Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Brome Hay
in Parker, South Dakota

Name: Brome market intelligence for Parker, South Dakota
Creator: HayQuotes
License: https://hayquotes.com/terms

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Brome hay serving Parker.

Request Brome Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Request Brome Hay Quotes Sell Brome Near Parker

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY

Local mapped footprint7,698.9 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth48.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence66.7 / 100MODERATE

Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS

Sourcing difficulty56.6 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal27.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL

Request Brome Hay Quotes Sell Brome Near Parker

Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Parker, but it does not measure how much is specifically Brome hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 7,699 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 25th percentile among 4,365 analyzed South Dakota localities and the 60th percentile nationally. Turner County reports 3,311 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Beaver Creek, Minnesota, 41 miles away with 19,084 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 83.3% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED

Local supplyMODERATE

Nearby sourcingSTRONG

Drought pressureMODERATE

MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 25th percentile among analyzed South Dakota localities.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Brome hay.

Trace this statement

usda-cdl-2025-30m

Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

5 mi

190 ac

10 mi

1,114 ac

25 mi

7,699 ac

50 mi

33,762 ac

100 mi

205,981 ac

150 mi

400,530 ac

250 mi

1,129,477 ac

Within 25 miles7,699mapped acres · 0.613% of radius · 2025

25th percentile among 4,365 analyzed South Dakota localities · 60th percentile nationally.

How calculated

Parker · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source: usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot: usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record: 34618
Evidence: FAMILY
Period: 2025-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 34618 classified pixels
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:6ae4ae6ad79d2c104c5528029ce3
Official record: Open source ↗

Footprint history

66.7 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

20082025

Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

48.8production depth

Beef CattleHISTORICAL

8,895 head

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46125:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 8,895 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:3a234fd568759956b4b488d922ce
Official record: Open source ↗

CattleHISTORICAL

49,307 head

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46125:cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 49,307 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:dd5e45d41d585bda13f52d2f5b15
Official record: Open source ↗

Dairy CattleHISTORICAL

16,225 head

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46125:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 16,225 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:b6d7dc0069b118178118bcb4daa6
Official record: Open source ↗

EquineHISTORICAL

288 head

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46125:equine:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 288 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:9ad32007f4048de04fffc5a446cf
Official record: Open source ↗

Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL

0.2 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46125:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:e6ffef447159f7e86f0a6db98bac
Official record: Open source ↗

GoatsHISTORICAL

421 head

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46125:goats:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 421 head
Normalized unit: head
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:f28d7147f6af441130c2ee15760a
Official record: Open source ↗

AcresHISTORICAL

13,248 acres

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46125:hay_acres:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 13,248 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:d50317b8eaaf24fd311d5380329a
Official record: Open source ↗

FarmsHISTORICAL

233 farms

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46125:hay_farms:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 233 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:2503a30dd9be437de006c31f526e
Official record: Open source ↗

Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL

440 acres

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46125:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 440 acres
Normalized unit: acres
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:8ed7ee2bb5393d1502ffb267a79a
Official record: Open source ↗

Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL

11 farms

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46125:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 11 farms
Normalized unit: farms
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:26490c88abefe7decf7ee584f886
Official record: Open source ↗

Irrigated ShareHISTORICAL

3.3 percent

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Reported irrigated harvested acres divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46125:hay:irrigated-share:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:e6e390b78ab694bbe1daed92f905
Official record: Open source ↗

ProductionHISTORICAL

29,949 tons

Turner County · 2022

How calculated

Turner County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source: usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot: usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record: 46125:hay_production:2022
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2022-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Original: 29,949 tons
Normalized unit: tons
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:485e6363536da467bb56725ff93a
Official record: Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Brome benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation27.9 in

How calculated

BRIDGEWATER, SD US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: in
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:36fcddf4217dc351cf0bb095b080
Official record: Open source ↗

Annual mean temperature46.4 °F

How calculated

BRIDGEWATER, SD US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: °F
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:c07bbb8b1833d6269577369448e4
Official record: Open source ↗

Station distance21.3 miles

How calculated

BRIDGEWATER, SD US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Parker reference point to the official station.

