HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Hope, Idaho

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Hope.

Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint6,028.7 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context

Production depth42.2 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence72.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty61.5 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal34 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes Sell Grass / Alfalfa Mix Near Hope
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Hope, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 6,029 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 10th percentile among 236 analyzed Idaho localities and the 33rd percentile nationally. Bonner County reports 8,695 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Latah, Washington, 78 miles away with 50,347 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint ranks at the 10th percentile among analyzed Idaho localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles6,029mapped acres · 0.48% of radius · 2025

10th percentile among 236 analyzed Idaho localities · 33th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Hope · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
3808
Evidence
EXACT
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3808 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6d9d5d35b9c86d2202658862c475
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

72.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 4,625 acres · 8th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2009: 3,648 acres · 7th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2010: 1,027 acres · 6th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2011: 943 acres · 6th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2012: 1,150 acres · 5th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2013: 781 acres · 6th regional percentile · 13th national percentile2014: 1,524 acres · 5th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2015: 1,409 acres · 6th regional percentile · 12th national percentile2016: 2,697 acres · 7th regional percentile · 15th national percentile2017: 1,512 acres · 5th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2018: 2,238 acres · 6th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2019: 2,398 acres · 6th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2020: 2,541 acres · 6th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2021: 5,456 acres · 8th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2022: 9,053 acres · 10th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2023: 9,290 acres · 10th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2024: 2,471 acres · 10th regional percentile · 50th national percentile2025: 6,029 acres · 10th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

42.2production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
1,975 head

Bonner County · 2022

How calculated

Bonner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16017:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,975 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:da063dc93cef21ea4a6e9cdaac9d
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
3,797 head

Bonner County · 2022

How calculated

Bonner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16017:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,797 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:961b7a6af1520e1558adcf676395
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
69 head

Bonner County · 2022

How calculated

Bonner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16017:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
69 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:80cae503d3bd6489caa2002de002
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,101 head

Bonner County · 2022

How calculated

Bonner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16017:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,101 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9e659b8f19e0ec29db8edba22312
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Bonner County · 2022

How calculated

Bonner County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16017:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:25a6d92ed5bad146732c15c54148
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
274 head

Bonner County · 2022

How calculated

Bonner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16017:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
274 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e3b2d66bc278b11b1d5c8092344a
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
11,897 acres

Bonner County · 2022

How calculated

Bonner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16017:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11,897 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:db8be88382e365e7890ec0673803
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
266 farms

Bonner County · 2022

How calculated

Bonner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16017:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
266 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7d18daf2723a280e69ff1c6771ee
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
478 acres

Bonner County · 2022

How calculated

Bonner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16017:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
478 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9e43a88be78b98cbdd82e3b6ea2f
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
31 farms

Bonner County · 2022

How calculated

Bonner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16017:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
31 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f00c7bbf7b7d69285ea6c9a00e93
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
4 percent

Bonner County · 2022

How calculated

Bonner County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16017:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ddbbe15dad0bb3d4daee4ec6565b
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
19,308 tons

Bonner County · 2022

How calculated

Bonner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16017:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
19,308 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a85eb82514ac296d3caf9919edaf
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation34 in
How calculated

SANDPOINT EXP STN, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f4ce9b1511ecede350c028dea3d3
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature46.1 °F
How calculated

SANDPOINT EXP STN, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:be3cd24abd780bb628a266803832
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance12.3 miles
How calculated

SANDPOINT EXP STN, ID US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Hope reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:99267870275c0a84a3db5966471d
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Hope · 2026

How calculated

Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9e93ad6a7700a55ccabdab7abf39
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Hope · 2026

How calculated

Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a48a8d527833fd116cb78aa4ff2e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Hope · 2026

How calculated

Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ca6393f1c2780034ec66cc1eacba
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Hope · 2026

How calculated

Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:05374667e4261328aa8f30f75e85
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
60 0-100

Hope · 2026

How calculated

Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0d1fe119073a5ceb4bc3d020e03a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Hope · 2026

How calculated

Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:171c23587719a378d6cc84520694
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
23 weeks

Hope · 2026

How calculated

Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5cca6bd36a598f484eeb5a12f90d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
41 0-100

Hope · 2026

How calculated

Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4fcd77e9dba69f9cc891629649f7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
25.5 0-100

Hope · 2026

How calculated

Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e8b23693a4382d82e0fd20e460fe
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Hope · 2026

How calculated

Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c1ee8d6286ba3ef11f3b2f549946
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
80.5 percent

Hope · 2026

How calculated

Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:86995c581a1dcaf52a7bd563df76
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
38.8 percent

Hope · 2026

How calculated

Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3b79a81ada136975381efd4a6a80
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

61.5sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Latah, Washington77.7 mi50,347 ac96.12. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Waverly, Washington76.3 mi47,836 ac92.43. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Fairfield, Washington72.2 mi47,174 ac91.74. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Rockford, Washington67.2 mi46,523 ac90.95. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Spangle, Washington75.5 mi46,733 ac90.86. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Millwood, Washington59.7 mi46,109 ac90.77. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Spokane Valley, Washington59.1 mi44,625 ac88.58. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Worley, Idaho65.3 mi43,149 ac869. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Liberty Lake, Washington54.6 mi42,180 ac85.110. Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Spokane, Washington66 mi41,763 ac83.9
Source hay

Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Hope?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay markets in Bonner Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Hope

Alfalfa Hay in Hope, IdahoExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Hope, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Hope, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Hope, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Hope, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Hope, IdahoContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 91 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.