66,531mapped acres · 5.294% of radius · 2025
94th percentile among 406 analyzed North Dakota localities · 98th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Scranton · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
160149- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 160149 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:e9eadf9d0dcbbc3409d16c85ef88- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
90.2 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
93.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
21,210 headBowman County · 2022
How calculated
Bowman County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
38011:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 21,210 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d3ba25387eab7fc3b9c40e21494b- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
38,395 headBowman County · 2022
How calculated
Bowman County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
38011:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 38,395 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d20b117347f2e81cd1f200fb696f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- headBowman County · 2022
How calculated
Bowman County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
38011:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- - head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:fdc7fe639196acb6fb740ba0cb6b- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
277 headBowman County · 2022
How calculated
Bowman County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
38011:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 277 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:0d76240b3d2139063208049a547f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
2.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_headBowman County · 2022
How calculated
Bowman County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
38011:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:25e0f2be2612d91518ee193f795d- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) headBowman County · 2022
How calculated
Bowman County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
38011:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- (D) head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:667b04d8b32349e7dea5bf8ef89b- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
95,627 acresBowman County · 2022
How calculated
Bowman County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
38011:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 95,627 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:42f9345b1c72a7fb013297c43166- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
179 farmsBowman County · 2022
How calculated
Bowman County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
38011:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 179 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:c6286c0a8845a9b75048b914632f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
373 acresBowman County · 2022
How calculated
Bowman County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
38011:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 373 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:7d4f3beb6b895e1fdefdd163d52b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farmsBowman County · 2022
How calculated
Bowman County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
38011:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 3 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:99584dff048134f01bb93ad82f57- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.4 percentBowman County · 2022
How calculated
Bowman County · county
Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
38011:hay:irrigated-share:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:cafa9a4116fcdb24f154fca5fa85- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
125,010 tonsBowman County · 2022
How calculated
Bowman County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
38011:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 125,010 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:a81b0d02fa2ba4d9ade067c462a2- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation17.1 in
How calculated
BOWMAN, ND US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:30106ae29633152a555d32df4a03- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature42.3 °F
How calculated
BOWMAN, ND US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:b0340000d6d9741366242fb64414- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance11.3 miles
How calculated
BOWMAN, ND US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Scranton reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:a451614e2c7699b6721176d540db- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percentScranton · 2026
How calculated
Scranton · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:0521cdd1f0623d4152c97654e6cb- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
98.8 percentScranton · 2026
How calculated
Scranton · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:4ea701797fe0717426c1373efffe- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
47.8 percentScranton · 2026
How calculated
Scranton · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:f491b0894a9a0059980e4b4a9fc4- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 categoryScranton · 2026
How calculated
Scranton · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:bf8c27d6f082eec9223d29b1eb40- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
69.3 0-100Scranton · 2026
How calculated
Scranton · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:4cd3fca8f4ed69e66d4d21fad59b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING categoryScranton · 2026
How calculated
Scranton · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:04cd338c47fc5b19fdb792b02529- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
11 weeksScranton · 2026
How calculated
Scranton · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:17af93995bdf857039c057f51379- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
11.5 0-100Scranton · 2026
How calculated
Scranton · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:38e458b14b9a04ca0e458a4637ba- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100Scranton · 2026
How calculated
Scranton · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:4b054fad72a56a1c9dea5ec27e9d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
59.5 0-100Scranton · 2026
How calculated
Scranton · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:f107de067ce87c1820220326407b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
21.3 percentScranton · 2026
How calculated
Scranton · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:8349d39b180cc9d7a2506ad47fb3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
11.5 percentScranton · 2026
How calculated
Scranton · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ff680b6a91ac5678- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:72876f33f7b7d99001c27b94b37f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
37.3sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Bison, South Dakota54.1 mi90,650 ac97.32. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Manning, North Dakota76.8 mi89,713 ac95.43. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Lemmon, South Dakota49.4 mi86,729 ac94.34. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Whitewood, South Dakota119 mi87,657 ac91.65. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Morristown, South Dakota69.8 mi82,912 ac90.16. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Crook City, South Dakota120.7 mi85,361 ac89.67. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Vale, South Dakota106.5 mi84,217 ac89.48. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in St. Onge, South Dakota114.3 mi84,207 ac899. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Nisland, South Dakota103.9 mi82,972 ac88.510. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Prairie City, South Dakota45.2 mi76,187 ac85.8Source hay
Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Scranton?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Scranton
Alfalfa Hay in Scranton, North DakotaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Scranton, North DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Scranton, North DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Scranton, North DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Scranton, North DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Scranton, North DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 90 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.