Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Toronto, Iowa

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Toronto.

Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint49,696.4 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context

Production depth90.7 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence83.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty35.4 / 100LOW

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal39.6 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Toronto, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 49,696 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 92nd percentile among 1,026 analyzed Iowa localities and the 95th percentile nationally. Clinton County reports 2,139 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Zwingle, Iowa, 29 miles away with 71,470 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

Toronto ranks among the strongest persistent mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprints in Iowa.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2008-30m
  • usda-cdl-2008-30m
  • usda-cdl-2009-30m
  • usda-cdl-2009-30m
  • usda-cdl-2010-30m
  • usda-cdl-2010-30m
  • usda-cdl-2011-30m
  • usda-cdl-2011-30m
  • usda-cdl-2012-30m
  • usda-cdl-2012-30m
  • usda-cdl-2013-30m
  • usda-cdl-2013-30m
  • usda-cdl-2014-30m
  • usda-cdl-2014-30m
  • usda-cdl-2015-30m
  • usda-cdl-2015-30m
  • usda-cdl-2016-30m
  • usda-cdl-2016-30m
  • usda-cdl-2017-30m
  • usda-cdl-2017-30m
  • usda-cdl-2018-30m
  • usda-cdl-2018-30m
  • usda-cdl-2019-30m
  • usda-cdl-2019-30m
  • usda-cdl-2020-30m
  • usda-cdl-2020-30m
  • usda-cdl-2021-30m
  • usda-cdl-2021-30m
  • usda-cdl-2022-30m
  • usda-cdl-2022-30m
  • usda-cdl-2023-30m
  • usda-cdl-2023-30m
  • usda-cdl-2024-30m
  • usda-cdl-2024-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

83.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 11,054 acres · 54th regional percentile · 36th national percentile2009: 7,917 acres · 67th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2010: 10,157 acres · 48th regional percentile · 44th national percentile2011: 44,578 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 72nd national percentile2012: 29,315 acres · 67th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2013: 30,680 acres · 63rd regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2014: 32,520 acres · 60th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2015: 20,870 acres · 65th regional percentile · 51st national percentile2016: 22,327 acres · 66th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2017: 22,250 acres · 67th regional percentile · 49th national percentile2018: 21,631 acres · 60th regional percentile · 45th national percentile2019: 18,141 acres · 55th regional percentile · 39th national percentile2020: 19,861 acres · 53rd regional percentile · 40th national percentile2021: 19,218 acres · 64th regional percentile · 46th national percentile2022: 16,950 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2023: 16,885 acres · 64th regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2024: 16,113 acres · 79th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2025: 49,696 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 95th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

90.7production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
10,646 head

Clinton County · 2022

How calculated

Clinton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19045:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10,646 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:31a8137ce9383cef198fb34539f0
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
50,056 head

Clinton County · 2022

How calculated

Clinton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19045:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
50,056 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ca2d12f85cd115aac04122bf76d4
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
3,355 head

Clinton County · 2022

How calculated

Clinton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19045:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,355 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:70d3af1b7e8c6327bd8b13f04928
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
477 head

Clinton County · 2022

How calculated

Clinton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19045:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
477 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d4a529ec0d3d159ca8f94ca73a9a
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Clinton County · 2022

How calculated

Clinton County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19045:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4c9279b87b2ce23a7a375aa073cb
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
1,092 head

Clinton County · 2022

How calculated

Clinton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19045:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,092 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c81888cff26c2d7c7ce282fd7320
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
11,426 acres

Clinton County · 2022

How calculated

Clinton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19045:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11,426 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1f76cc2e6528e917c7c20e3c7c9a
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
371 farms

Clinton County · 2022

How calculated

Clinton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19045:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
371 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4ab969dd67f3e5f89b8632ec0c8b
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Clinton County · 2022

How calculated

Clinton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19045:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8ef3aca67dfeb1ad0bf1bc2b0b6e
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
3 farms

Clinton County · 2022

How calculated

Clinton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19045:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:33679a24ce380f9cd27caacf9e68
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
42,410 tons

Clinton County · 2022

How calculated

Clinton County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19045:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
42,410 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4f31ab74ae62d67a48626443c26e
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3.7 tons/acre

Clinton County · 2022

How calculated

Clinton County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
19045:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0ef5b32c09fb7250161b675d686d
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation39.6 in
How calculated

LOWDEN, IA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0398e95a4320599172412a7a2fe2
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature49 °F
How calculated

LOWDEN, IA US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f6922ed25c6ca0176bb22682e5cd
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance4.2 miles
How calculated

LOWDEN, IA US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Toronto reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2fdee6bac2b2f3bfeff8a1c566e4
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Toronto · 2026

How calculated

Toronto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0f07779305965a44593b23620aa1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Toronto · 2026

How calculated

Toronto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8c614a707aa29939ba507100d44d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Toronto · 2026

How calculated

Toronto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4e66a25203669fb6f4ef3c7219a7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Toronto · 2026

How calculated

Toronto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bb5ca3c67561bddf5942c48d2e0a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Toronto · 2026

How calculated

Toronto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c3d80409da1d20b8160d99a12f42
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Toronto · 2026

How calculated

Toronto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:283e6fc667092c44d08ecc55e790
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
10 weeks

Toronto · 2026

How calculated

Toronto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5e8684f39c2fff27300f9a297462
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
14.8 0-100

Toronto · 2026

How calculated

Toronto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ba0dd5f006dc0a50ca0c50c3e5a2
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Toronto · 2026

How calculated

Toronto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7ead2e9db4101b33f2f4b106eed9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Toronto · 2026

How calculated

Toronto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:240e09f8d9dd87196007845b6aba
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
29.4 percent

Toronto · 2026

How calculated

Toronto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2b36d70a9f91b9bc4542b86eac37
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Toronto · 2026

How calculated

Toronto · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:7c08e810b6559feb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:99175920b456b0c3ec877b31bbb6
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

35.4sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Toronto?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 89 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.