Non-alfalfa hay
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Fescue Hay
in Mountain Green, Utah
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Fescue hay serving Mountain Green.
Request Fescue Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Mountain Green, but it does not measure how much is specifically Fescue hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 6,023 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 66th percentile among 3,006 analyzed Utah localities and the 49th percentile nationally. Morgan County reports 4,176 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Peter, Utah, 45 miles away with 20,805 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 88.3% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED
The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 66th percentile among analyzed Utah localities.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Fescue hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local non-alfalfa hay footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
208 ac
10 mi
1,076 ac
25 mi
6,023 ac
50 mi
27,384 ac
100 mi
110,841 ac
150 mi
249,333 ac
250 mi
511,254 ac
Within 25 miles6,023mapped acres · 0.479% of radius · 2025
66th percentile among 3,006 analyzed Utah localities · 49th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Mountain Green · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
27084- Evidence
- FAMILY
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 27084 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:58cbbb138177d17fb4d4b5e7e0b2- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
72.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
73.1production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
4,636 headMorgan County · 2022
How calculated
Morgan County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49029:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 4,636 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:14b976a22dfaf575daf4dc7e561b- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
8,234 headMorgan County · 2022
How calculated
Morgan County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49029:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 8,234 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:5ce66c5e54f46838f4cec68f6c10- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
555 headMorgan County · 2022
How calculated
Morgan County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49029:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 555 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:dbf20c29c9cfa0feee7d0390a127- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
888 headMorgan County · 2022
How calculated
Morgan County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49029:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 888 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:8956094a4cf0dd5e777bc5b8a252- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.3 reported_hay_acres/reported_headMorgan County · 2022
How calculated
Morgan County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49029:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:51949b27f6a084d995b25fd5712b- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
131 headMorgan County · 2022
How calculated
Morgan County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49029:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 131 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:54439b9addc1a935f2f17b254818- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
10,439 acresMorgan County · 2022
How calculated
Morgan County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49029:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 10,439 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:59b8286faf693fa5c6008f0470cc- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
204 farmsMorgan County · 2022
How calculated
Morgan County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49029:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 204 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:0b9914b7064fdb4c30af4836c6c6- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
5,293 acresMorgan County · 2022
How calculated
Morgan County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49029:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 5,293 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:f592e8d3fbf4ca13e2b77b9fcb55- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
175 farmsMorgan County · 2022
How calculated
Morgan County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49029:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 175 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:db103548f39e22c8c39965e27ecb- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
50.7 percentMorgan County · 2022
How calculated
Morgan County · county
Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49029:hay:irrigated-share:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:574d05fcf4e58d53abc3bb76f193- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
28,617 tonsMorgan County · 2022
How calculated
Morgan County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49029:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 28,617 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:4c62b2716101713ec724e314b710- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Fescue benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation26.2 in
How calculated
WEBER BASIN PUMP PLT 3, UT US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:f807c3633269e58ccc5ea4e160ec- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature50.7 °F
How calculated
WEBER BASIN PUMP PLT 3, UT US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:932ac1a19d6603dda29ece65351c- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance7 miles
How calculated
WEBER BASIN PUMP PLT 3, UT US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Mountain Green reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:33387818dd034f054db84b5e56e2- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percentMountain Green · 2026
How calculated
Mountain Green · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:a5317616bd452841498ea33f6568- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
88.3 percentMountain Green · 2026
How calculated
Mountain Green · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:2eed1a23391ead0f1c9e55ad11c9- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percentMountain Green · 2026
How calculated
Mountain Green · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:0ec99f5f2e696bb3c63a49407a69- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 categoryMountain Green · 2026
How calculated
Mountain Green · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:e9cfa9e4365ad432d1a2b518d7eb- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
57.7 0-100Mountain Green · 2026
How calculated
Mountain Green · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:04b10f837c81788d38245d06568e- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE categoryMountain Green · 2026
How calculated
Mountain Green · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:e93c8aceaac6a3c8b068f769a467- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeksMountain Green · 2026
How calculated
Mountain Green · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:805295adea295d2f4668b9b46862- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
59.4 0-100Mountain Green · 2026
How calculated
Mountain Green · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:7c656c092ca7782c3ae3cd3c71dd- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
40.3 0-100Mountain Green · 2026
How calculated
Mountain Green · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:7039805a4ffb0fb555af15d26994- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
57.7 0-100Mountain Green · 2026
How calculated
Mountain Green · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:b50f78e27e4e64759c2f1090aaaf- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percentMountain Green · 2026
How calculated
Mountain Green · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:e4b3cb4c37325064cfd67bc4d0b1- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
44.4 percentMountain Green · 2026
How calculated
Mountain Green · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:ac4721cee4272fe9f2424d5ec70a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
45.8sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Fescue Hay in Peter, Utah44.9 mi20,805 ac97.82. Fescue Hay in Benson, Utah42.4 mi19,417 ac92.93. Fescue Hay in Tremonton, Utah44.5 mi19,414 ac92.84. Fescue Hay in Mendon, Utah40.2 mi18,693 ac90.45. Fescue Hay in Deweyville, Utah40.8 mi18,145 ac88.46. Fescue Hay in Logan, Utah41 mi18,133 ac88.37. Fescue Hay in Elwood, Utah40.6 mi17,727 ac86.98. Fescue Hay in North Logan, Utah43.4 mi17,746 ac86.89. Fescue Hay in River Heights, Utah39.7 mi17,558 ac86.310. Fescue Hay in Honeyville, Utah37.1 mi17,330 ac85.6Source hay
Need Fescue Hay in Mountain Green?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Mountain Green
Alfalfa Hay in Mountain Green, UtahExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Mountain Green, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Mountain Green, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBrome Hay in Mountain Green, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Mountain Green, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Mountain Green, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Fescue Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.