HayQuotesGet local quotes

Local Hay Intelligence · Updated 2026-09-04

Brome Hay
in McComb, Ohio

Compare local and regional supply, market data, and delivered or pickup options for Brome hay serving McComb.

Request Brome Hay Quotes

Tell us the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. HayQuotes matches the request with suitable suppliers.

Evidence strength55/ 100 · FAMILY
Local mapped footprint5,845.2 acres within 25 miFAMILY

Non-alfalfa hay

Production depth44.8 / 100MODERATE

Evidence of production capacity; not tons available for sale.

Footprint persistence68.1 / 100MODERATE
Price benchmark— NO DEFENSIBLE BENCHMARK

Sample count and comparability are required before publishing an aggregate.

Supplier depth0 active suppliers within 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Verified demand0 requests / 90 days / 50 miNO CURRENT OBSERVATIONS
Sourcing difficulty56.5 / 100MODERATE

Deterministic composite of production depth, supplier coverage, sourcing distance and price-discovery radius.

Annual precipitation normal36 in1991–2020 NORMAL
Request Brome Hay Quotes Sell Brome Near McComb
Local interpretation

What the local hay data shows

USDA mapping identifies non-alfalfa hay around McComb, but it does not measure how much is specifically Brome hay. The latest 2025 raster shows 5,845 mapped acres within 25 miles, placing the market in the 17th percentile among 11,385 analyzed Ohio localities and the 47th percentile nationally. Hancock County reports 940 acres of reported other hay acreage in 2022, giving HayQuotes regional production context without treating that published geography as live city inventory. No compatible public price benchmark is stored for this market, so the page does not invent pricing. The sourcing graph points to nearby alternatives such as Kenton, Ohio, 33 miles away with 12,873 mapped acres. HayQuotes has not yet stored enough recent marketplace observations here to publish supplier liquidity, so quote requests are the check for bale format, freight, timing, and availability.

Buyer decision panel

What the evidence says now

Price dataLIMITED
Local supplyMODERATE
Nearby sourcingSTRONG
Drought pressureLOW
MarketplaceLIMITED

The 25-mile mapped non-alfalfa hay footprint ranks at the 17th percentile among analyzed Ohio localities.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m

This raster evidence is broader non-alfalfa hay context; it does not identify how much is specifically Brome hay.

Trace this statement
  • usda-cdl-2025-30m
Satellite crop map

Local non-alfalfa hay footprint

Mapped acreage is shown by sourcing radius. It is land-cover evidence, not inventory available for sale.

FAMILY
Within 25 miles5,845mapped acres · 0.465% of radius · 2025

17th percentile among 11,385 analyzed Ohio localities · 47th percentile nationally.

How calculated

McComb · radius

Counts preserve native CDL pixels in 32×32 blocks; a block is included in a radial total when its projected center falls inside the requested radius. Acreage uses the raster's projected pixel area.

Source
usda-cdl-2025-30m
Snapshot
usda-cdl-2025-30m:3621cf215579b174
Source record
26283
Evidence
FAMILY
Period
2025-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
26283 classified pixels
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:ee7591b16a7b0f9e63bf86e6d910
Official record
Open source ↗

Footprint history

68.1 / 100 persistence · MODERATE

2008: 1,276 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 26th national percentile2009: 685 acres · 2nd regional percentile · 21st national percentile2010: 887 acres · 3rd regional percentile · 34th national percentile2011: 0 acres · 80th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2012: 715 acres · 4th regional percentile · 31st national percentile2013: 888 acres · 4th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2014: 1,346 acres · 8th regional percentile · 23rd national percentile2015: 1,643 acres · 6th regional percentile · 26th national percentile2016: 1,413 acres · 7th regional percentile · 22nd national percentile2017: 868 acres · 4th regional percentile · 14th national percentile2018: 5,593 acres · 18th regional percentile · 34th national percentile2019: 5,087 acres · 9th regional percentile · 32nd national percentile2020: 4,733 acres · 8th regional percentile · 30th national percentile2021: 3,197 acres · 9th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2022: 3,300 acres · 10th regional percentile · 29th national percentile2023: 5,052 acres · 14th regional percentile · 36th national percentile2024: 812 acres · 92nd regional percentile · 65th national percentile2025: 5,845 acres · 17th regional percentile · 47th national percentile
20082025
Agricultural census

Production & livestock context

The smallest published agricultural geography is shown with each measure. These values are never attributed directly to the city.

