Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay
in Cambridge, Idaho

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay serving Cambridge.

Request Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint27,981.3 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context

Production depth57.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence91.2 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty52.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal21.4 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context around Cambridge, but it does not measure how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 27,981 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 28th percentile among 236 analyzed Idaho localities and the 83rd percentile nationally. Washington County reports 5,296 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Nyssa, Oregon, 51 miles away with 90,610 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 63.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint ranks at the 28th percentile among analyzed Idaho localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Grass / Alfalfa Mix hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local alfalfa and non-alfalfa hay context footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

91.2 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 70,552 acres · 55th regional percentile · 85th national percentile2009: 55,929 acres · 47th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2010: 35,944 acres · 44th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2011: 40,777 acres · 46th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2012: 44,923 acres · 47th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2013: 40,029 acres · 42nd regional percentile · 71st national percentile2014: 45,497 acres · 41st regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2015: 47,441 acres · 41st regional percentile · 74th national percentile2016: 50,657 acres · 36th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2017: 48,544 acres · 35th regional percentile · 71st national percentile2018: 52,945 acres · 34th regional percentile · 71st national percentile2019: 51,407 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 70th national percentile2020: 57,487 acres · 36th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2021: 55,591 acres · 36th regional percentile · 80th national percentile2022: 55,847 acres · 37th regional percentile · 81st national percentile2023: 55,476 acres · 36th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2024: 16,009 acres · 23rd regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2025: 27,981 acres · 28th regional percentile · 83rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

57.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
15,022 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16087:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
15,022 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f0754e4f435234fb3bba9203f2c7
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
29,081 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16087:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
29,081 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:073e288121533b12616c534e8561
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
10 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16087:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c38e32f90066fd5ddde3b7790318
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
810 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16087:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
810 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c1d8b17c4f4b67558eb152f0b297
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16087:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f14d484bef59800d20df164938c9
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16087:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:11e8c63c7b71e9a110b31da88aea
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
33,732 acres

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16087:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
33,732 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7a7e3ed818a7578148707282766f
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
288 farms

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16087:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
288 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:89e36d0979ebedbad125af90ed05
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
32,784 acres

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16087:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
32,784 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:78b947327f0a69984497c31b6fb1
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
283 farms

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16087:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
283 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4601823194e87b4c66e437629846
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
97.2 percent

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16087:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bee555a9979b32223de6dc56a19b
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
102,994 tons

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
16087:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
102,994 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7e6f15c318397f0d0e911985ba0d
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Grass / Alfalfa Mix benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation21.4 in
How calculated

CAMBRIDGE, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d6e3dd6ca8d9e0449276ca1f56ec
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature48.3 °F
How calculated

CAMBRIDGE, ID US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:080d768dcf551947e3727aac1222
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance0.2 miles
How calculated

CAMBRIDGE, ID US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Cambridge reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0d54bb82175d69d413713d5ec01d
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
95.2 percent

Cambridge · 2026

How calculated

Cambridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:84cd40a6e77d4bd2e942a4801505
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
63.6 percent

Cambridge · 2026

How calculated

Cambridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:193994d8666af1260870d14230a7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Cambridge · 2026

How calculated

Cambridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3406ab73024480e1112b22375803
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Cambridge · 2026

How calculated

Cambridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9286ffe21c5d7ffaa2bd650eee1b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
51.8 0-100

Cambridge · 2026

How calculated

Cambridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b2010737c1a42599dc0b64042478
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Cambridge · 2026

How calculated

Cambridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:57d1f36f3602c3e6b16720d743e3
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
31 weeks

Cambridge · 2026

How calculated

Cambridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7770b26a454de37a66569ecc101d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
41.6 0-100

Cambridge · 2026

How calculated

Cambridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:cce18f2d1cf90f956c47d33a3555
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
31.7 0-100

Cambridge · 2026

How calculated

Cambridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e1937f608a97040e7547bf4de9de
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
47.7 0-100

Cambridge · 2026

How calculated

Cambridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2a328f3ebb44de14f58f90e45b9e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
63.4 percent

Cambridge · 2026

How calculated

Cambridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e9ec57d9785d0d3facdafcac4adb
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
12.5 percent

Cambridge · 2026

How calculated

Cambridge · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:ce0c1103329e0c83
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ba6e1974d0f1cc48b0e1b26e32ee
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

52.6sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Cambridge?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 91 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.