Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Brome Hay
in Hunter, Oklahoma

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Brome hay serving Hunter.

Request Brome Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint4,975.6 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth75.1 / 100HIGH

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence48.2 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty43.2 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal33.9 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around Hunter, but it does not measure how much is specifically Brome hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 4,976 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 83rd percentile among 7,614 analyzed Oklahoma localities and the 42nd percentile nationally. Garfield County reports 40,398 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Arkansas City, Kansas, 49 miles away with 12,280 mapped acres. The current drought signal is 87.3% as of 2026-09-01, which can affect how quickly buyers should confirm quality and freight.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplySTRONG
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureMODERATE
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 83rd percentile among analyzed Oklahoma localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Brome hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

Production evidence is relatively strong, but HayQuotes currently has no observed active supplier coverage in this market.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY

Footprint history

48.2 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 9,239 acres · 47th regional percentile · 52nd national percentile2009: 5,866 acres · 43rd regional percentile · 49th national percentile2010: 0 acres · 100th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 100th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 0 acres · 95th regional percentile · 19th national percentile2013: 0 acres · 72nd regional percentile · 5th national percentile2014: 0 acres · 73rd regional percentile · 4th national percentile2015: 21,576 acres · 96th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2016: 12,309 acres · 89th regional percentile · 57th national percentile2017: 9,188 acres · 86th regional percentile · 49th national percentile2018: 24,615 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 63rd national percentile2019: 25,650 acres · 83rd regional percentile · 64th national percentile2020: 31,998 acres · 90th regional percentile · 68th national percentile2021: 31,599 acres · 94th regional percentile · 77th national percentile2022: 32,943 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 77th national percentile2023: 34,309 acres · 93rd regional percentile · 79th national percentile2024: 85 acres · 56th regional percentile · 28th national percentile2025: 4,976 acres · 84th regional percentile · 42nd national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

75.1production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40047:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a2bcb1ca1b271a0f36348079857a
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
65,380 head

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40047:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
65,380 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:fa78a78184c77d534045bcda881b
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
(D) head

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40047:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d394b091121a7d3d2b9466c80d81
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
899 head

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40047:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
899 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:0af55a3e330eaa819749f0990d41
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40047:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:994d7f2d1a6b52b0b811bc57d53a
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
1,330 head

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40047:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
1,330 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:74b8d1934ebf7dec46525b3238a0
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
43,004 acres

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40047:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
43,004 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:9970fbfe0bee249ae52fb33114a4
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
310 farms

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40047:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
310 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:a207468de8f83e6fe4c3d1fa68fb
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40047:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cc0a70e302eda88f6ddb375fe153
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
4 farms

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40047:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:bcfb2c833b22b0a23583535352a6
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
56,527 tons

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40047:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
56,527 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:3e76d833bed34bee0389468d4511
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
1.3 tons/acre

Garfield County · 2022

How calculated

Garfield County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
40047:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2d1f712cad4ad004cb3f9aa2dd81
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Brome benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation33.9 in
How calculated

JEFFERSON 3SE, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4172ab260a2d0482b15599633a3a
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature57.5 °F
How calculated

JEFFERSON 3SE, OK US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ea28a55dad377f6ca5b4affffe49
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance9.7 miles
How calculated

JEFFERSON 3SE, OK US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from Hunter reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:b819cce41a0f59f348afcd3fad34
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
100 percent

Hunter · 2026

How calculated

Hunter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c445532384dee4383ddf86c4a874
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
87.3 percent

Hunter · 2026

How calculated

Hunter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:3a1e2ec8c8dc926a45799467cbe1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
38.5 percent

Hunter · 2026

How calculated

Hunter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:bfdf4ac205a8097e758af665b64f
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
D2 category

Hunter · 2026

How calculated

Hunter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9e70b991e2850635cd815cef5d3a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
65.8 0-100

Hunter · 2026

How calculated

Hunter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:26b1f7e645256c5fb45bf99fe36c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
WORSENING category

Hunter · 2026

How calculated

Hunter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f2ffdc2b8cb8f3b3e96d78e69681
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
28 weeks

Hunter · 2026

How calculated

Hunter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:fe2943db504205c8999be9adb045
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
58.6 0-100

Hunter · 2026

How calculated

Hunter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:4baaa34023413eebd3ba15f526d8
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
51.3 0-100

Hunter · 2026

How calculated

Hunter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:0021386e0f42f77e54bdd69968e1
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
51.1 0-100

Hunter · 2026

How calculated

Hunter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:9c366d69ab2960967ced72cbe710
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
52.3 percent

Hunter · 2026

How calculated

Hunter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b430881c2e00d98a4c7ed4ac6500
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
31.9 percent

Hunter · 2026

How calculated

Hunter · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:c82e1be40c9ae34d
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:1de0ddd0a3caaed65c520b5694ad
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent
LoadsEnter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

43.2sourcing difficulty
Source hay

Need Brome Hay in Hunter?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Brome Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Brome Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.