44.8production depth
Beef CattleHISTORICAL
968 head

Hancock County · 2022

How calculated

Hancock County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39063:beef_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
968 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:487ad73ee1fceafaf41d4b5128b0
Official record
Open source ↗
CattleHISTORICAL
4,575 head

Hancock County · 2022

How calculated

Hancock County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39063:cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
4,575 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:2ea9f1fa0d5990478d4251a2723d
Official record
Open source ↗
Dairy CattleHISTORICAL
928 head

Hancock County · 2022

How calculated

Hancock County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39063:dairy_cattle:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
928 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:5dda26dd9515cb38b163397d8714
Official record
Open source ↗
EquineHISTORICAL
459 head

Hancock County · 2022

How calculated

Hancock County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39063:equine:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
459 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ee9d999f0046f89579432f401839
Official record
Open source ↗
Forage Production To Livestock ContextHISTORICAL
0.6 reported_hay_acres/reported_head

Hancock County · 2022

How calculated

Hancock County · county

Reported all-hay acres divided by the sum of reported cattle, equine, sheep, and goat inventories. This is context, not consumption or a shortage estimate.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39063:forage-production-livestock-context:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
reported_hay_acres/reported_head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:cab2f7691c8fffa02ae51ef1a280
Official record
Open source ↗
GoatsHISTORICAL
388 head

Hancock County · 2022

How calculated

Hancock County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39063:goats:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
388 head
Normalized unit
head
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:ce5860b9cba9a0b4ee5085bf6ee1
Official record
Open source ↗
AcresHISTORICAL
3,557 acres

Hancock County · 2022

How calculated

Hancock County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39063:hay_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
3,557 acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:99776ece052401de6c37af35b103
Official record
Open source ↗
FarmsHISTORICAL
150 farms

Hancock County · 2022

How calculated

Hancock County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39063:hay_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
150 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:28e5bc0cb8605977cd258da09b9a
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated AcresHISTORICAL
(D) acres

Hancock County · 2022

How calculated

Hancock County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39063:hay_irrigated_acres:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
(D) acres
Normalized unit
acres
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d228c11e534f21ad745aaffd42ee
Official record
Open source ↗
Irrigated FarmsHISTORICAL
2 farms

Hancock County · 2022

How calculated

Hancock County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39063:hay_irrigated_farms:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
2 farms
Normalized unit
farms
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:e71a1c47b3d2eeea811ad9f26034
Official record
Open source ↗
ProductionHISTORICAL
10,211 tons

Hancock County · 2022

How calculated

Hancock County · county

Published agricultural statistic; source status and original value retained.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39063:hay_production:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Original
10,211 tons
Normalized unit
tons
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:8ce11cb81b23400fb4b83f040685
Official record
Open source ↗
Reported YieldHISTORICAL
2.9 tons/acre

Hancock County · 2022

How calculated

Hancock County · county

Reported production divided by reported harvested acres at the same published geography and vintage.

Source
usda-census-ag-2022
Snapshot
usda-census-ag-2022:fa5f6c110b3c0984
Source record
39063:hay:reported-yield:2022
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2022-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
tons/acre
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:af0d0121da693cfa8cd0e3615158
Official record
Open source ↗

Production depth measures evidence of production capacity; it is not an estimate of tons available for sale.

Comparable market observations

Price intelligence

No defensible Brome benchmark

No sufficiently comparable current observation is stored for this market. HayQuotes does not substitute an incompatible price.

Request current local quotes →

Only compatible type, quality, package, sale-basis, unit, geography and time observations may be aggregated.

