Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Fescue Hay
in Gray, Tennessee

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Fescue hay serving Gray.

Request Fescue Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint7,945.9 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth71.2 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence73.8 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty45.2 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal44 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Gray, but it does not measure how much is specifically Fescue hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 7,946 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 62nd percentile among 4,536 analyzed Tennessee localities and the 62nd percentile nationally. Washington County reports 32,896 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Mooresburg, Tennessee, 43 miles away with 18,495 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 62nd percentile among analyzed Tennessee localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Fescue hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

73.8 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 64,778 acres · 67th regional percentile · 90th national percentile2009: 31,782 acres · 55th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2010: 164,907 acres · 89th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2011: 12,227 acres · 90th regional percentile · 66th national percentile2012: 11,471 acres · 87th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2013: 27,674 acres · 61st regional percentile · 74th national percentile2014: 20,873 acres · 75th regional percentile · 66th national percentile2015: 51,900 acres · 77th regional percentile · 89th national percentile2016: 43,667 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 85th national percentile2017: 51,657 acres · 74th regional percentile · 84th national percentile2018: 59,802 acres · 79th regional percentile · 86th national percentile2019: 76,041 acres · 78th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2020: 82,343 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 94th national percentile2021: 59,815 acres · 87th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2022: 58,499 acres · 87th regional percentile · 92nd national percentile2023: 59,630 acres · 88th regional percentile · 93rd national percentile2024: 69 acres · 17th regional percentile · 25th national percentile2025: 7,946 acres · 62nd regional percentile · 62nd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

71.2production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
17,632 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47179:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
17,632 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:6554239ce2d25cf5ca846acfb21a
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
38,648 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47179:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
38,648 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4410e86f4e34c04734ecbf978393
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
402 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47179:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
402 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:218bdc0d22179249bf4964f54f7e
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
1,333 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47179:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,333 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1abdf6c695e0d0f4109493bf14f4
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47179:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:40327905991f0c960388fd4629e1
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
385 head

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47179:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
385 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:65c7bc93ccd1e5710c41a36c3f43
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
33,504 acres

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47179:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
33,504 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8e4537b77203bb96f381bc85d67c
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
829 farms

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47179:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
829 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e63f00c97c3e2667e1c8ef066130
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
277 acres

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47179:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
277 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:c3590dec1c0579566c084d9e12ad
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
15 farms

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47179:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
15 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2a178930bd6f6c1306faedfb9485
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
0.8 percent

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47179:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a8f8ae4f426b36114f20fc0162b5
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
80,500 tons

Washington County · 2022

How calculated

Washington County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
47179:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
80,500 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d7c1b3d30e2e2b550f265f752122
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Fescue benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation44 in
How calculated

BRISTOL TRI CITY AP, TN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a9ec6838ccd2281172b73dd16054
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature56.6 °F
How calculated

BRISTOL TRI CITY AP, TN US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2e71e3898ebb11dfef4321c1086c
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance5.4 miles
How calculated

BRISTOL TRI CITY AP, TN US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Gray reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3a9cfef5a179b662b2d293cce371
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Gray · 2026

How calculated

Gray · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:03d0a7acc91ecaaa8d4a3ab74170
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Gray · 2026

How calculated

Gray · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b8e4916adcccac14c12b3fb2214b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Gray · 2026

How calculated

Gray · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3dbb10306b81a73791355fd2fc9b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Gray · 2026

How calculated

Gray · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ffb3bb4c58fbf6b3baccc206b409
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Gray · 2026

How calculated

Gray · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ff6bd69abfacdef6d78d788c445e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Gray · 2026

How calculated

Gray · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:e5e9379c5ed909c7520592781455
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
26 weeks

Gray · 2026

How calculated

Gray · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d82d406dc631fa2d7830dee8bfb9
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
50 0-100

Gray · 2026

How calculated

Gray · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:373b3d1c4099c171f0db72c2f46c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
39.1 0-100

Gray · 2026

How calculated

Gray · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:55ea83c0e1b7ec9c2cc8aaf6f03d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Gray · 2026

How calculated

Gray · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:143f6ebe76051ef97cd75b8ae49a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
52.3 percent

Gray · 2026

How calculated

Gray · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7a25c1e8319fcd1698e7874c2c5c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
9 percent

Gray · 2026

How calculated

Gray · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:d7ea0e2a97481900
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0de96fb5fbebb50c2b4904f6ca24
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

45.2sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Fescue Hay in Gray?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Fescue Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Fescue Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.