Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Riceville, Montana

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Riceville.

Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint64,282.8 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context

Production depth91.6 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence88.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty38.7 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal21.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Riceville, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 64,283 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 91st percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities and the 97th percentile nationally. Cascade County reports 18,947 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as King Ranch Colony, Montana, 62 miles away with 125,456 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

Riceville ranks among the strongest persistent mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprints in Montana.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2008-30m
  • usda-cdl-2008-30m
  • usda-cdl-2009-30m
  • usda-cdl-2009-30m
  • usda-cdl-2010-30m
  • usda-cdl-2010-30m
  • usda-cdl-2011-30m
  • usda-cdl-2011-30m
  • usda-cdl-2012-30m
  • usda-cdl-2012-30m
  • usda-cdl-2013-30m
  • usda-cdl-2013-30m
  • usda-cdl-2014-30m
  • usda-cdl-2014-30m
  • usda-cdl-2015-30m
  • usda-cdl-2015-30m
  • usda-cdl-2016-30m
  • usda-cdl-2016-30m
  • usda-cdl-2017-30m
  • usda-cdl-2017-30m
  • usda-cdl-2018-30m
  • usda-cdl-2018-30m
  • usda-cdl-2019-30m
  • usda-cdl-2019-30m
  • usda-cdl-2020-30m
  • usda-cdl-2020-30m
  • usda-cdl-2021-30m
  • usda-cdl-2021-30m
  • usda-cdl-2022-30m
  • usda-cdl-2022-30m
  • usda-cdl-2023-30m
  • usda-cdl-2023-30m
  • usda-cdl-2024-30m
  • usda-cdl-2024-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

88.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 93,659 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 91st national percentile2009: 85,221 acres · 86th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2010: 57,877 acres · 76th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2011: 62,230 acres · 78th regional percentile · 79th national percentile2012: 55,419 acres · 76th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2013: 59,653 acres · 79th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile2014: 143,479 acres · 80th regional percentile · 97th national percentile2015: 100,707 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2016: 96,591 acres · 78th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2017: 98,187 acres · 76th regional percentile · 91st national percentile2018: 129,272 acres · 77th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2019: 118,814 acres · 79th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2020: 128,066 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 96th national percentile2021: 128,805 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 98th national percentile2022: 129,875 acres · 80th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2023: 127,374 acres · 81st regional percentile · 98th national percentile2024: 42,067 acres · 87th regional percentile · 95th national percentile2025: 64,283 acres · 91st regional percentile · 97th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

91.6production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
43,136 head

Cascade County · 2022

How calculated

Cascade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30013:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
43,136 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1e76df76a686e3d7e5187efa37c6
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
69,727 head

Cascade County · 2022

How calculated

Cascade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30013:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
69,727 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b650ba9f037d36af405efbf9c139
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
1,239 head

Cascade County · 2022

How calculated

Cascade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30013:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,239 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9066cd4e371c5b317415d97372c8
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,952 head

Cascade County · 2022

How calculated

Cascade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30013:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,952 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6c36c4f6d526294aae3b2d52a6ff
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.1 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Cascade County · 2022

How calculated

Cascade County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30013:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:131d8c5fe0d9844f40116ae86f4a
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
711 head

Cascade County · 2022

How calculated

Cascade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30013:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
711 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:41256ec7ee63bc97906f5674dfa9
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
87,620 acres

Cascade County · 2022

How calculated

Cascade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30013:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
87,620 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f1af464f3c86da678863c00a5eef
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
439 farms

Cascade County · 2022

How calculated

Cascade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30013:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
439 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9bf32e8607d3674c1da23746a704
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
18,395 acres

Cascade County · 2022

How calculated

Cascade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30013:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
18,395 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:30a186afbe5babe8265439cd96a5
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
188 farms

Cascade County · 2022

How calculated

Cascade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30013:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
188 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:32abc9f9dda6937bd7a4f849251c
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
21 percent

Cascade County · 2022

How calculated

Cascade County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30013:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:755637312308644756a8a1863a3b
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
116,798 tons

Cascade County · 2022

How calculated

Cascade County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
30013:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
116,798 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3d7a4bda18f2fb1248ddc08819b4
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation21.6 in
How calculated

RAYNESFORD 2 NNW, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:747fd4a8b5e26bd7ec38e9aed06b
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature44.9 °F
How calculated

RAYNESFORD 2 NNW, MT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9ce4e0d9a6c9eaa5fbcecd46d952
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance10 miles
How calculated

RAYNESFORD 2 NNW, MT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Riceville reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c831d504f71a4e9002ed07f9dcec
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
3.4 percent

Riceville · 2026

How calculated

Riceville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6263f7670c6d2af7e0b5f463a31d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Riceville · 2026

How calculated

Riceville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5ac5f0865d0075e517f3b483a297
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Riceville · 2026

How calculated

Riceville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:16877a158f5f25dde980a0ed5d80
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Riceville · 2026

How calculated

Riceville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:766d78a79aca93ced3951bea5640
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
8.1 0-100

Riceville · 2026

How calculated

Riceville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0a16b22505b204844cad9f6920a2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Riceville · 2026

How calculated

Riceville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c686cd692e1f1531611f39c9dd40
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
43 weeks

Riceville · 2026

How calculated

Riceville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2a407fd31098c7a2fb3a016da01d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Riceville · 2026

How calculated

Riceville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eca98aad1552dd0775b2c2dcc753
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
74.9 0-100

Riceville · 2026

How calculated

Riceville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f01a8d45a2b567e6dbb8e913ce89
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
3.1 0-100

Riceville · 2026

How calculated

Riceville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5be1f616387f4857c3a085ecc26b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
79.6 percent

Riceville · 2026

How calculated

Riceville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fe04d89cf6bd1cf069141d61d8fa
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
52.2 percent

Riceville · 2026

How calculated

Riceville · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:724f3b5679ea19cf3288cfdd55ae
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

38.7sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Riceville?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 91 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.