Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Fescue Hay
in Petoskey, Michigan

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Fescue hay serving Petoskey.

Request Fescue Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint6,985.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth76.3 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence81.5 / 100HIGH
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty44.5 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal34.2 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Petoskey, but it does not measure how much is specifically Fescue hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 6,986 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 67th percentile among 6,705 analyzed Michigan localities and the 55th percentile nationally. Emmet County reports 733 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Kincheloe, Michigan, 68 miles away with 38,195 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 67th percentile among analyzed Michigan localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Fescue hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

81.5 / 100 persistence · HIGH

2008: 34,920 acres · 99th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2009: 19,415 acres · 96th regional percentile · 71st national percentile2010: 47,974 acres · 99th regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2011: 28,782 acres · 95th regional percentile · 78th national percentile2012: 23,551 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 73rd national percentile2013: 30,412 acres · 95th regional percentile · 76th national percentile2014: 25,931 acres · 96th regional percentile · 70th national percentile2015: 21,825 acres · 97th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2016: 16,256 acres · 94th regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2017: 19,312 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 61st national percentile2018: 22,466 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 61st national percentile2019: 22,617 acres · 90th regional percentile · 61st national percentile2020: 7,175 acres · 69th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2021: 7,138 acres · 71st regional percentile · 43rd national percentile2022: 6,407 acres · 74th regional percentile · 41st national percentile2023: 9,006 acres · 79th regional percentile · 47th national percentile2024: 16,689 acres · 98th regional percentile · 98th national percentile2025: 6,986 acres · 67th regional percentile · 55th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

76.3production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
873 head

Emmet County · 2022

How calculated

Emmet County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26047:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
873 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:00a9d5a6f9216e8127b2816f1450
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
2,258 head

Emmet County · 2022

How calculated

Emmet County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26047:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2,258 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7ea38fdf017b63d5885b1a7cdce7
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
301 head

Emmet County · 2022

How calculated

Emmet County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26047:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
301 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:60c8a54a791a4b8ac24cf337d45f
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
195 head

Emmet County · 2022

How calculated

Emmet County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26047:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
195 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7c2f9b43a0385f18d49fe80616ea
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
1.8 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Emmet County · 2022

How calculated

Emmet County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26047:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d761032622a6d2a2baf91ebb0550
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
(D) head

Emmet County · 2022

How calculated

Emmet County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26047:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:41ecec7098cdcb92bb82e31e418a
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
6,654 acres

Emmet County · 2022

How calculated

Emmet County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26047:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,654 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0eece89fac2c36f52370ec424366
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
117 farms

Emmet County · 2022

How calculated

Emmet County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26047:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
117 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:457e7ee4e5ee081925ab3b5c1946
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Emmet County · 2022

How calculated

Emmet County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26047:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:1b348d4bc601f36c192865b73bcc
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
1 farms

Emmet County · 2022

How calculated

Emmet County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26047:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:784acc8255b3c8e4569bdcc75aa0
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
9,515 tons

Emmet County · 2022

How calculated

Emmet County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26047:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
9,515 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5924307519eab44c6998a85a3cfe
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.4 tons/acre

Emmet County · 2022

How calculated

Emmet County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
26047:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0c1b6f48a6eb330390b7af1c78a2
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Fescue benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation34.2 in
How calculated

PETOSKEY, MI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:491fa82bf77731cf3f810ec9bb51
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature44.4 °F
How calculated

PETOSKEY, MI US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0985321da8803b005eb4498723c5
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance1.7 miles
How calculated

PETOSKEY, MI US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Petoskey reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:27848bdc5b36e46775b3400745f4
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Petoskey · 2026

How calculated

Petoskey · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0b20b25376b44e2d5bd26be59731
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Petoskey · 2026

How calculated

Petoskey · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fe1adb116227ef76986de493b98b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Petoskey · 2026

How calculated

Petoskey · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7ceaf6968b79d47f40e3ab13a819
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Petoskey · 2026

How calculated

Petoskey · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f0ac487cf6033eeedb1a6e082e94
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Petoskey · 2026

How calculated

Petoskey · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c92554f977b3785615feab8bad87
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

Petoskey · 2026

How calculated

Petoskey · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bf8f02449a8d204f69f9a69fb904
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
0 weeks

Petoskey · 2026

How calculated

Petoskey · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:98f6db03b871cf9c65579e0571d8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Petoskey · 2026

How calculated

Petoskey · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6d6e2c7ce29709e8e6c8d91e4a4c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Petoskey · 2026

How calculated

Petoskey · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3217f1ebf17fd30af7b4a97cdd2f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

Petoskey · 2026

How calculated

Petoskey · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6c0aafd3fc6decbc5df03962ef04
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Petoskey · 2026

How calculated

Petoskey · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:076529f38f5d144151a536f886e1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Petoskey · 2026

How calculated

Petoskey · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fa6444c3d232b05b
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fc75ebea69b2b9fbfdae8ee53f01
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

44.5sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Fescue Hay in Petoskey?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Fescue Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Fescue Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.