Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Conception, Missouri

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Conception.

Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint36,385.4 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context

Production depth91.3 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence82 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty36.1 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal38.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Conception, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 36,385 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 94th percentile among 1,081 analyzed Missouri localities and the 89th percentile nationally. Nodaway County reports 22,351 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Allendale, Missouri, 27 miles away with 46,358 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

Conception ranks among the strongest persistent mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprints in Missouri.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2008-30m
  • usda-cdl-2008-30m
  • usda-cdl-2009-30m
  • usda-cdl-2009-30m
  • usda-cdl-2010-30m
  • usda-cdl-2010-30m
  • usda-cdl-2011-30m
  • usda-cdl-2011-30m
  • usda-cdl-2012-30m
  • usda-cdl-2012-30m
  • usda-cdl-2013-30m
  • usda-cdl-2013-30m
  • usda-cdl-2014-30m
  • usda-cdl-2014-30m
  • usda-cdl-2015-30m
  • usda-cdl-2015-30m
  • usda-cdl-2016-30m
  • usda-cdl-2016-30m
  • usda-cdl-2017-30m
  • usda-cdl-2017-30m
  • usda-cdl-2018-30m
  • usda-cdl-2018-30m
  • usda-cdl-2019-30m
  • usda-cdl-2019-30m
  • usda-cdl-2020-30m
  • usda-cdl-2020-30m
  • usda-cdl-2021-30m
  • usda-cdl-2021-30m
  • usda-cdl-2022-30m
  • usda-cdl-2022-30m
  • usda-cdl-2023-30m
  • usda-cdl-2023-30m
  • usda-cdl-2024-30m
  • usda-cdl-2024-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

82 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 109,826 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 94th national percentile2009: 66,161 acres · 78th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2010: 147 acres · 69th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2011: 5,660 acres · 78th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2012: 42,769 acres · 70th regional percentile · 72nd national percentile2013: 47,963 acres · 65th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2014: 58,437 acres · 76th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2015: 59,756 acres · 82nd regional percentile · 81st national percentile2016: 77,836 acres · 84th regional percentile · 88th national percentile2017: 68,962 acres · 79th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2018: 80,688 acres · 81st regional percentile · 85th national percentile2019: 82,739 acres · 85th regional percentile · 87th national percentile2020: 93,945 acres · 88th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2021: 59,414 acres · 76th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2022: 76,501 acres · 88th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2023: 78,288 acres · 91st regional percentile · 91st national percentile2024: 4,026 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 58th national percentile2025: 36,385 acres · 94th regional percentile · 89th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

91.3production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Nodaway County · 2022

How calculated

Nodaway County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29147:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cc422c8f93a1cb8af056fe1ae5ba
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
37,833 head

Nodaway County · 2022

How calculated

Nodaway County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29147:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
37,833 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:76c83d0bc5e0c728fcd490cc08e6
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Nodaway County · 2022

How calculated

Nodaway County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29147:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9ff2ad734885a2370e7807388511
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
687 head

Nodaway County · 2022

How calculated

Nodaway County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29147:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
687 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bbd0943621c3ad84db92c99d14a3
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Nodaway County · 2022

How calculated

Nodaway County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29147:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:df20c0451ee89c79c56bd2cfd533
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
1,714 head

Nodaway County · 2022

How calculated

Nodaway County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29147:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,714 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8c04723bf8187577aced7fe23580
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
29,263 acres

Nodaway County · 2022

How calculated

Nodaway County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29147:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
29,263 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bd14688ef933960507c5ee92222b
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
481 farms

Nodaway County · 2022

How calculated

Nodaway County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29147:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
481 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:42c7a9dc4ecc66cfc1988e8a9a6f
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
414 acres

Nodaway County · 2022

How calculated

Nodaway County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29147:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
414 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:65a3dab18abb8f29e22cc997e845
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
9 farms

Nodaway County · 2022

How calculated

Nodaway County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29147:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c866ab78b667ffa9f3a8ce8919da
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
1.4 percent

Nodaway County · 2022

How calculated

Nodaway County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29147:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6ea3f8c68ff1a15068d8b87a0a0e
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
58,627 tons

Nodaway County · 2022

How calculated

Nodaway County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29147:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
58,627 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0718183451c1c4895813a60c7942
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation38.5 in
How calculated

CONCEPTION, MO US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:041a79ea600d059fb70ba4f31590
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature51.7 °F
How calculated

CONCEPTION, MO US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2061fdbc71d1c91feea9ca25fde8
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance0.1 miles
How calculated

CONCEPTION, MO US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Conception reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1124a32be6027d9a53ff6f9e4c5a
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Conception · 2026

How calculated

Conception · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dc9898154dbf25e853e435c4b9f1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Conception · 2026

How calculated

Conception · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3a238da89c614cf2db6546658c4e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Conception · 2026

How calculated

Conception · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b805a9edae5d9c95fb9fe6dc9fb2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Conception · 2026

How calculated

Conception · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c0904cefc3d546d9aff17e6a4bb9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Conception · 2026

How calculated

Conception · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2bcaed973e103cdc06bf484bf155
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Conception · 2026

How calculated

Conception · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c4c602c298ca7cd003c6a10feba8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
3 weeks

Conception · 2026

How calculated

Conception · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7a40360d54d7d121cb6f15a0ec58
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Conception · 2026

How calculated

Conception · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9e49b08423106b205f8a16a5075a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
27.5 0-100

Conception · 2026

How calculated

Conception · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:61e77a51ff4c9209dc1aeec450c5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
16.5 0-100

Conception · 2026

How calculated

Conception · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:742e366fc46b98a8539f39605706
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
8.3 percent

Conception · 2026

How calculated

Conception · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bf3ab3b16fc34417e2d2ad5b92d1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Conception · 2026

How calculated

Conception · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:90f3f887087872487b4dd7c20261
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

36.1sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Conception?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 90 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.