Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Wolf Lake, Michigan
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Wolf Lake.
Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Wolf Lake, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 47,158 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 90th percentile among 745 analyzed Michigan localities and the 94th percentile nationally. Muskegon County reports 1,857 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Crystal, Michigan, 59 miles away with 60,494 mapped acres. The current drought signal is D0 as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED
Wolf Lake ranks among the strongest persistent mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprints in Michigan.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2008-30m
- usda-cdl-2008-30m
- usda-cdl-2009-30m
- usda-cdl-2009-30m
- usda-cdl-2010-30m
- usda-cdl-2010-30m
- usda-cdl-2011-30m
- usda-cdl-2011-30m
- usda-cdl-2012-30m
- usda-cdl-2012-30m
- usda-cdl-2013-30m
- usda-cdl-2013-30m
- usda-cdl-2014-30m
- usda-cdl-2014-30m
- usda-cdl-2015-30m
- usda-cdl-2015-30m
- usda-cdl-2016-30m
- usda-cdl-2016-30m
- usda-cdl-2017-30m
- usda-cdl-2017-30m
- usda-cdl-2018-30m
- usda-cdl-2018-30m
- usda-cdl-2019-30m
- usda-cdl-2019-30m
- usda-cdl-2020-30m
- usda-cdl-2020-30m
- usda-cdl-2021-30m
- usda-cdl-2021-30m
- usda-cdl-2022-30m
- usda-cdl-2022-30m
- usda-cdl-2023-30m
- usda-cdl-2023-30m
- usda-cdl-2024-30m
- usda-cdl-2024-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
1,255 ac
10 mi
5,044 ac
25 mi
47,158 ac
50 mi
114,337 ac
100 mi
414,474 ac
150 mi
1,089,933 ac
250 mi
2,555,120 ac
Within 25 miles47,158mapped acres · 3.753% of radius · 2025
90th percentile among 745 analyzed Michigan localities · 94th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Wolf Lake · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
148992- Evidence
- EXACT
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 148992 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:fad01b7dce69a6ea03292f8be582- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
93.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
92.6production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
1,046 headMuskegon County · 2022
How calculated
Muskegon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26121:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 1,046 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d126069fda835b3e9a927280b86d- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
9,372 headMuskegon County · 2022
How calculated
Muskegon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26121:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 9,372 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:b311a594f7ccc0c8af369a74c6fc- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
5,223 headMuskegon County · 2022
How calculated
Muskegon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26121:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 5,223 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:7e7c9023fafb79c36c692e65108b- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
596 headMuskegon County · 2022
How calculated
Muskegon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26121:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 596 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:87fe49380f743c9ef3aaa21555d7- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.7 reported_hay_acres/reported_headMuskegon County · 2022
How calculated
Muskegon County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26121:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:e435f954731a8efcda210526b790- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
36 headMuskegon County · 2022
How calculated
Muskegon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26121:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 36 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:ad1c67e5538eb5d91af5c17c4214- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
6,727 acresMuskegon County · 2022
How calculated
Muskegon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26121:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 6,727 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:e3899e2aa0cf00057453a7aca3be- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
134 farmsMuskegon County · 2022
How calculated
Muskegon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26121:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 134 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:b5efff1eab6a9674cdfcc005032e- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
202 acresMuskegon County · 2022
How calculated
Muskegon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26121:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 202 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:127133e3e433400221f408eb4278- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
4 farmsMuskegon County · 2022
How calculated
Muskegon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26121:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 4 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:3bee55e439caad45a64324d5b74d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
3 percentMuskegon County · 2022
How calculated
Muskegon County · county
Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26121:hay:irrigated-share:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:3e606d2747e0ecf6e238dd6b5ab3- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
12,893 tonsMuskegon County · 2022
How calculated
Muskegon County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
26121:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 12,893 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:a64f10a9124ebd71a5445e5c22b2- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation35.1 in
How calculated
MUSKEGON CO AP, MI US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:b2ff6dc5e91ce6dc7ec560e7a456- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature49.4 °F
How calculated
MUSKEGON CO AP, MI US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:c839cea6d36252b5bb7538b182f3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance8.1 miles
How calculated
MUSKEGON CO AP, MI US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Wolf Lake reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:7e1e0e015c0135bb20e4cc334e3d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percentWolf Lake · 2026
How calculated
Wolf Lake · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:cc796a7f0cc63457d74f31cd2eed- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percentWolf Lake · 2026
How calculated
Wolf Lake · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:dca9baddf1ec0c352a163d86f695- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percentWolf Lake · 2026
How calculated
Wolf Lake · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:88eb4dea07e90af723bb7fa9f0e0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D0 categoryWolf Lake · 2026
How calculated
Wolf Lake · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:b1589e65ec5f93f417d5092d63e0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
20 0-100Wolf Lake · 2026
How calculated
Wolf Lake · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:e342d57a92f3bd1a2a86147ebe48- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE categoryWolf Lake · 2026
How calculated
Wolf Lake · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:5cdedbe9f935d5e9a5dd86d42e65- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
17 weeksWolf Lake · 2026
How calculated
Wolf Lake · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:9abab78bb68b66e14a832884f278- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100Wolf Lake · 2026
How calculated
Wolf Lake · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:69bddffbac1528722e7f507d0900- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100Wolf Lake · 2026
How calculated
Wolf Lake · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:9cefab6b3546c1a8fb2de930638c- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
16.3 0-100Wolf Lake · 2026
How calculated
Wolf Lake · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:bc0b7c1e8bb0247cef7f7d855ca5- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
32.1 percentWolf Lake · 2026
How calculated
Wolf Lake · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:788a3f1860cc8e1308fb33503f31- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
4.8 percentWolf Lake · 2026
How calculated
Wolf Lake · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:1b7e7f92ef0b57b3ff2f6ed994ca- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
35sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Crystal, Michigan59.4 mi60,494 ac972. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Sheridan, Michigan52 mi57,931 ac94.23. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Palo, Michigan57.5 mi55,817 ac91.34. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Stanton, Michigan52.1 mi54,616 ac90.15. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Edmore, Michigan55.2 mi54,468 ac89.86. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in McBride, Michigan54.2 mi54,366 ac89.77. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Newaygo, Michigan19.7 mi51,709 ac88.18. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Grant, Michigan16.4 mi51,476 ac889. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Northview, Michigan29.3 mi52,025 ac8810. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Mecosta, Michigan51.3 mi52,425 ac87.4Source hay
Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Wolf Lake?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Wolf Lake
Alfalfa Hay in Wolf Lake, MichiganExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Wolf Lake, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Wolf Lake, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Wolf Lake, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Wolf Lake, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Wolf Lake, MichiganContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 90 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.