Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Sterling, Nebraska

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Sterling.

Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint20,011.1 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context

Production depth60.4 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence87.1 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty50.5 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal32.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Sterling, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 20,011 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 35th percentile among 593 analyzed Nebraska localities and the 73rd percentile nationally. Johnson County reports 3,304 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Odell, Nebraska, 36 miles away with 33,105 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint ranks at the 35th percentile among analyzed Nebraska localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

87.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 16,246 acres · 29th regional percentile · 45th national percentile2009: 14,952 acres · 28th regional percentile · 48th national percentile2010: 7,803 acres · 15th regional percentile · 40th national percentile2011: 29,253 acres · 66th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2012: 22,376 acres · 54th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2013: 21,948 acres · 44th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2014: 35,810 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 66th national percentile2015: 21,681 acres · 49th regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2016: 20,289 acres · 46th regional percentile · 50th national percentile2017: 22,273 acres · 47th regional percentile · 49th national percentile2018: 27,422 acres · 48th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2019: 34,602 acres · 57th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2020: 34,615 acres · 51st regional percentile · 56th national percentile2021: 32,353 acres · 48th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2022: 30,228 acres · 46th regional percentile · 60th national percentile2023: 34,956 acres · 55th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2024: 6,000 acres · 11th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2025: 20,011 acres · 35th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

60.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Johnson County · 2022

How calculated

Johnson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31097:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7eb4756ec08c3b841bcd5d26ce7c
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
9,528 head

Johnson County · 2022

How calculated

Johnson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31097:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,528 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d63b92881fcc8a83ae2484ef8f56
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Johnson County · 2022

How calculated

Johnson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31097:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6ccf9ea16fae0b1b55bdd14fcba6
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
188 head

Johnson County · 2022

How calculated

Johnson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31097:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
188 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:36a9b80a034901452b69317479ca
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Johnson County · 2022

How calculated

Johnson County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31097:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8815c166ef53186eeae6b3038121
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
188 head

Johnson County · 2022

How calculated

Johnson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31097:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
188 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:792a57879b887ae6f3147a3fdb6c
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
6,952 acres

Johnson County · 2022

How calculated

Johnson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31097:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,952 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a3f054944805720aaf4242bc5a5d
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
134 farms

Johnson County · 2022

How calculated

Johnson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31097:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
134 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:840b8b1f12d194d33339ef8cab72
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
448 acres

Johnson County · 2022

How calculated

Johnson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31097:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
448 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ec3f25d0dff6022bb521fed44c49
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
14 farms

Johnson County · 2022

How calculated

Johnson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31097:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:355e12348313e0bf889bb10aa011
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
6.4 percent

Johnson County · 2022

How calculated

Johnson County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31097:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b80559cd89da103542b7ad63ac9e
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
17,508 tons

Johnson County · 2022

How calculated

Johnson County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
31097:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
17,508 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3eb379f84cf3bdf7bbebe5db5e8c
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation32.3 in
How calculated

TECUMSEH 1S, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2f06ca1a237d325775c4b938313b
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature51.3 °F
How calculated

TECUMSEH 1S, NE US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ca2b5b4297bc0ba047f3a3625962
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance12.2 miles
How calculated

TECUMSEH 1S, NE US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Sterling reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3f4ea6621fc8b55d97f9cf543f38
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Sterling · 2026

How calculated

Sterling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9ba3321e01917f293280fda6e569
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Sterling · 2026

How calculated

Sterling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8a5e221bcf191f5e806a454c746d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Sterling · 2026

How calculated

Sterling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cf0eb1d4a0a4439bb8a047b1b996
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Sterling · 2026

How calculated

Sterling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cbebc644568a4648cd8ce9813bb8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Sterling · 2026

How calculated

Sterling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:10a33736501601bdd1d21de9452c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Sterling · 2026

How calculated

Sterling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8130fbb01811b91e4bd93d4cc781
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
2 weeks

Sterling · 2026

How calculated

Sterling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7c9402964b7f5dceb4db2a798fc6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Sterling · 2026

How calculated

Sterling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:565338f358e67bd29719cb081ee8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0.4 0-100

Sterling · 2026

How calculated

Sterling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:87c91b5dfbd423b7a6192edf5e10
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
9.4 0-100

Sterling · 2026

How calculated

Sterling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:01ec6f4e45f51b7ac90da1ac2ea6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
3.8 percent

Sterling · 2026

How calculated

Sterling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:06082961e41f802e7b85e6bc74f8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Sterling · 2026

How calculated

Sterling · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:f86afca1590f2f04
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:167ffa6e58389c7ee82763370034
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

50.5sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Sterling?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 90 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.