Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Fescue Hay
in Bismarck, Missouri

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Fescue hay serving Bismarck.

Request Fescue Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint7,006.3 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth57.5 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence73.7 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty52.3 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal45.2 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Bismarck, but it does not measure how much is specifically Fescue hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 7,006 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 37th percentile among 9,729 analyzed Missouri localities and the 55th percentile nationally. St. Francois County reports 14,949 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Brewer, Missouri, 39 miles away with 24,678 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 37th percentile among analyzed Missouri localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Fescue hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

73.7 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 19,952 acres · 35th regional percentile · 67th national percentile2009: 11,913 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 61st national percentile2010: 0 acres · 67th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 70th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 13,895 acres · 36th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2013: 14,911 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 60th national percentile2014: 20,325 acres · 38th regional percentile · 65th national percentile2015: 14,889 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 61st national percentile2016: 19,070 acres · 34th regional percentile · 66th national percentile2017: 17,939 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 59th national percentile2018: 23,234 acres · 33rd regional percentile · 61st national percentile2019: 26,805 acres · 32nd regional percentile · 65th national percentile2020: 24,824 acres · 28th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2021: 19,670 acres · 35th regional percentile · 64th national percentile2022: 18,618 acres · 28th regional percentile · 62nd national percentile2023: 13,261 acres · 26th regional percentile · 54th national percentile2024: 52 acres · 19th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2025: 7,006 acres · 37th regional percentile · 56th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

57.5production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
8,947 head

St. Francois County · 2022

How calculated

St. Francois County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29187:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
8,947 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:75af6dc9572d22a49b534373334c
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
16,366 head

St. Francois County · 2022

How calculated

St. Francois County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29187:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
16,366 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3ef3fe92454b5500e3dada9e39c8
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
67 head

St. Francois County · 2022

How calculated

St. Francois County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29187:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
67 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2ed6378f6bcbce51398bbf932d11
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
685 head

St. Francois County · 2022

How calculated

St. Francois County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29187:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
685 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0f6c3703cca7ceb77551877d558e
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.9 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

St. Francois County · 2022

How calculated

St. Francois County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29187:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3e4406c876af82fc8d9182d3a10b
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
536 head

St. Francois County · 2022

How calculated

St. Francois County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29187:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
536 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9605b2139ef0aa7fe97855a75bfa
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
16,950 acres

St. Francois County · 2022

How calculated

St. Francois County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29187:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
16,950 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:44931ace508a75718f5eb75f43ba
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
284 farms

St. Francois County · 2022

How calculated

St. Francois County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29187:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
284 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:be38c5fb22fa5862c10abf311f6c
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

St. Francois County · 2022

How calculated

St. Francois County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29187:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bcae3702291e078cbec7e249050d
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

St. Francois County · 2022

How calculated

St. Francois County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29187:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:21d42a5912c76ef46125ec93da88
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
28,690 tons

St. Francois County · 2022

How calculated

St. Francois County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29187:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
28,690 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4562021dbf51cdb77cc1f96d47b1
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.7 tons/acre

St. Francois County · 2022

How calculated

St. Francois County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
29187:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e098c66e901591b7eb555e5d14f3
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Fescue benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation45.2 in
How calculated

FARMINGTON, MO US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b9e6455a4cc9499dca3990090893
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature56.1 °F
How calculated

FARMINGTON, MO US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:29d9757afd18a20cf464911b3ca6
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance11.7 miles
How calculated

FARMINGTON, MO US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Bismarck reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ce1b5ce68903ad0a8d4f4e97562e
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bismarck · 2026

How calculated

Bismarck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:965a5d712c1ae2151845f002c494
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bismarck · 2026

How calculated

Bismarck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5f127c15419e00700df544b74198
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Bismarck · 2026

How calculated

Bismarck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c6f8ca3070d73e301b081128516a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Bismarck · 2026

How calculated

Bismarck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c15427b5147a1aa5f5ffb2d6cc74
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Bismarck · 2026

How calculated

Bismarck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:277a0e6c66826018f189265604a8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Bismarck · 2026

How calculated

Bismarck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:a27e64e9e91de468e9425e75bc5e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
16 weeks

Bismarck · 2026

How calculated

Bismarck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:af9259f0bd5c7064bef1f5f8b864
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
19.7 0-100

Bismarck · 2026

How calculated

Bismarck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:45a8baba1796ecfb50c486cbf51d
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
26.5 0-100

Bismarck · 2026

How calculated

Bismarck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:98d5fac9a3b09c01cea141877560
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Bismarck · 2026

How calculated

Bismarck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:5718efd7d0f9d88134cb59af639b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
41.6 percent

Bismarck · 2026

How calculated

Bismarck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1c9b3c94aec49a29c205fc88f772
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
21.3 percent

Bismarck · 2026

How calculated

Bismarck · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:760caea367ed467e
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:faf6bf1cbef4fae2bbf8544070fc
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

52.3sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Fescue Hay in Bismarck?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Fescue Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Fescue Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.