Official 1991–2020 normals

Local climate context

Annual precipitation36.1 in
How calculated

HOYTVILLE 2 NE, OH US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
in
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:d04cd2f5654700122137d624d638
Official record
Open source ↗
Annual mean temperature50.8 °F
How calculated

HOYTVILLE 2 NE, OH US · nearest station

Nearest official station with complete temperature and precipitation normals.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
°F
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:4345bf80f5f874ed64e959f84dcb
Official record
Open source ↗
Station distance7.7 miles
How calculated

HOYTVILLE 2 NE, OH US · nearest station

Great-circle distance from McComb reference point to the official station.

Source
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020
Snapshot
noaa-climate-normals-annual-1991-2020:0fdb814203150780
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2020-12-31
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
miles
Freshness
HISTORICAL
Fact ID
fact:526eb28a590ee3525f363197a4b9
Official record
Open source ↗

Climate normals provide environmental context and do not predict yield.

Environmental pressure

Drought & moisture context

Drought Current Area D1 PlusLATEST
0 percent

McComb · 2026

How calculated

McComb · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:current_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:6d197954a68e07116cd4ee334a49
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D2 PlusLATEST
0 percent

McComb · 2026

How calculated

McComb · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:current_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:96f75b76630f49762e0b2ccc5c6c
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Area D3 PlusLATEST
0 percent

McComb · 2026

How calculated

McComb · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:current_area_d3_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:b824bb5aa8ef2ddce30afd2de991
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Category Majority AreaLATEST
NONE category

McComb · 2026

How calculated

McComb · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:current_category_majority_area:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:280287378f7929fefe8a2dcd7997
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Current Pressure ScoreLATEST
0 0-100

McComb · 2026

How calculated

McComb · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:current_pressure_score:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:d7163aa67d1da5c703a7d17e7c2e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Four Week TrendLATEST
STABLE category

McComb · 2026

How calculated

McComb · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:four_week_trend:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
category
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:392dc0ebcffc4c8c6d7ad51ff871
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Longest Recent Majority D1 Plus RunLATEST
31 weeks

McComb · 2026

How calculated

McComb · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:longest_recent_majority_d1_plus_run:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
weeks
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:dc22c92fdb70f6001d16a4229d60
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 12 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

McComb · 2026

How calculated

McComb · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:pressure_score_12_weeks_ago:2026-06-09
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-06-09
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:c0d8a90d1897744fa082020f6b1a
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 26 Weeks AgoLATEST
48.7 0-100

McComb · 2026

How calculated

McComb · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:pressure_score_26_weeks_ago:2026-03-03
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-03-03
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:8978ca8bea7ee40584e16880104e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Pressure Score 4 Weeks AgoLATEST
0 0-100

McComb · 2026

How calculated

McComb · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:pressure_score_4_weeks_ago:2026-08-04
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-08-04
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
0-100
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:7324d7ca6ba6a4f1d41b2a65756e
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D1 PlusLATEST
53.1 percent

McComb · 2026

How calculated

McComb · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d1_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:17e3ecc54fc3957d8e43ca703c90
Official record
Open source ↗
Drought Trailing Year Mean Area D2 PlusLATEST
28.3 percent

McComb · 2026

How calculated

McComb · containing county

County percentage-of-area statistics attached through the locality's TIGER/Line containing county. Pressure is an acreage-weighted 0–100 transformation of exclusive D0–D4 shares; it does not estimate production or price.

Source
us-drought-monitor-history
Snapshot
us-drought-monitor-history:0a7372f16fed8fe2
Source record
drought:trailing_year_mean_area_d2_plus:2026-09-01
Evidence
GENERAL
Period
2026-09-01
Retrieved
2026-09-04
Normalized unit
percent
Freshness
LATEST
Fact ID
fact:f2926687f294834a18b0ad96d0bc
Official record
Open source ↗

Drought and weather pressure provide environmental context; they do not estimate production or price.

HayQuotes marketplace

Visible supply & verified demand

Coverage is still developing

No recent HayQuotes marketplace observations are available yet for this local market.

