Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Fescue Hay
in Good Hope, Illinois

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Fescue hay serving Good Hope.

Request Fescue Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint10,127.4 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth82.3 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence65 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty40.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal38.5 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Good Hope, but it does not measure how much is specifically Fescue hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 10,127 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 87th percentile among 13,149 analyzed Illinois localities and the 73rd percentile nationally. McDonough County reports 2,845 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Keokuk, Iowa, 40 miles away with 15,558 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 87th percentile among analyzed Illinois localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Fescue hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

65 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 1,213 acres · 77th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2009: 579 acres · 60th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2010: 1,810 acres · 77th regional percentile · 42nd national percentile2011: 42,793 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 82nd national percentile2012: 980 acres · 60th regional percentile · 33rd national percentile2013: 1,469 acres · 68th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2014: 940 acres · 54th regional percentile · 21st national percentile2015: 1,080 acres · 61st regional percentile · 21st national percentile2016: 1,174 acres · 48th regional percentile · 20th national percentile2017: 3,950 acres · 81st regional percentile · 34th national percentile2018: 4,904 acres · 81st regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2019: 6,812 acres · 89th regional percentile · 37th national percentile2020: 6,559 acres · 89th regional percentile · 35th national percentile2021: 3,719 acres · 89th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2022: 3,152 acres · 89th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2023: 2,639 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 26th national percentile2024: 375 acres · 75th regional percentile · 53rd national percentile2025: 10,127 acres · 87th regional percentile · 73rd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

82.3production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
5,733 head

McDonough County · 2022

How calculated

McDonough County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17109:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
5,733 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e2eb7cf612650ff5dab85ac4db23
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
10,196 head

McDonough County · 2022

How calculated

McDonough County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17109:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10,196 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:80d064c5d573f97287eed63af4b3
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
11 head

McDonough County · 2022

How calculated

McDonough County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17109:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
11 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:06bace810e4dd22f7f92a44e2896
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
279 head

McDonough County · 2022

How calculated

McDonough County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17109:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
279 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:23f3d1905548d0ea58f67132a005
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.5 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

McDonough County · 2022

How calculated

McDonough County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17109:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:96dc62c011e4845ee15909abc7f5
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
142 head

McDonough County · 2022

How calculated

McDonough County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17109:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
142 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8a437d51b583c55663f4fcaf0956
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
6,224 acres

McDonough County · 2022

How calculated

McDonough County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17109:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
6,224 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a60a8f2c6908d6eb6f080f123d89
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
190 farms

McDonough County · 2022

How calculated

McDonough County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17109:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
190 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4b2f12106821dc9768b16697dd54
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
- acres

McDonough County · 2022

How calculated

McDonough County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17109:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b414b1f9714cfce8de51583244af
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
- farms

McDonough County · 2022

How calculated

McDonough County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17109:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
- farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cb92f9d351bfcdfad074f533725d
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
18,794 tons

McDonough County · 2022

How calculated

McDonough County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17109:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
18,794 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3559ba73eea6b8b9c3353ded93c1
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
3 tons/acre

McDonough County · 2022

How calculated

McDonough County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
17109:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:899dfd212a65fdd7423664470476
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Fescue benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation38.5 in
How calculated

PRAIRIE CITY 2S, IL US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d726c17dbed4a69a0923d1a25c1e
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature51.5 °F
How calculated

PRAIRIE CITY 2S, IL US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:7cdcc12d9fe65a7ac5a9d259ceb7
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance11.3 miles
How calculated

PRAIRIE CITY 2S, IL US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Good Hope reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cd93a8b3844f65144248e8e0fc7b
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Good Hope · 2026

How calculated

Good Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4c317575ad0e988b8e3c03c59137
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Good Hope · 2026

How calculated

Good Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:09f6325798be19e84ee8b89c92fc
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

Good Hope · 2026

How calculated

Good Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bc743173cc03d0010e93ba4b0011
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

Good Hope · 2026

How calculated

Good Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:899cd52ce707decb727a40c59b0e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

Good Hope · 2026

How calculated

Good Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0b263ed815b64dcfd7eff770a56b
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
IMPROVING category

Good Hope · 2026

How calculated

Good Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:93ae6f41ad6262ac308398ae455a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
29 weeks

Good Hope · 2026

How calculated

Good Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b2638e6f578788140dc50a67a4e5
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Good Hope · 2026

How calculated

Good Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6917b42d25efa76a14540419042f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
58.6 0-100

Good Hope · 2026

How calculated

Good Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:195d9bd4d10d0b4f9a8295a925e6
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
20 0-100

Good Hope · 2026

How calculated

Good Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d0c4b28fb07f4684612a0bb9998e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
50.4 percent

Good Hope · 2026

How calculated

Good Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d6e4b250c658ec0cd7e5609f034f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
28.5 percent

Good Hope · 2026

How calculated

Good Hope · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:fc8517b99d5c7edb
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0851ccffe98e7bfa5788552b0b82
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

40.6sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Fescue Hay in Good Hope?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Fescue Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Fescue Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.