HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Marble, Minnesota

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Marble.

Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint5,694.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context

Production depth39 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence72.6 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty63.4 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal29.4 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes Sell Grass / Alfalfa Mix Near Marble
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Marble, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 5,695 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 4th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities and the 31st percentile nationally. Itasca County reports 15,564 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Turtle River, Minnesota, 71 miles away with 30,084 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint ranks at the 4th percentile among analyzed Minnesota localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles5,695mapped acres · 0.453% of radius · 2025

4th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities · 31th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Marble · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
7941
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
7941 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ea0db683ba9ba400f600f5784568
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

72.6 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 2,557 acres · 4th regional percentile · 16th national percentile2009: 1,561 acres · 4th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2010: 1,295 acres · 4th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2011: 11,783 acres · 13th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2012: 15,646 acres · 22nd regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2013: 7,048 acres · 9th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2014: 15,106 acres · 20th regional percentile · 42nd national percentile2015: 4,682 acres · 5th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2016: 3,803 acres · 4th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2017: 5,831 acres · 4th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2018: 5,606 acres · 5th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2019: 3,731 acres · 4th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2020: 3,195 acres · 4th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2021: 2,445 acres · 4th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2022: 3,890 acres · 4th regional percentile · 17th national percentile2023: 2,468 acres · 4th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2024: 1,606 acres · 6th regional percentile · 45th national percentile2025: 5,695 acres · 4th regional percentile · 31st national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

39production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
2,731 head

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,731 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3fcaab543311c46b60af61492b10
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
5,421 head

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,421 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d09fb785e64c7ac558e12107e65c
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
5 head

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7c1fe50db203bb5f2de60b95ac3e
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
426 head

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
426 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2020c89a3be183a79eedb4146edd
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
3.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:518f0c6bfd6672b9b16e039d9cbb
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
109 head

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
109 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:37c575aaecbd6c6435f91d00532c
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
24,547 acres

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
24,547 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ad65dd71ab46599aa95be02d720c
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
242 farms

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
242 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cae7d2d4beee9063d4634ad54cf1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
180 acres

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
180 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3d29b298a30a69eb709ed1b29dc2
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farms

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d2ef99aa3d52e5d8c895a92c84bd
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.7 percent

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ac06f17f491cd30e069c286d2259
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
36,202 tons

Itasca County · 2022

How calculated

Itasca County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
27061:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
36,202 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0687983cbebd9337a094cb4dbd5f
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation29.4 in
How calculated

GRAND RPDS FOREST LAB, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b2b2315f8c3d7c0c7e56a1460714
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature40.1 °F
How calculated

GRAND RPDS FOREST LAB, MN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:34cd631c16af9c5e790e960751fa
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance11.5 miles
How calculated

GRAND RPDS FOREST LAB, MN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Marble reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fc3fd0ff26b2c959baca71bc79d4
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Marble · 2026

How calculated

Marble · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c62a1965e6f5db39df752767ccfa
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Marble · 2026

How calculated

Marble · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:99e136f830918fbe3120b408c837
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Marble · 2026

How calculated

Marble · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6a14e971109d69462892760d2219
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Marble · 2026

How calculated

Marble · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6dee9a15ce9c5c908957d360a3b6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
60 0-100

Marble · 2026

How calculated

Marble · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ac80af3371741e212785485b1894
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Marble · 2026

How calculated

Marble · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:16c5ab52ab6c387e45cac9f9aa75
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
29 weeks

Marble · 2026

How calculated

Marble · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:678c94e6a9dbaea59a703720ff23
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
50.7 0-100

Marble · 2026

How calculated

Marble · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:af7dae564b5d7d6fa4493555530f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Marble · 2026

How calculated

Marble · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:92f03f2eaa749dd5415d36260345
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Marble · 2026

How calculated

Marble · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:302ef722835d7e55de5c70c432d4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
82 percent

Marble · 2026

How calculated

Marble · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c8c3e151e800452778fb10e71f7e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
21.7 percent

Marble · 2026

How calculated

Marble · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:481dac44ce2e738b70dd8b7a8d8a
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

63.4sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Turtle River, Minnesota70.8 mi30,084 ac96.52. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Tenstrike, Minnesota68.9 mi29,255 ac94.53. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Blackduck, Minnesota65.4 mi25,254 ac84.74. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Funkley, Minnesota61.6 mi22,141 ac77.15. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Kelliher, Minnesota68.3 mi20,761 ac73.36. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Pequot Lakes, Minnesota69.7 mi20,344 ac72.27. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Northome, Minnesota59 mi19,454 ac70.58. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Jenkins, Minnesota67.9 mi18,861 ac68.69. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Pine River, Minnesota67 mi18,093 ac66.810. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Backus, Minnesota67.6 mi17,969 ac66.4
Source hay

Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Marble?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay markets in Itasca Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Marble

Alfalfa Hay in Marble, MinnesotaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Marble, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Marble, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Marble, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Marble, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Marble, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 91 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.