HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Fescue Hay
in Santa Clara, Utah

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Fescue hay serving Santa Clara.

Request Fescue Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint25.1 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth34.5 / 100LOW

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence57.8 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty64.3 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal9.3 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Fescue Hay Quotes Sell Fescue Near Santa Clara
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Santa Clara, but it does not measure how much is specifically Fescue hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 25 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 4th percentile among 3,006 analyzed Utah localities and the 5th percentile nationally. Washington County reports 1,367 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Beaver, Utah, 97 miles away with 5,445 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 100% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyLIMITED
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 4th percentile among analyzed Utah localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Fescue hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles25mapped acres · 0.002% of radius · 2025

4th percentile among 3,006 analyzed Utah localities · 5th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Santa Clara · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
113
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
113 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2c66dd39480e6946202e20737c6b
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

57.8 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 37 acres · 7th regional percentile · 5th national percentile2009: 69 acres · 6th regional percentile · 7th national percentile2010: 92 acres · 4th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2011: 0 acres · 87th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 87th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2013: 90 acres · 8th regional percentile · 11th national percentile2014: 38 acres · 5th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2015: 168 acres · 11th regional percentile · 8th national percentile2016: 71 acres · 5th regional percentile · 6th national percentile2017: 16 acres · 4th regional percentile · 4th national percentile2018: 327 acres · 9th regional percentile · 7th national percentile2019: 234 acres · 7th regional percentile · 6th national percentile2020: 706 acres · 11th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2021: 525 acres · 7th regional percentile · 9th national percentile2022: 604 acres · 10th regional percentile · 10th national percentile2023: 1,082 acres · 11th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2024: 144 acres · 14th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2025: 25 acres · 4th regional percentile · 5th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

34.5production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
6,627 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,627 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a8f60d206a612d1ee8d567da7d4c
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
11,148 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11,148 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b31fca199b2372dff48961bf3375
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
35 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
35 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:280eb615aafbb66c95ddd6a7755f
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,297 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,297 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3c40fcc0389cce8d8b8362a7a528
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.4 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d8b31bc073c32b427dfd35065a1f
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
635 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
635 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:883a97b2f9f01e59df9100f0ac59
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
5,471 acres

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,471 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e5133886c24cf3475a93b8b58606
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
127 farms

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
127 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a10c6d1654a22b8d8d2265bdfe3e
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:71da1aa86de65f0fcadca0649c2f
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
125 farms

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
125 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:66e99785a65b2124f0b0033e0a68
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
16,081 tons

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
16,081 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0743f2f3f399e72d49d165108134
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.9 tons/acre

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
49053:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0c6728277e1db68f4895fec2637e
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Fescue benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation9.3 in
How calculated

ST GEORGE, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:f4ddc55e2bfbbb44205fa4b848c2
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature62.7 °F
How calculated

ST GEORGE, UT US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e47b7e0a81e997f021422a60af5c
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance2.9 miles
How calculated

ST GEORGE, UT US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Santa Clara reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:de758fd4ecf2f7fee3709487faab
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Santa Clara · 2026

How calculated

Santa Clara · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fd5f2ec5d889ae39768fb2864ad9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Santa Clara · 2026

How calculated

Santa Clara · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b0375007ce6c345bbbb7cb6df2e1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Santa Clara · 2026

How calculated

Santa Clara · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:2116068efa28f92a3fa80095a06a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Santa Clara · 2026

How calculated

Santa Clara · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c028f7a6e85060723a397ace520c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
60 0-100

Santa Clara · 2026

How calculated

Santa Clara · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5051294b38b2084231efc244f1e7
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Santa Clara · 2026

How calculated

Santa Clara · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:51a1cea713ae1fe6f4c72409e91d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeks

Santa Clara · 2026

How calculated

Santa Clara · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:eb36230601243fe3b6376bee9e8a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Santa Clara · 2026

How calculated

Santa Clara · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c64b2131b21248b48f25fe449a39
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40 0-100

Santa Clara · 2026

How calculated

Santa Clara · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e8a55350a124faab301b60506b7b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
60 0-100

Santa Clara · 2026

How calculated

Santa Clara · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:08d6e5d91c43aa885ccd7d5cece4
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Santa Clara · 2026

How calculated

Santa Clara · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ddf8fe9973d0554c7b9ea33a8dde
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
66.4 percent

Santa Clara · 2026

How calculated

Santa Clara · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:249674918c89caf6baf0a357cf01
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

64.3sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Fescue Hay in Beaver, Utah96.7 mi5,445 ac95.22. Fescue Hay in Milford, Utah94.1 mi5,119 ac90.83. Fescue Hay in Minersville, Utah85.6 mi5,031 ac904. Fescue Hay in Paragonah, Utah71.2 mi4,896 ac88.95. Fescue Hay in Cedar City, Utah49 mi4,697 ac87.26. Fescue Hay in Enoch, Utah55.2 mi4,614 ac85.87. Fescue Hay in Brian Head, Utah60.1 mi4,631 ac85.88. Fescue Hay in Summit, Utah61.2 mi4,635 ac85.89. Fescue Hay in Cedar Highlands, Utah48.5 mi4,576 ac85.610. Fescue Hay in Parowan, Utah66.3 mi4,615 ac85.2
Source hay

Need Fescue Hay in Santa Clara?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Fescue Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Fescue Hay markets in Washington Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Santa Clara

Alfalfa Hay in Santa Clara, UtahExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Santa Clara, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Santa Clara, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Santa Clara, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Santa Clara, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Santa Clara, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Fescue Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.