Source: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot: noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2020-12-31
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: miles
Freshness: HISTORICAL
Fact ID: fact:5c0cf6c560f6cb3d317cfb228f7b
Official record: Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST

100 percent

Parker · 2026

How calculated

Parker · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:36af4585ab790fee8a19eb788680
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST

83.3 percent

Parker · 2026

How calculated

Parker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:6914222d6ff8c06f443d5c8657d3
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST

0 percent

Parker · 2026

How calculated

Parker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:18d0e4811765ccefa3a2715bfa30
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST

D2 category

Parker · 2026

How calculated

Parker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:4e0bf10f121241aa7d8aee32856d
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST

56.7 0-100

Parker · 2026

How calculated

Parker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:c00e471566a5058538f655349085
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Four Week TrendLATEST

WORSENING category

Parker · 2026

How calculated

Parker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: category
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:c3dc18215fdbb7f2c164ffa2c85a
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST

47 weeks

Parker · 2026

How calculated

Parker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: weeks
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:40c963bccdf6d2549c8ef4dee419
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST

54.5 0-100

Parker · 2026

How calculated

Parker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-06-09
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:e345dde3abb8cc64033000e0d581
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST

40.1 0-100

Parker · 2026

How calculated

Parker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-03-03
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:ccdfe10a828783e564089b5bea7e
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST

40.1 0-100

Parker · 2026

How calculated

Parker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-08-04
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: 0-100
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:7201b57946fb7217834dd9cfe08d
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST

88.2 percent

Parker · 2026

How calculated

Parker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:065e72fd684d75f7154b774b82f6
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST

29 percent

Parker · 2026

How calculated

Parker · containing county

Source: us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot: us-drought-monitor-history:fabc237a2c65154d
Source record: drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence: GENERAL
Period: 2026-09-01
Retrieved: 2026-09-04
Normalized unit: percent
Freshness: LATEST
Fact ID: fact:0e0783881b96396a05474f6a9368
Official record: Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.

Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Bale countWeight per bale (lb)

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Pickup price / baleLoaded route milesFreight / loaded mileUnloading totalStacking totalOther chargesPayload / load

Delivered total$0.00

Delivered equivalent—

Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.

Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

56.6sourcing difficulty

Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength

1. Brome Hay in Beaver Creek, Minnesota41.4 mi19,084 ac97.9 2. Brome Hay in Tripp, South Dakota43.5 mi18,163 ac94.2 3. Brome Hay in Hills, Minnesota39.8 mi18,005 ac93.8 4. Brome Hay in Lester, Iowa40.4 mi17,587 ac92.1 5. Brome Hay in Parkston, South Dakota42.8 mi17,000 ac89.7 6. Brome Hay in Dimock, South Dakota43.2 mi17,005 ac89.7 7. Brome Hay in Valley Springs, South Dakota35.8 mi16,052 ac86.3 8. Brome Hay in Larchwood, Iowa35.2 mi15,833 ac85.5 9. Brome Hay in Sherman, South Dakota41.3 mi15,836 ac85.2 10. Brome Hay in Alvord, Iowa41.9 mi15,863 ac85.2

Source hay

Need Brome Hay in Parker?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Brome Hay Quotes

Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Brome Hay markets in Turner Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in Parker

Alfalfa Hay in Parker, South DakotaExact-type evidence in this locality Barley Hay in Parker, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Bermudagrass Hay in Parker, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Clover Hay in Parker, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Fescue Hay in Parker, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality Grass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in Parker, South DakotaContextual local forage evidence in this locality

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station

1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗

National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics

rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter

202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter

202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗

USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level

2022countyOfficial source ↗

Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Brome Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 66 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.

Brome Hayin Parker, South Dakota

What the local hay data shows

What the evidence says now

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Footprint history

Production & livestock context

Price intelligence

Local climate context

Drought & moisture context

Visible supply & verified demand

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

Quote A

Quote B

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Need Brome Hay in Parker?

Continue through the evidence graph

County and agricultural-region markets

Other strongly supported hay types in Parker

Methodology & sources

Brome Hay
in Parker, South Dakota