HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Manter, Kansas

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Manter.

Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint3,680 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context

Production depth42.6 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence88.4 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty60.2 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal17.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes Sell Grass / Alfalfa Mix Near Manter
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Manter, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 3,680 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 2nd percentile among 740 analyzed Kansas localities and the 23rd percentile nationally. Stanton County reports 4,134 acres of reported hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Holcomb, Kansas, 58 miles away with 70,581 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 92.1% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint ranks at the 2nd percentile among analyzed Kansas localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles3,680mapped acres · 0.293% of radius · 2025

2th percentile among 740 analyzed Kansas localities · 23th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Manter · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
12562
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
12562 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6b0dc550c153cefdf7118635356e
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

88.4 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 5,559 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 25th national percentile2009: 6,093 acres · 4th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2010: 4,528 acres · 41st regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2011: 2,512 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 31st national percentile2012: 8,940 acres · 44th regional percentile · 42nd national percentile2013: 6,600 acres · 4th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2014: 8,234 acres · 10th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2015: 5,624 acres · 6th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2016: 5,594 acres · 5th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2017: 5,910 acres · 6th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2018: 7,869 acres · 7th regional percentile · 24th national percentile2019: 7,112 acres · 6th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2020: 9,864 acres · 9th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2021: 8,573 acres · 6th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2022: 5,972 acres · 4th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2023: 4,224 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 18th national percentile2024: 2,839 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2025: 3,680 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 23rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

42.6production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Stanton County · 2022

How calculated

Stanton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20187:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:519226521b270b5bb6bfae02af56
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
20,786 head

Stanton County · 2022

How calculated

Stanton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20187:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
20,786 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:dbf3029cda67dcb1c9c4ce3c5e26
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Stanton County · 2022

How calculated

Stanton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20187:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:294da35fc601d11796337575adeb
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
(D) head

Stanton County · 2022

How calculated

Stanton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20187:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a52d8f0198dc82a5867115cf411c
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Stanton County · 2022

How calculated

Stanton County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20187:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1d98bf6241253506b2dad492ca1c
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
4,134 acres

Stanton County · 2022

How calculated

Stanton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20187:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,134 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:186b18e348eaa5f8fe5b4d95e1a9
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
17 farms

Stanton County · 2022

How calculated

Stanton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20187:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
17 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3640f7c10630c43d6374149eb439
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
3,254 acres

Stanton County · 2022

How calculated

Stanton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20187:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,254 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2d103acfc267dd6f8ea217118c41
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
14 farms

Stanton County · 2022

How calculated

Stanton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20187:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
14 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2e5555d94a78eb010187f8119e9c
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
78.7 percent

Stanton County · 2022

How calculated

Stanton County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20187:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:42fa5065a5991b9416e020504430
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
13,948 tons

Stanton County · 2022

How calculated

Stanton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20187:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
13,948 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:77d58f4e5279a3314498836b4c95
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.4 tons/acre

Stanton County · 2022

How calculated

Stanton County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
20187:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1f991dca339f3a7cb6c68524b700
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation17.5 in
How calculated

JOHNSON, KS US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a8f0cb6b838df38b5e5f04d655e4
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature55.8 °F
How calculated

JOHNSON, KS US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:46dc3db7fcf60994f039c4b3ae40
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7.8 miles
How calculated

JOHNSON, KS US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Manter reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1367672b7255fb01071be756eaa6
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Manter · 2026

How calculated

Manter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d2e2ad06a662ea2f4560211241a3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
92.1 percent

Manter · 2026

How calculated

Manter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e9cdc46c1a4dc4b696c1b1e62cde
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Manter · 2026

How calculated

Manter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b4f4f6588869650005730156a51a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Manter · 2026

How calculated

Manter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:509f928f1ced3b666bb79fbbf98d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
58.4 0-100

Manter · 2026

How calculated

Manter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:07e2080152dcc833f1c5ec1e0b55
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Manter · 2026

How calculated

Manter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:32987e3a5e178acb023ebfdeb695
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
24 weeks

Manter · 2026

How calculated

Manter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0ed73cc0ffb42f7988d985502fcf
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Manter · 2026

How calculated

Manter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:26f90e9da5e247d9700fd623791d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Manter · 2026

How calculated

Manter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a746c6ab085f33c0893596fae4b6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
43.6 0-100

Manter · 2026

How calculated

Manter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ed64fd0bb2f68504134408329581
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
45.7 percent

Manter · 2026

How calculated

Manter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a77bba205fb9e23bfa2e3718bb7b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
32.4 percent

Manter · 2026

How calculated

Manter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:8f5d2e3602d5a192
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f36cd7b69201e363250bb5f7c2a5
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

60.2sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Holcomb, Kansas58.1 mi70,581 ac96.82. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Garden City, Kansas64.4 mi70,852 ac96.83. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Deerfield, Kansas51.7 mi68,205 ac94.64. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Lakin, Kansas44.6 mi65,618 ac92.25. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Lamar, Colorado55.2 mi62,151 ac886. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Granada, Colorado43.9 mi59,745 ac867. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in McClave, Colorado67.4 mi57,679 ac82.78. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Pierceville, Kansas70.4 mi56,926 ac81.79. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Hasty, Colorado71.5 mi56,737 ac81.510. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Wiley, Colorado63.1 mi55,523 ac80.6
Source hay

Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Manter?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay markets in Stanton Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Manter

Alfalfa Hay in Manter, KansasExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Manter, KansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Manter, KansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Manter, KansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Manter, KansasContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Manter, KansasContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 88 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.