Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Echo, Minnesota
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Echo.
Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Echo, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 14,587 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 14th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities and the 61st percentile nationally. Yellow Medicine County reports 1,832 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Lake Benton, Minnesota, 50 miles away with 46,026 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 99.9% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED
The 25-mile mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint ranks at the 14th percentile among analyzed Minnesota localities.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
453 ac
10 mi
2,264 ac
25 mi
14,587 ac
50 mi
92,176 ac
100 mi
528,125 ac
150 mi
1,153,745 ac
250 mi
3,248,245 ac
Within 25 miles14,587mapped acres · 1.161% of radius · 2025
14th percentile among 916 analyzed Minnesota localities · 61th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Echo · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
33952- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 33952 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:9301161f4e804eae4f773e142bd7- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
90.2 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
49.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
3,842 headYellow Medicine County · 2022
How calculated
Yellow Medicine County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
27173:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 3,842 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d38240d47da6e1f0fa70a146576c- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
19,424 headYellow Medicine County · 2022
How calculated
Yellow Medicine County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
27173:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 19,424 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:65934458cf7a268a057d58089edc- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
2,667 headYellow Medicine County · 2022
How calculated
Yellow Medicine County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
27173:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 2,667 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:aa6324eee30dc00c3d7f96656be3- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
289 headYellow Medicine County · 2022
How calculated
Yellow Medicine County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
27173:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 289 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:52a3a08db00652f339f560650468- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_headYellow Medicine County · 2022
How calculated
Yellow Medicine County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
27173:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:ed2978ed91c7c9ceef6e33b14d45- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
136 headYellow Medicine County · 2022
How calculated
Yellow Medicine County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
27173:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 136 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:09e81e0a994c6062b46348be842f- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
6,618 acresYellow Medicine County · 2022
How calculated
Yellow Medicine County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
27173:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 6,618 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d898ae4d77a9703e49b431f2e685- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
157 farmsYellow Medicine County · 2022
How calculated
Yellow Medicine County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
27173:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 157 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:9ad964267a6801c8bb47cf25e856- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acresYellow Medicine County · 2022
How calculated
Yellow Medicine County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
27173:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- (D) acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:4d1b3db955facd97c70d0464e76a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
1 farmsYellow Medicine County · 2022
How calculated
Yellow Medicine County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
27173:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 1 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:e68ac046bd693c9c626a94eeea4a- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
20,497 tonsYellow Medicine County · 2022
How calculated
Yellow Medicine County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
27173:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 20,497 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:172ae4202bbc3a000d8862278ae3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.1 tons/acreYellow Medicine County · 2022
How calculated
Yellow Medicine County · county
Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
27173:hay:reported-yield:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- tons/acre
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:9adb5870f322d83007c28c6c26ec- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation28.6 in
How calculated
GRANITE FALLS, MN US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:8bf9b3948820493bdf16459509da- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature44.7 °F
How calculated
GRANITE FALLS, MN US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:aff73df9fa6b41861273240bf636- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance15.1 miles
How calculated
GRANITE FALLS, MN US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Echo reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:cbdc142bf1bb9be1579ff152860c- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
99.9 percentEcho · 2026
How calculated
Echo · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:0edc99fe24db8fc300c716a88ccb- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percentEcho · 2026
How calculated
Echo · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:58c46996dc66e32ed6a10763d07f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percentEcho · 2026
How calculated
Echo · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:82ae6fbddba69f3c0f27a7111dad- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D1 categoryEcho · 2026
How calculated
Echo · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:33e32b0fb8c8e8e509572560090f- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
40 0-100Echo · 2026
How calculated
Echo · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:5cd55ef4d17370caaba58a5c6bd7- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING categoryEcho · 2026
How calculated
Echo · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:4e33056fe641ea7afa133db1dcc7- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
12 weeksEcho · 2026
How calculated
Echo · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:515dc501099803d763b5c803bc72- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
27.9 0-100Echo · 2026
How calculated
Echo · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:b715c8032cfd67597cd970fe0ef6- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
19.7 0-100Echo · 2026
How calculated
Echo · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:5d69947cbd65a50a54f442648a95- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
30.1 0-100Echo · 2026
How calculated
Echo · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:cb1b2df3253fde48c4767b4863df- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
25.8 percentEcho · 2026
How calculated
Echo · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:98d59298dbe02ec3aad492ab5c41- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0.4 percentEcho · 2026
How calculated
Echo · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:221630257fad2640- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:312984fa4757ab17fce9a26e2205- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
56.7sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Lake Benton, Minnesota50.1 mi46,026 ac97.52. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Spicer, Minnesota48.5 mi45,435 ac96.63. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Sunburg, Minnesota51.2 mi45,521 ac96.64. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Hendricks, Minnesota50.4 mi44,783 ac95.55. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Ivanhoe, Minnesota42.6 mi40,093 ac88.26. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Tyler, Minnesota42.7 mi39,996 ac887. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Ruthton, Minnesota45.6 mi39,795 ac87.68. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Florence, Minnesota41 mi39,218 ac86.99. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Arco, Minnesota41.2 mi39,273 ac86.910. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Lake Wilson, Minnesota50.6 mi37,386 ac83.4Source hay
Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Echo?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Echo
Alfalfa Hay in Echo, MinnesotaExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Echo, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Echo, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Echo, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Echo, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Echo, MinnesotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 89 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.