Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Philipsburg, Montana
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Philipsburg.
Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Philipsburg, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 29,876 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 51st percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities and the 84th percentile nationally. Granite County reports 8,924 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Three Forks, Montana, 89 miles away with 75,298 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED
The 25-mile mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint ranks at the 51st percentile among analyzed Montana localities.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
2,549 ac
10 mi
4,300 ac
25 mi
29,876 ac
50 mi
79,849 ac
100 mi
338,717 ac
150 mi
744,717 ac
250 mi
2,364,450 ac
Within 25 miles29,876mapped acres · 2.377% of radius · 2025
51th percentile among 497 analyzed Montana localities · 84th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Philipsburg · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
55866- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 55866 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:8950c25dfad66551cf2389ab59f0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
91.3 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
70.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) headGranite County · 2022
How calculated
Granite County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30039:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- (D) head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:30c2ee2cc6380f28c853be12d0bc- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
16,535 headGranite County · 2022
How calculated
Granite County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30039:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 16,535 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:5d92acac1ad5519e5040ed6c7d8a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) headGranite County · 2022
How calculated
Granite County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30039:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- (D) head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:c070d5b3105fa12be9b38893cc91- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
697 headGranite County · 2022
How calculated
Granite County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30039:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 697 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:bb65c1ac8485078b2230140d4541- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1 reported_hay_acres/reported_headGranite County · 2022
How calculated
Granite County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30039:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:dba1c78b6e1065ceafc5af6b97c1- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) headGranite County · 2022
How calculated
Granite County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30039:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- (D) head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:af291a0482e1c4e609476f73c7ce- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
17,272 acresGranite County · 2022
How calculated
Granite County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30039:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 17,272 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:059233b9a0fc344f334df7f0b401- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
64 farmsGranite County · 2022
How calculated
Granite County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30039:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 64 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:0a396c23824a2710edc6becd698f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acresGranite County · 2022
How calculated
Granite County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30039:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- (D) acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:206030a7d4ff2f945f81ecb8090b- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
62 farmsGranite County · 2022
How calculated
Granite County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30039:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 62 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:56ac88eb51aeefe9649c4c7edf1a- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
40,685 tonsGranite County · 2022
How calculated
Granite County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30039:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 40,685 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:b4c06a15936eb420ac5abc4ee306- Official record
- Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.4 tons/acreGranite County · 2022
How calculated
Granite County · county
Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
30039:hay:reported-yield:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- tons/acre
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:22f730042959620f2cec508088d0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation16.5 in
How calculated
PHILLIPSBURG RS, MT US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:706cbae59c2d9bc38926d0bc4f90- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature42 °F
How calculated
PHILLIPSBURG RS, MT US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:95009509ee38bd214fdf17a44f36- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance1.2 miles
How calculated
PHILLIPSBURG RS, MT US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Philipsburg reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:8c49646d8b4c3dfd2154065b1f89- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percentPhilipsburg · 2026
How calculated
Philipsburg · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:7f816dae506163cefa991d507fec- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percentPhilipsburg · 2026
How calculated
Philipsburg · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:93f0abb78771d5a01754a9e8b290- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percentPhilipsburg · 2026
How calculated
Philipsburg · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:3f2a936b7bb853648c1fdf3d2c6e- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 categoryPhilipsburg · 2026
How calculated
Philipsburg · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:5f5924e8f8bba7fa898f1a678b90- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
12.3 0-100Philipsburg · 2026
How calculated
Philipsburg · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:20a5a84cfc51e85afccf91859dd4- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE categoryPhilipsburg · 2026
How calculated
Philipsburg · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:b994311215d244fca04994bb2d81- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
18 weeksPhilipsburg · 2026
How calculated
Philipsburg · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:7146d1cb3c7c3fda1e38729d70fb- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
2.8 0-100Philipsburg · 2026
How calculated
Philipsburg · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:1b1819861fbc9819a0249fa411c5- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
11.3 0-100Philipsburg · 2026
How calculated
Philipsburg · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:33d82c2fe24969aab53c412ab129- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
11.4 0-100Philipsburg · 2026
How calculated
Philipsburg · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:f525f8c43b7b240e07d5f4e29441- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
33.4 percentPhilipsburg · 2026
How calculated
Philipsburg · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:adc6cbb407c18bf244532a3981b7- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
20.7 percentPhilipsburg · 2026
How calculated
Philipsburg · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:894230b1847c7ce5- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:efb079ff69306fad8711d6c9d1e3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
49.9sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Three Forks, Montana88.9 mi75,298 ac95.62. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Twin Bridges, Montana71.5 mi71,989 ac93.13. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Wheatland, Montana86.2 mi72,186 ac92.64. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Sheridan, Montana80.3 mi68,322 ac895. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Willow Creek, Montana86.8 mi68,628 ac896. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Mammoth, Montana76.6 mi66,764 ac87.77. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Brandon, Montana81.9 mi66,879 ac87.58. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Silver Star, Montana65.9 mi63,007 ac84.59. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Pony, Montana82.1 mi61,458 ac82.110. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Glen, Montana65.7 mi59,759 ac81.2Source hay
Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Philipsburg?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Philipsburg
Alfalfa Hay in Philipsburg, MontanaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Philipsburg, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Philipsburg, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Philipsburg, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Philipsburg, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Philipsburg, MontanaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 89 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.