Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Como, Mississippi

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Como.

Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint5,157.3 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context

Production depth79.6 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence74.1 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty43 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal57.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Como, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 5,157 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 77th percentile among 427 analyzed Mississippi localities and the 29th percentile nationally. Panola County reports 11,073 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Randolph, Mississippi, 50 miles away with 11,309 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 83.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint ranks at the 77th percentile among analyzed Mississippi localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

74.1 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 5,358 acres · 45th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2009: 5,777 acres · 56th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2010: 57,053 acres · 59th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2011: 20,808 acres · 44th regional percentile · 58th national percentile2012: 13,799 acres · 60th regional percentile · 49th national percentile2013: 9,032 acres · 61st regional percentile · 35th national percentile2014: 18,849 acres · 63rd regional percentile · 47th national percentile2015: 9,736 acres · 76th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2016: 12,001 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 37th national percentile2017: 23,142 acres · 77th regional percentile · 50th national percentile2018: 22,462 acres · 77th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2019: 20,896 acres · 81st regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2020: 21,871 acres · 77th regional percentile · 42nd national percentile2021: 16,053 acres · 79th regional percentile · 41st national percentile2022: 13,828 acres · 76th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2023: 13,674 acres · 76th regional percentile · 38th national percentile2024: 636 acres · 91st regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2025: 5,157 acres · 77th regional percentile · 29th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

79.6production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
7,155 head

Panola County · 2022

How calculated

Panola County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28107:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7,155 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bc43217cc4f800c465188657b13f
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
11,120 head

Panola County · 2022

How calculated

Panola County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28107:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11,120 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e4503d86fe28536416c6169655ae
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
- head

Panola County · 2022

How calculated

Panola County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28107:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2081015cf6aac7b458e98b370239
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
434 head

Panola County · 2022

How calculated

Panola County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28107:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
434 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c160e04e0d075c54c687267548dc
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Panola County · 2022

How calculated

Panola County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28107:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7ab6fdbf7a4dcf0f8d31e88dbff8
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
343 head

Panola County · 2022

How calculated

Panola County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28107:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
343 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:53417cbb6bed100bdb28a7e60e69
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
11,073 acres

Panola County · 2022

How calculated

Panola County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28107:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11,073 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4f58287df85a6ef2ab907a27157c
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
155 farms

Panola County · 2022

How calculated

Panola County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28107:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
155 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f476b4899c3e0e3877b6ce17efe4
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Panola County · 2022

How calculated

Panola County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28107:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:71a8b295cd4e970fe8172fca1b7a
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
1 farms

Panola County · 2022

How calculated

Panola County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28107:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f007e1c496215da04ab2c78ef2d4
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
18,342 tons

Panola County · 2022

How calculated

Panola County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28107:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
18,342 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b3795f141e716c58dd5820bc550d
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.7 tons/acre

Panola County · 2022

How calculated

Panola County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
28107:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6de1b03014358adf76635ebe52ff
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation57.9 in
How calculated

SENATOBIA, MS US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9a80eae506d28e0d53eaca1ed81a
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature61.9 °F
How calculated

SENATOBIA, MS US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b6c62cd6904e9a5dd4103cc3b414
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance8.2 miles
How calculated

SENATOBIA, MS US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Como reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5a1a136bcf7c790eed2519fedf6b
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
83.6 percent

Como · 2026

How calculated

Como · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:061309bc30538874b63376dcdf85
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Como · 2026

How calculated

Como · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:808a632db932d2baa4d78391330d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Como · 2026

How calculated

Como · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f41a498a06ff5e326d7c9405549f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 category

Como · 2026

How calculated

Como · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f226462c16fe181a95b41e1522dc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
36.7 0-100

Como · 2026

How calculated

Como · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c31236ad47fee40810bd8e82c9bf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Como · 2026

How calculated

Como · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:56beebe3273fa55355ccf0724ba2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
40 weeks

Como · 2026

How calculated

Como · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0b6ea4ee09872e72f9a0ab6d51d2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
28.3 0-100

Como · 2026

How calculated

Como · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2a205c7186016f069ab948ddaba0
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
57.9 0-100

Como · 2026

How calculated

Como · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:07dc66e30b24a196d3df9cb4873b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
24.4 0-100

Como · 2026

How calculated

Como · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9ce5818ac1094461c254541af122
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
82.7 percent

Como · 2026

How calculated

Como · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c1b79ec14433a252439d2febf7f7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
47.2 percent

Como · 2026

How calculated

Como · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:3b3b3ad69491c93a
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:82819245b0b267b651178fefb795
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

43sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Como?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 89 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.