Non-alfalfa hay
Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04
Brome Hay
in Hooper, Utah
Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Brome hay serving Hooper.
Request Brome Hay Quotes
Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.
Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.
Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.
Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.
Local interpretation
What the local hay data shows
USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Hooper, but it does not measure how much is specifically Brome hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 3,676 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 50th percentile among 3,006 analyzed Utah localities and the 33rd percentile nationally. Weber County reports 4,171 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Plymouth, Utah, 50 miles away with 27,880 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 94.6% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.
Buyer decision panel
What the evidence says now
Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED
The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 50th percentile among analyzed Utah localities.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Brome hay.
Trace this statement
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map
Local non-alfalfa hay footprint
Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.
5 mi
0 ac
10 mi
127 ac
25 mi
3,676 ac
50 mi
20,456 ac
100 mi
97,633 ac
150 mi
246,460 ac
250 mi
503,375 ac
Within 25 miles3,676mapped acres · 0.293% of radius · 2025
50th percentile among 3,006 analyzed Utah localities · 33th percentile nationally.
How calculated
Hooper · radius
Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.
- Source
- usda-cdl-2025-30m
- Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174- Source record
16531- Evidence
- FAMILY
- Period
- 2025-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 16531 classified pixels
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:ca37ab4c49187fc1d7e162450864- Official record
- Open source ↗
Footprint history
73 / 100 persistence · HIGH
20082025
Agricultural census
Production & livestock context
The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.
64.4production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
4,878 headWeber County · 2022
How calculated
Weber County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49057:beef_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 4,878 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:2a3c3507b82d0d8d82d718ff1e84- Official record
- Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
16,609 headWeber County · 2022
How calculated
Weber County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49057:cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 16,609 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:247bf4aaae9ac7beecb3d18822ee- Official record
- Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
2,698 headWeber County · 2022
How calculated
Weber County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49057:dairy_cattle:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 2,698 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:4f47fb6c9259dd742055be2bfa21- Official record
- Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
2,731 headWeber County · 2022
How calculated
Weber County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49057:equine:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 2,731 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:fe42a0e0b3b7cb9690a6cb4e3159- Official record
- Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_headWeber County · 2022
How calculated
Weber County · county
Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49057:forage-production-livestock-context:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- reported_hay_acres/reported_head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:8bfca81b0d5c7fc1fe4453950605- Official record
- Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
889 headWeber County · 2022
How calculated
Weber County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49057:goats:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 889 head
- Normalized unit
- head
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:ddf0dcc92bf5e5e69eae58e5b3bd- Official record
- Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
13,727 acresWeber County · 2022
How calculated
Weber County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49057:hay_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 13,727 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:2577797ca666adc718047b47246b- Official record
- Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
574 farmsWeber County · 2022
How calculated
Weber County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49057:hay_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 574 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:6191a0b571656ec10441ff642b66- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
11,578 acresWeber County · 2022
How calculated
Weber County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49057:hay_irrigated_acres:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 11,578 acres
- Normalized unit
- acres
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:7e977ae9e4357f5c66fa671b721d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
533 farmsWeber County · 2022
How calculated
Weber County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49057:hay_irrigated_farms:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 533 farms
- Normalized unit
- farms
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:fdeb92a0353847752ab17229325a- Official record
- Open source ↗
Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL
84.3 percentWeber County · 2022
How calculated
Weber County · county
Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49057:hay:irrigated-share:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:dbdceab774db69d6dc4da755f341- Official record
- Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
46,307 tonsWeber County · 2022
How calculated
Weber County · county
Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.
- Source
- usda-census-ag-2022
- Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984- Source record
49057:hay_production:2022- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2022-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Original
- 46,307 tons
- Normalized unit
- tons
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:3374425955b9a90034df46464539- Official record
- Open source ↗
Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.
Comparable market observations
Price intelligence
No defensible Brome benchmark
No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.
Request current local quotes →Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.