Market balanceINSUFFICIENT DATALiquidity: — / 100 · INSUFFICIENT DATAPublic aggregates require at least 3 comparable observations.
Decision tool

Delivered-cost, bale & truckload engine

No bale weight, payload, route mileage, or freight rate is assumed. Use the figures supplied with each quote.

Order weight0.00 short tons0 lb · 0.00 metric tonnes

Quote A

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Quote B

Delivered total$0.00
Delivered equivalent—
Loads—Enter payload

$0.00 hay + $0.00 freight + $0.00 accessorials

Comparable delivered resultComplete both quotes to compare delivered totals.
Geographic market graph

Strong nearby sourcing candidates

Ranked from the precomputed locality graph using type-aware mapped evidence and distance. Mapped land is not inventory for sale.

56.5sourcing difficulty
Rank · marketDistanceMapped contextStrength
1. Brome Hay in Kenton, Ohio33.3 mi12,873 ac98.32. Brome Hay in McGuffey, Ohio28.6 mi12,300 ac95.23. Brome Hay in Dola, Ohio22.7 mi11,833 ac92.84. Brome Hay in Dunkirk, Ohio23.3 mi11,676 ac91.95. Brome Hay in Alger, Ohio27.6 mi11,634 ac91.46. Brome Hay in Ada, Ohio23.5 mi11,336 ac89.97. Brome Hay in Patterson, Ohio26.3 mi11,181 ac88.88. Brome Hay in Forest, Ohio25.3 mi11,073 ac88.29. Brome Hay in Harrod, Ohio28.4 mi10,635 ac85.510. Brome Hay in Arlington, Ohio16.3 mi10,363 ac84.6
Source hay

Need Brome Hay in McComb?

Tell HayQuotes the quantity, bale format, delivery or pickup preference, and timing once. We route the request to suitable suppliers and collect quotes for comparison.

Get Brome Hay Quotes
Internal market pathways

Continue through the evidence graph

Geographic hubs organize the evidence below this locality. Other hay types appear when the same market has enough exact or contextual support to be useful.

County and agricultural-region markets

Brome Hay markets in Hancock Countycounty

Other strongly supported hay types in McComb

Alfalfa Hay in McComb, OhioExact-type evidence in this localityBarley Hay in McComb, OhioContextual local forage evidence in this localityBermudagrass Hay in McComb, OhioContextual local forage evidence in this localityClover Hay in McComb, OhioContextual local forage evidence in this localityFescue Hay in McComb, OhioContextual local forage evidence in this localityGrass / Alfalfa Mix Hay in McComb, OhioContextual local forage evidence in this locality
Audit trail

Methodology & sources

This page was compiled offline from atomic facts. Government services are never called while you load the page.

NOAA National Centers for Environmental InformationU.S. Annual/Seasonal Climate Normals, multivariate by station
1991-2020 v1.0.1stationOfficial source ↗
National Drought Mitigation Center / USDA / NOAAU.S. Drought Monitor comprehensive weekly statistics
rollingcounty area statistics attached to localities through TIGER/Line containmentOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2008 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2009 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
200930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2010 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2011 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2012 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2013 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2014 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2015 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2016 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201630-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2017 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201730-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2018 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201830-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2019 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
201930-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2020 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202030-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2021 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202130-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202230-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2023 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202330-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2024 Cropland Data Layer — national 30-meter
202430-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2025 Cropland Data Layer — national resampled 30-meter
202530-meter rasterOfficial source ↗
USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service2022 Census of Agriculture, Volume 1 Chapter 2 County Level
Evidence definitions and data confidence

EXACT identifies this hay type directly. FAMILY is broader family or supporting-crop evidence. GENERAL is context only. Public price observations are treated as confidence signals, not mandatory evidence.

Public agricultural records show relevant hay and forage activity in this area. Local Brome Hay availability should be confirmed with suppliers. Prices vary by quality, bale format, season, and delivery, so request current supplier quotes for the most relevant pricing.

Generator: max-v1.0 · 64 cited facts in this document · data as of 2026-09-01.