Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Brome Hay
in McLendon-Chisholm, Texas

Name: Brome market intelligence for McLendon-Chisholm, Texas
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Brome hay serving McLendon-Chisholm.

Request Brome Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Brome Hay Quotes Sell Brome Near McLendon-Chisholm

Evidence strength45/ 100 · FAMILY

Local mapped footprint2,458.4 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth53.4 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence63.8 / 100MODERATE

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty53.7 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal38.4 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Brome Hay Quotes Sell Brome Near McLendon-Chisholm

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around McLendon-Chisholm, but it does not measure how much is specifically Brome hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 2,458 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 35th percentile among 16,767 analyzed Texas localities and the 24th percentile nationally. Rockwall County reports 2,194 head of beef cattle in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Garrett, Texas, 36 miles away with 9,957 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 4.9% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplyMODERATE

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureMODERATE

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 35th percentile among analyzed Texas localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Brome hay.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

5 mi

24 ac

10 mi

48 ac

25 mi

2,458 ac

50 mi

15,962 ac

100 mi

80,286 ac

150 mi

151,483 ac

250 mi

372,825 ac

Within 25 miles2,458mapped acres · 0.196% of radius · 2025

35th percentile among 16,767 analyzed Texas localities · 24th percentile nationally.

How calculated

McLendon-Chisholm · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 11054
Evidence: FAMILY
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 11054 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:9ba2b21b81d3a930b2a3c0f883c8
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

63.8 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

53.4production depth

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

2,194 head

Rockwall County · 2022

How calculated

Rockwall County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 48397:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 2,194 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:05068383db685350317c31b15e48
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

3,519 head

Rockwall County · 2022

How calculated

Rockwall County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 48397:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 3,519 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a6e40a9991f31ddb1f0434594bd4
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

- head

Rockwall County · 2022

How calculated

Rockwall County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 48397:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: - head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a87f30f40e06fa6c469640dcbd4f
Official record: Open source ↗

SheepHISTORICAL

548 head

Rockwall County · 2022

How calculated

Rockwall County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 48397:sheep:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 548 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:e450478481fdab057564033eeb17
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

27,602 head

Kaufman County · 2022

How calculated

Kaufman County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 48257:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 27,602 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:2b6f0aea7a3fc6f1c6f93be06956
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

55,746 head

Kaufman County · 2022

How calculated

Kaufman County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 48257:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 55,746 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b734a48eab88a1b8906a84e7d035
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

7 head

Kaufman County · 2022

How calculated

Kaufman County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 48257:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 7 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:5019f68ff259a1af79906e3c2417
Official record: Open source ↗

SheepHISTORICAL

2,617 head

Kaufman County · 2022

How calculated

Kaufman County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 48257:sheep:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 2,617 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:dc6434ab770604ae5cf767230d52
Official record: Open source ↗

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

2,194 head

Rockwall County · 2022

How calculated

Rockwall County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 48397:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 2,194 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:05068383db685350317c31b15e48
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

3,519 head

Rockwall County · 2022

How calculated

Rockwall County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 48397:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 3,519 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a6e40a9991f31ddb1f0434594bd4
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

- head

Rockwall County · 2022

How calculated

Rockwall County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 48397:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: - head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a87f30f40e06fa6c469640dcbd4f
Official record: Open source ↗

SheepHISTORICAL

548 head

Rockwall County · 2022

How calculated

Rockwall County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 48397:sheep:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 548 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:e450478481fdab057564033eeb17
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Brome benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation38.4 in

How calculated

TERRELL MUNI AP, TX US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:5ce8a7f883824aa7f5944e89fd01
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature66.3 °F

How calculated

TERRELL MUNI AP, TX US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:a4ccf9dfac72624874b2576080da
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance11.9 miles

How calculated

TERRELL MUNI AP, TX US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from McLendon-Chisholm reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:31ef287a2766120c5ab3aedd6efa
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

100 percent

McLendon-Chisholm · 2026

How calculated

McLendon-Chisholm · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:93883b637a32b3110d58210d642c
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

4.9 percent

McLendon-Chisholm · 2026

How calculated

McLendon-Chisholm · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:40570d49fb7beb5df4f5f5f19657
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

McLendon-Chisholm · 2026

How calculated

McLendon-Chisholm · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:4b11363e0f8e84b188e6505d8ae4
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D1 category

McLendon-Chisholm · 2026

How calculated

McLendon-Chisholm · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:e648c33cca7f327b20bd963e710f
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

41 0-100

McLendon-Chisholm · 2026

How calculated

McLendon-Chisholm · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:8ef1e2921b57b9dbb3380f171486
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

WORSENING category

McLendon-Chisholm · 2026

How calculated

McLendon-Chisholm · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:2362ef5c171f7daed695bbfcd04e
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

7 weeks

McLendon-Chisholm · 2026

How calculated

McLendon-Chisholm · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:10c32194816e535422e7736d6357
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

0 0-100

McLendon-Chisholm · 2026

How calculated

McLendon-Chisholm · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:726aa750f5c24ddf005c58e3d79e
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

39.7 0-100

McLendon-Chisholm · 2026

How calculated

McLendon-Chisholm · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:45d511224608bfc8d3d050db8a94
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

0 0-100

McLendon-Chisholm · 2026

How calculated

McLendon-Chisholm · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:9b6426f9bbeb1a9db40b77f91441
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

20.7 percent

McLendon-Chisholm · 2026

How calculated

McLendon-Chisholm · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:68db04de850f347ac2f4f81c2736
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

0.2 percent

McLendon-Chisholm · 2026

How calculated

McLendon-Chisholm · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:d544fc5453dd5837
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:931bc733c8218dcd243dbe3ca6a6
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

53.7sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Brome Hay in Garrett, Texas36 mi9,957 ac98.2 2. Brome Hay in Palmer, Texas33.4 mi9,314 ac93.5 3. Brome Hay in Pecan Hill, Texas33.5 mi8,963 ac90.8 4. Brome Hay in Red Oak, Texas32.6 mi8,905 ac90.4 5. Brome Hay in Oak Leaf, Texas35.5 mi8,517 ac87.4 6. Brome Hay in Bristol, Texas29.6 mi8,252 ac85.7 7. Brome Hay in Bear Creek Ranch, Texas29.4 mi7,807 ac82.3 8. Brome Hay in Glenn Heights, Texas33.8 mi7,541 ac80.1 9. Brome Hay in Rosser, Texas27.1 mi7,487 ac80 10. Brome Hay in Ferris, Texas27.1 mi7,422 ac79.6

Source hay

Need Brome Hay in McLendon-Chisholm?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Brome Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Brome Hay markets in Rockwall Countycounty Brome Hay markets in Kaufman Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in McLendon-Chisholm

Alfalfa Hay in McLendon-Chisholm, TexasExact-type evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Brome Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 53 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Brome Hayin McLendon-Chisholm, Texas

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Brome Hay in McLendon-Chisholm?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in McLendon-Chisholm

Methodology & sources

Brome Hay
in McLendon-Chisholm, Texas