Official 1991–2020 normals
Local climate context
Annual precipitation18.8 in
How calculated
OGDEN SUGAR FACTORY, UT US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- in
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:d96570947abb4b64994f67455e82- Official record
- Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature52.7 °F
How calculated
OGDEN SUGAR FACTORY, UT US · nearest station
Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- °F
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:b6e02e22f1c398b9e99f5b7da003- Official record
- Open source ↗
Station distance17 miles
How calculated
OGDEN SUGAR FACTORY, UT US · nearest station
Great-circle distance from Hooper reference point to the official station.
- Source
- noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
- Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2020-12-31
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- miles
- Freshness
- HISTORICAL
- Fact ID
fact:48983033af0836d53e9c02c83dfb- Official record
- Open source ↗
Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.
Environmental pressure
Drought & moisture context
Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percentHooper · 2026
How calculated
Hooper · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:6859883b12a244f00cb48183674d- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
94.6 percentHooper · 2026
How calculated
Hooper · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:891dd9da9fe8edb86ca340e772f9- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percentHooper · 2026
How calculated
Hooper · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:a8f158756ef33c29fba65fc32816- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 categoryHooper · 2026
How calculated
Hooper · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:b021bc66ded1f3f41bdb1d5496c0- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
58.9 0-100Hooper · 2026
How calculated
Hooper · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:fab8c6f25e0df7bb171f85414c88- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE categoryHooper · 2026
How calculated
Hooper · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- category
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:8df5287ba6936e33631fe91af116- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
53 weeksHooper · 2026
How calculated
Hooper · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- weeks
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:5fdeed66c3e99decd2da54f13d85- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
58.7 0-100Hooper · 2026
How calculated
Hooper · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-06-09
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:6c3fe67ab428f8716a0cccc08cf3- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
34.5 0-100Hooper · 2026
How calculated
Hooper · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-03-03
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:c73b1a51868905cce541967478dc- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
58.9 0-100Hooper · 2026
How calculated
Hooper · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-08-04
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- 0-100
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:8e73b99dd5eb930edeb81fd64474- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
87.4 percentHooper · 2026
How calculated
Hooper · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:c3f765b25324f58a0585d4706047- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
39.4 percentHooper · 2026
How calculated
Hooper · containing county
County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.
- Source
- us-drought-monitor-history
- Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:18f7b95426185342- Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01- Evidence
- GENERAL
- Period
- 2026-09-01
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-04
- Normalized unit
- percent
- Freshness
- LATEST
- Fact ID
fact:6e152aa5ed7f7e01f57f12bb15c2- Official record
- Open source ↗
Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.
HayQuotes marketplace
Visible supply & verified demand
Coverage is still developing
No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.
Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool
Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine
No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.
Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes
Quote A
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Quote B
Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload
$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials
Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph
Strong nearby sourcing candidates
Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.
49.9sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Brome Hay in Plymouth, Utah50.2 mi27,880 ac97.52. Brome Hay in Riverside, Utah46 mi27,157 ac95.83. Brome Hay in Fielding, Utah46.4 mi26,478 ac93.94. Brome Hay in Newton, Utah51.6 mi25,650 ac91.45. Brome Hay in Cache, Utah49.2 mi23,550 ac85.96. Brome Hay in Peter, Utah46 mi20,805 ac78.77. Brome Hay in Garland, Utah40.7 mi20,112 ac77.18. Brome Hay in Tremonton, Utah39.2 mi19,414 ac75.39. Brome Hay in Benson, Utah46.1 mi19,417 ac74.910. Brome Hay in Mendon, Utah42.4 mi18,693 ac73.2Source hay
Need Brome Hay in Hooper?
Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.
Internal market pathways
Continue through the evidence graph
Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.
County and agricultural-region markets
Other strongly supported hay types in Hooper
Alfalfa Hay in Hooper, UtahExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in Hooper, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in Hooper, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in Hooper, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in Hooper, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Hooper, UtahContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail
Methodology & sources
This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.
NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence
EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.
Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Brome Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.
Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.